Tue07222014

Last updateTue, 08 Jul 2014 6am

Mobbing: Danny Hunt

INTRODUCTION

Danny Hunt has been documenting workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment since being a victim of these and "setup" by a criminal harassment network. He was led to believe he had caused the death of a teammate when a minor by criminal harassment participants, reported this belief in 2003-2004, which resulted in criminal allegations of criminal mischief. The teammate was found alive but her twin brother ceased to exist, he now had to prove that he had caused her death to be found not guilty of criminal mischief.

He documents different strategies and psychological manipulations, workplace psychological harassment, bullying, mobbing, and criminal harassment networks. This documentation and information gives victims of these credibility instead of ridicule. He believes that victims of workplace psychological harassment, bullying, mobbing, sexual harassment, and discrimination should write and document their experience, their understanding of them, and how it affected them to make these more visible. Workplace psychological harassment is under reported for different reasons such as intimidation, lack of knowledge, and the repression of knowledge. Taking action gives victims of these a sense of control and can even be a form of therapy. Bullies and criminals always fear exposure.

He claims he was the victim of a homicide attempt through the influence of the mind and sees the same patterns and psychological manipulations linked to other homicides through influence of the mind, mobbing or bullying suicide victims such as Magen Meier's and Jamey Rodemeyer. Homicide through influence of the mind was repealed in the Canadian Criminal Code in 1999.

More recently in 2010-2011 he claims this criminal harassment network, criminal harassment participants, combine powerful radar assaults and technology with police criminal allegations, and that non-criminal responsibility before trial is used to circumvent the right to a trial in the Canadian Judicial System. On Feb 21, 2011 he was charged with "uttering threats towards women" on facebook when he shared a Mobbing Research article in the discussion area, that was also published on CNN iReport, and acquitted on Jun 4, 2012 after a trial.

 

1st ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT

KILLING BY THROUGH INFLUENCE OF THE MIND S. 227

Canadian Criminal Code
227. Repealed, 1999, c. 5, s. 9
Killing by influence on the mind

228. No person commits culpable homicide where he causes the death of a human being
(a) by any influence on the mind alone, or
(b) by any disorder or disease resulting from influence on the mind alone,
but this section does not apply where a person causes the death of a child or sick person by wilfully frightening him.

 

ARTICLES THAT ARE LINKED TO RHETORIC, HATE, AND REJECTION LINKED TO MENTAL HEATH AND THE CAUSE OF SUICIDES.

Megan Meier and Jamey Robemeyer Links to Suicide Through Influence of the Mind, Bullying and Suicide Prevention - CNN iReport (video)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-670255

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srmS0dkyyWg

Jamey Rodemeyer

Anti-Gay rhetoric is linked to suicides because of the rejection and hate. In a video Jamey Rodemeyer states he couldn't "escape it", the hate, and it overwhelmed him.

Megan Meier's


Psychological manipulation was involved in Megan Meier's suicide, a series of steps that lead to her suicide.

[1] An adult mother of another teenager posing as a 16 year old boy, a new friend;
[2] Not wanting to be friends anymore because "Megan is not nice to her friends", psychological crisis;
[3] The boy leads the start of insults on Megan with other teenagers, mobbing[m];
[4] The boy states "the world would be a better place without Megan", mobbing[m];
[5] Megan commits suicide.

1. new friend, 2. crisis linked to rejection, 3. rejection and mobbing, 4. kill yourself? "the world would be a better place without Megan", 5. Megan commits suicide

Danny Hunt

This is what a criminal harassment network and organized crime did to me, a form of assassination attempt through influence of the mind.

I was the victim of workplace psychological harassment, depressed, burnout, followed by a criminal harassment network "you have no future, your future is in the garbage, you are eating garbage, kill yourself, hang yourself, the homeless are in the anus, you are in the anus", I felt purposeless, very negative thoughts about the future from this influence, I was led to believe I caused the death of someone when a minor, the brother's voice of this person was used to "bring me down" further, hate, the criminal harassment network influenced my perception and lead me to believe everyone wanted me to die, "I couldn't escape the hate", repetitive suggestion that I should hang myself, sound technology and repetitive suggestion that I should hang myself, psychological manipulation through sound technology and steps that lead to suicide, "make a plan", "call Denis", a last step before the act of suicide, steps and motion towards suicide, and a hanging attempt.

Canadian Criminal Code

227. Repealed, 1999, c. 5, s. 9
Killing by influence on the mind

228. No person commits culpable homicide where he causes the death of a human being

(a) by any influence on the mind alone, or
(b) by any disorder or disease resulting from influence on the mind alone,

but this section does not apply where a person causes the death of a child or sick person by wilfully frightening him.

 

Anti-Gay Rhetoric Causes Psychological Harm and Suicides
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-636548
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSchCMB4Q-g

[1] ANTI-GAY QUOTES from the video:

- Reparative Therapy based on the theory that gay people can be turned into heterosexuals through a combination of prayer and will power;
- The gay and lesbian lifestyle is personal bondage, personal despair, and personal enslavement;
- It's a sad life;
- It's part of Satan;
- Individuals who have gone into the lifestyle have been abused at one time in their life, either by a male or female;
- As if we need to understand that barbarians need to be educated. They need to be disciplined and just because someone feels it or thinks it doesn't mean that we are supposed to go down that road;

-----

[2] IT GETS BETTER thoughts of acceptance/rejection and suicide video:

[1] ANTI-GAY QUOTES aka RHETORIC and [2] IT GETS BETTER thoughts of acceptance, rejection, and suicide. Rejection and hate are linked to suicides. Conclusion, anti-gay rhetoric causes psychological harm and suicides.


Jamey Rodemeyer, Anti-Gay Rhetoric linked to Hate Causes Psychological Harm and Suicides
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-678357

Jamey Rodemeyer

The hate Jamey was subjected to overwhelmed his ability to keep reminding himself that he was a beautiful person, leading to a suicide.

Jamey Rodemeyer

[1] "people would just constantly send me hate, telling me that gay people go to hell" [m]
[2] "people would be like faggot fag, they taunt me in the hallways, and I felt like I could never escape it"

Megan Meier's

[1] An adult mother of another teenager posing as a 16 year old boy, a new friend;
[2] Not wanting to be friends anymore because "Megan is not nice to her friends", psychological crisis;
[3] The boy leads the start of insults on Megan with other teenagers, mobbing[m];
[4] The boy states "the world would be a better place without Megan", mobbing[m];
[5] Megan commits suicide.

Amy Winehouse

[1] The last few weeks of Amy's life are linked to drugs, a "bad drug reaction" that prevented her performance and being disliked for it;
[2] The perception that people dislike you or hate you, leading to a suicide; [m]

Danny Hunt

[3] This criminal harassment network influenced my perception and led me to believe everyone hated me and wanted me to die, mobbing[m];
[4] Sound technology was used to repeat that I should hang myself, repetitive suggestion or thought influence, "hang yourself", and psychological manipulation linked to steps and actions towards a suicide attempt "make a plan", "call Denis", I did, failed, and a failed assassination attempt at around 1998;

 

2nd ASSASSINATION THROUGH CALCIUM DEPLETION AND REPETITIVE POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS

ACID-BASE IMBALANCE, MACROMINERAL DEPLETION, RADIATION TECHNOLOGY

DEADLY CANCERS, LUNG CANCER, BONE CANCER, LEUKEMIA, ETC.

 

HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS, CIRCUMVENTING THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Dear International Community, Human Rights Violations - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-711891

[7] A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived, criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor and attempts at repetitive humiliation;

Human Rights Violation, Homicides in Canada - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-700426

Citizens are assaulted with powerful radar during the period of time a they try to defend themselves from criminal allegations; the mob in Canada is combining powerful radar assaults with criminal allegations;

Powerful Radar Targeting System Theory

2007

My experience in -- has been about 4 years of criminal harassment, provocation and threats linked to stress, cortisol, and adrenaline to deplete potassium linked to the bodies buffer system, combined with sleep deprivation through sound technology, sound technology such as the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound technology, to induce acid-base imbalance linked to physical damage, premature aging, and calcium depletion;

2010-2011

This was followed by radar assaults starting in 2010, followed by 2011 criminal allegations of uttering threats on Facebook in a post for discussion called Mobbing Research .. , the -- police entering my home without warrant and seizing my computers without warrant combined with an unlawful assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility, non-criminal responsibility would sanction the arrest and charges, search and seizure without a warrant;

Targeting System Theory

I first believed that the combination of calcium depletion and radar assaults was an attempt to manipulate the targeted citizen in absorbing neurotoxic metals like lead when attempting to shield themselves from the radar assaults, lead is used in the industry to shield from x-rays and radar. And this may be true since calcium depletion is linked to bad health, heart disease, colon cancer, brain health, and lead would increase the attack on the brain; The targeting system theory is linked to the fact that similar to absorbing more lead due to the calcium depletion, the targeted citizen can also absorb more radioactive isotopes used in a targeting system, which can be linked to the powerful radar assaults and powerful radar streams aimed at the shin bone, hips and butt, "how can they see me in my own home?".

 

Update From the Creator and Founder of this Web Site - (newsflash)

On February 21, 2011 the creator and found of this website, the only English website on psychological harassment, was arrested by the Canadian Police and charged with uttering threats towards women in a published article called Mobbing Research .. , the police entered his home without a warrant and seized his computers without a warrant, demanded that he remain incarcerated when he has no criminal record for a psychological evaluation, and was released on conditions with an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial. He received a "nothing wrong" letter from the Quebec Police Ethics. On June 4, 2012 a judge will give his verdict on several Charter violations such as entering a home without a warrant and freedom of the press that will determine if proceedings continue with a trial. During this long period of time he claims he is the victim of powerful radar assaults linked to deadly cancers such as lung cancer, leukemia, and testicular cancer.

 

Acquitted of "uttering threats towards women" in a Mobbing Research article - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-799134

Acquitted of "uttering threats towards women" in a Mobbing Research article

On Feb 21, 2011 the creator and founder of the website Psychological Harassment Information Association was charged with uttering threats towards women on facebook when he posted an article in the CSPAN page discussion area called Mobbing Research .. ,

The article contains a parody that illustrates the idea that Marc Lepine may not be the one that wrote his suicide note and that someone else may have to hide the cause, the use of homelessness as a weapon by the mob or mobbing in modern society.

The motive of the article was to identify the cause of rage shootings, Rage Shooting Factors, and to prevent them.

Mobbing Research : Marc Lepine and Rage shooting and Rampages [facebook]
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-559620

Dear Police,
I write this suicide note so that you won't have too, I just want everyone to know that If I commit suicide today or [go on a rampage] it's not because my means of subsistence have been eliminated and drained by the mob who try to pass themselves off as our society, .... it's because I hate women now ..
------
What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause.
..
"Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons." - Marc Lepine

Charter Issues

All of the charter violations that were presented before trial that included freedom of expression, the entry into a dwelling home without a warrant, the seizure of personal computers without a warrant that was not justified in court, the "unlawful" non-criminal responsibility assessment order before trial that could be used to circumvent the right to a fair trial and sanction the allegations and charter violations, discrimination and prejudice resulting from demands of incarceration and assessment orders before trial, an Appeal for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial ceasing to exist at the Superior Court presentation, .. , were all dismissed.

The Trial

The police officers maintained the belief that their allegations were valid. A large part of the trial focused on the Police print out that was provided by the crown prosecutor of the discussion on the CSPAN facebook page. The result and pertinent points in the trial was that the police members did not know the meaning of the word Mobbing in the title Mobbing Research .. , and therefor did not have a full comprehension of the title and discussion. Another point was that the title contains two distinct subjects Rage Shootings and Rampages, which do not mean the same thing and do not match the criminal code violation said to have been committed, the threat to cause serious bodily harm and death. The belief that the word rampage was similar or the same as the word carnage, which it is not. Another was that the paragraph used to file the allegations was taken out of context from the rest of the article.

The defense also pointed out that he was the founder and creator of the only English website on psychological harassment, which includes subjects like mobbing, bullying, discrimination, and sexual harassment, that he a human rights defender and advocates civil rights. The paragraph does not match the reality of the defendant, the defendant has a means of subsistence, it has not been eliminated by the mob, and the defendant does not hate women he advocates civil rights and provides information on work related sexual harassment.

Issues and Theory

The defendant stated that those who document workplace psychological harassment and mobbing are targetted by those who use these and have an interest in repressing information and knowledge, these give victims credibility instead of ridicule.

A judgement concerning the freedom of expression was given in the charter violation presented before trial, R v Keegstra. In this judgement the Supreme Court Judges include uttering threats as part of the freedom of expression, and the theory by the defendant is that being highly intelligent the Supreme Court judges can easily guess what criminal allegations could be used to give a journalist "problems" for publishing controversial content.

R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 SCR 697
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1990/1990canlii24/1990canlii24.html
"This exception refers only to expression communicated directly through physical harm. Hate propaganda is not analogous to violence. It conveys a meaning that is repugnant, but the repugnance stems from the content of the message and not from its form. As for threats of violence, they are not excluded from the definition of expression envisioned by s. 2(b)."

Important Issues

Freedom of expression and freedom of the press; the freedom of the press plays a vital role in society and in protecting democracy, the pursuit of the truth, and it is not supposed to be easily dismissed or circumvented by the authorities who find the content of articles controversial or for any other reason.

Capital punishment, lawsuits, police wrong doing, and the conviction of the innocent. Police wrong doing and lawsuits may be linked to increasing the pressure to convict the innocent, in the U.S. this conviction can be capital punishment, the right to life.

Non-criminal responsibility before trial is used in the Canadian Judicial System to circumvent the right to a fair trial, a serious human rights violation.[1]

Radar assaults, the defendant claims that during the proceedings in the court house he was assaulted with powerful radar, an issue discussed and explained in other articles and website pages linked to intervention that leads to incarceration and assessment orders, in this case non-criminal responsibility before trial.

Intervention and incarceration[2], the criminal harassment network that the defendant has been documenting for several years used the threat of intervention extensively during this period of time. The threat of intervention is linked to behavior, protection measures against the powerful radar assaults, and personal hygiene that begins to suffers due to attempts to avoid these. -- (So the public criminal harassment routine of threats to induce adrenaline and cortisol, trying to standing directly behind the victim at the cash register, and interpret the voice fluctuations as fear is changed to threats of intervention, participants trying to smell the victim, saying "he smells bad", .. and every criminal harassment participant is an undercover psychiatrist who wants to intervene and incarcerate the victim of criminal harassment.)

Rage shootings and workplace violence, mobbing research question "for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs" was Marc Lepine the victim of workplace psychological harassment and mobbing, using homelessness as a weapon, leading to a terrible crime and a fabricated suicide note to hide the cause?[3] .. and advocating gun control?[4]

Circumventing Rights and Freedoms

The Marc Lepine crime at the Montreal Polytech was a terrible one that involved many victims similar to the mass shooting of Cho a Virginia Tech. In Cho's cause similar to the Columbine massacre the cause may have been bullying or repetitive humiliation. With Marc Lepine, the mob targets and eliminates the means of subsistence of those targeted to use homelessness as a weapon, to circumvent the rights and freedoms that we have. If this is the case and a suicide note was written to hide the cause, it would be to advocate gun control and circumvent another right that the population has, the right to bear arms.

Fifteen Strategies to Circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - CNN iReport
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-733909

[1]THE FIRST STRATEGY -- MENTAL ILLNESS, DISCRIMINATION, THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

The first strategy uses assessment orders before trial, disability and mental illness, and participating psychiatrists to circumvent the right to a fair trial. -- The strategy is linked to smear campaigns and using assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility of committing a crime due to mental illness before trial when the accused has not committed a crime. It uses ignorance or the claim that being not guilty of committing a crime due to mental illness is the same as simply being not guilty. The accused does not go to trial or get a trial.

[2 ]THE SEVENTH STRATEGY -- INTERVENTION AND INCARCERATION

The seventh strategy uses intervention to circumvent the right to liberty, which leads to incarceration at a prison psychiatric institution similar to the first strategy that uses non-criminal responsibility assessment orders before trial to circumvent the right to a fair trial.

[3]THE FIFTH STRATEGY -- THE HOMELESSNESS WEAPON

Citizens are presented with the believe that they have rights and civil liberties, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but they are circumvented through the use of homelessness, the homelessness weapon. -- The Police, Criminal Judicial System, and Mob are linked to eliminating a citizens means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations or during long delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to make a conviction or smear campaign easier, mobbing.

[4]THE FIFTEENTH STRATEGY -- RAGE SHOOTINGS

This one is very controversial, it involves the right to bear arms and the idea that a well armed population is its best defense against dictatorship. Here is an example of how this right can be circumvented to lead to different forms of dictatorships through organized crime. -- Organized crime uses workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment to use homelessness as a weapon and to circumvent the rights of citizens, which is linked to rage shootings and an interest in abusing citizens to cause rage shootings, which leads to advocating gun control and an unarmed or defenseless population.

Freedom of Expression Notes

Freedom of expression and freedom of the press; the freedom of the press plays a vital role in society and in protecting democracy, the pursuit of the truth, and it is not supposed to be easily dismissed or circumvented by the authorities who find the content of articles controversial or for any other reason. -- (wish to cause "problems" for a publisher, financial loss, high legal costs, bankrupt, incarcerate, wear down, stress, interfere with, distract,, smear campaigns, radar assaults, cancer,, permit any form of attack or used in combination with other forms of attack ,, fear exposure, fear the information, wish to repress the information or journalist ,, criminal allegations that can place the writer on the defensive and create vulnerability to crime or organized crime.)

It is obvious to most people that this was a published article with a title and that the Supreme Court judges even include uttering threats as part of the freedom of expression in R v Keegstra. It seems to the defendant that the court was using other judgements, which include Appeals court judgements to water down this protection, go to a trial where guilt will now be determined by ..

The defendant claims that the article published on CNN iReport was given to the crown prosecutors at the beginning of the proceedings and that during these long, delayed, and expensive proceedings he was assaulted daily with powerful radar linked to cancer. The distraction and attempts to defend himself from the allegations increased the exposure to these assaults. The drain on his finances and threats of intervention that would lead to incarceration and the "unlawful" non-criminal responsibility before trial, increasing legal costs and creating a vulnerability to participating defense lawyers, reduced his ability and attempts to protect himself from these, which on the longer term can turn into serious illness and deadly cancers.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 SCR 933, Supreme Court of Canada
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1991/1991canlii104/1991canlii104.html

"I believe, moreover, that conferring on the prosecution a conditional right to raise the issue of insanity during the course of the trial infringes upon the equality rights of the mentally disabled under s. 15 of the Charter. It denies the mentally disabled, a group in our society which has been negatively stereotyped and historically disadvantaged, the control over their defences reposed in other accused persons and does so in a way which is discriminatory. In denying the mentally disabled personal autonomy in decision‑making it reinforces the stereotype that they are incapable of rational thought and the ability to look after their own interests. In a word, it denies them equality with other accused persons under the guise, putting it at its best, of a benign paternalism.

It seems to me that the principle advanced in support of the prosecution's right to introduce evidence of insanity can be effectively implemented by having the issue of the accused's insanity raised at the conclusion of the trial in cases where the defences put forward by the accused have been rejected and the essential elements of the offence have been established by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. At that point I think either party should be free to raise the issue of the accused's insanity. I realize, of course, that there is an element of circularity involved in this approach in that insanity has a direct bearing on proof of mens rea. However, I prefer this approach since it both respects the accused's right to waive the defence of insanity and ensures that any resultant prejudice he suffers in the finding of guilt flows from his own decision not to avail himself of the defence and not as a consequence of the prosecution's having raised the issue in the middle of the trial process.

In my view, if the prosecution's right to raise the issue of the accused's insanity is confined as I have suggested, the requirements of s. 16(1) are satisfied and no infringement of the accused's trial rights under either s. 7 or s. 15 are involved. I express no opinion as to whether any other constitutional rights of the accused, other than his trial rights, are infringed by such a rule or by s. 16(1) of the Code and, if so, whether any such infringement would be saved by s. 1 since this is not, for obvious reasons, before us.

I should add that I recognize that restricting the Crown's right to introduce the issue of insanity only after an accused has been found guilty may well result in some accuseds who are in fact insane being acquitted of criminal charges and thereby escaping incarceration under the Criminal Code entirely. .. "

 

Did Someone Else Write Marc Lepine's Suicide Note and Use a Stereotype, An Arab Father? - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-817405

The stereotype issue, did Mark Lepine commit this terrible crime to "hit back at society" and a suicide note written to hide the cause, mobbing, the mob using homelessness as a weapon, by using a stereotype based on an Arab father. (update Aug 1)

Update: ""The Aurora Colo. massacre happened shortly after the publication of this article. I was the victim of intense powerful radar assaults last night, communicated this to human rights organizations, and discovered another terrible massacre had occurred similar to the one in this article. I do not know if this intense assault was some kind of retaliation to this massacre or if this massacre its self is some kind of retaliation or deterrent to this article." *Update, suspect was a PH.D candidate and in the process of withdrawing from University*"

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-817405 (unavailable/censored)

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-822555 (republished)

The stereotype issue, did Mark Lepine commit this terrible crime to "hit back at society" and a suicide note written to hide the cause, mobbing, the mob using homelessness as a weapon, by using a stereotype based on an Arab father.

"The Marc Lepine crime at the Montreal Polytech was a terrible one that involved many victims similar to the mass shooting of Cho a Virginia Tech. In Cho's case similar to the Columbine massacre the cause may have been bullying or repetitive humiliation. With Marc Lepine, the mob targets and eliminates the means of subsistence of those targeted to use homelessness as a weapon, to circumvent the rights and freedoms that we have. If this is the case and a suicide note was written to hide the cause, it would be to advocate gun control and circumvent another right that the population has, the right to bear arms."

Mobbing Research : Marc Lepine and Rage shooting and Rampages [facebook]
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-559620
Feb 21, 2011

"Dear Police,
I write this suicide note so that you won't have too, I just want everyone to know that If I commit suicide today or go on a rampage it's not because my means of subsistence have been eliminated and drained by the mob who try to pass themselves off as our society, .... it's because I hate women now .." - A Parody of Suicide Note

"What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause."

"Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons." - Mark Lepine Suicide Note

Following the publication of this article the writer was arrested and charged with uttering threats towards women, which was combined with powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, public places, and court house too, which are linked to deadly cancers, leukemia and lung cancer. This made the ability to function during the criminal allegation proceedings period almost impossible, created a large financial debt., and continue during attempts to recover this loss through a civil lawsuit.

Hitting Back:
- A man blows up the Oklahoma FBI building, said to be hitting back for the Waco Texas incident;
- A man fly's a plane into a government building, said to be hitting back for unfair treatment by IRS;
- A man shoots 4 RCMP members, linked to bankruptcy and repossession;
- A homeless person snowplows a member of the Police force, linked to homelessness;
- A man shoots a member of government, ..
- A man shoots 9 people at his workplace after being fired;
- A man shoots several women at a Montreal University; claims in a suicide letter that it is not because he has no more finances;
- The Columbine Massacre, said to be victims of bullying and repetitive humiliation;

Stereotypes and Discrimination

The article of Feb 21, 2011 involves the possibility that someone else wrote the suicide note to hide the cause of Marc Lepine's terrible crime, a massacre. The stereotype issue is that a stereotype that involves an Arab father may have been used in this attempt to hide the cause. Another stereotype issue, the writer and defendant was faced with demands for incarceration and a psychological evaluation by the Police, which was followed by a demand for non-criminal responsibility before trial by the Crown Prosecutor, which would make the allegations of uttering threats towards women a valid allegations, circumvent the presentation of charter violations at trial such as freedom of expression, entering and searching a home without a warrant, seizing private computers without a warrant, and making the seizure of these private computers, private information, legal. The stereotype issue involved in these criminal proceedings involves mental illness (see discriminatory in Canadian Supreme Court R v Swain), non-criminal responsibility before trial that circumvents the right to a fair trial and the presentation of charter violation issues, rights and freedoms.

Acquitted of "uttering threats towards women" in a Mobbing Research article
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-799134

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Links to Smear Campaigns
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-808083

Circumventing the Right to Bear Arms, Bullying and Workplace Psychological Harassment - (newsflash)

THE FIFTEENTH STRATEGY -- RAGE SHOOTINGS

This one is very controversial, it involves the right to bear arms and the idea that a well armed population is its best defense against dictatorship. Here is an example of how this right can be circumvented to lead to different forms of dictatorships through organized crime. -- Organized crime uses workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment to use homelessness as a weapon and to circumvent the rights of citizens, which is linked to rage shootings and an interest in abusing citizens to cause rage shootings, which leads to advocating gun control and an unarmed or defenseless population. -- Dictatorships have news and "freedom of the press" too, this is not the deterrent and protection from dictatorships, a well armed population that can rise up and overthrow any dictatorship or abusive authorities is. Dictators and abusive authorities know and fear this, which would be linked to the incentive of wanting a defenseless population.

An armed population is a deterrent to abusive governments, oppression, and dictatorships. These fear an armed population that can rise up and remove them, a defenseless population is more vulnerable to abuse. -- Have you ever noticed that when a population rises up against abusive dictators and oppression they need arms and weapons from outside forces or they are simply crushed and suppressed? -- Abuse and oppression, violence against women, their husbands, and their children.

 

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial

Non-criminally responsible before trial is like being found guilty of the criminal allegations without a trial but not criminally responsible due to mental illness. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights charters specify that everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a fair trial, non-criminal responsibility before trial circumvents this.

DECLARE that assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that can circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation issues presented at trial to be unconstitutional, violates section 7, 9, 11(b), 11(d), and section 15;

DECLARE that the warrantless seizure of private computers is unconstitutional, violates section 8;

DECLARE that fabricating criminal allegations of uttering threats in a published research article to be unconstitutional, violates section 2(b);

 

NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c. 3rd (August 27, 2012)

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-834413

On February 21, 2011 when I was arrested for publishing and sharing a mobbing research article that involves a list of people "hitting back" by committing terrible crimes and Marc Lepine. The defense lawyer that I was introduced to told me that following a demand that I remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation by the Police that I had no choice but to remain incarcerated for 30 days. Even after explaining ..

.. that I had a website on the issue of psychological harassment, bullying, mobbing, and that this was a published article on CNN iReport he told me that I had written an article about Marc Lepine and people who write articles about these terrible crimes tend to do the same .... I was assaulted with powerful radar and radiation technology linked to deadly cancers throughout the long and delayed criminal proceedings in my own home, public places, and court house. I was acquitted on June 4, 2012 and now involved in a human rights complaint and civil lawsuit that involves the freedom of expression, which is vital for a democracy and the pursuit of the truth and constitutional questions, the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial that circumvents the right to a trial and warrantless seizures of private computers. see the Danny Hunt (mobbing) page for more. Received donations will be mentioned on this page.

The long and delayed criminal proceeding costs and the materials that were purchased in attempts to attenuate, shield, and protect me from the radar assaults during this period of time were both expensive and created a large financial debt.. The radar assaults continue along with other forms of pressure to discontinue attempts to recover this financial loss from false allegations and attempts to address laws that violate the constitution, our rights and freedoms.

The donations are to attenuate powerful radar from neighboring homes.

Please leave any donations in the drive way at:

Danny Hunt

558 Felix

Laval Quebec

H7P3E3

tel/fax: 450-622-7117

Radar attenuation and shielding, what I'm doing. I'm using steal plate 2' x 4' and painting these with different white paint that contain titanium, magnesium (talc), barium (barytes), hard enamel. I've created (lead, granite or slate or marble, aluminum tape/foil) 12" x 12" panels. Marble (dolomite aka MgCa(CO3)2) is another good powerful radar or cosmic radiation attenuator or shielding material. Water bottles with shredded green leaves Mg (wet foliage), sea and epsom salts, these shield from both radar and focused ultrasound aka Hypersonic Sound or LRAD type of technology systems used from neighboring homes. Research documents say Magnesium Alloys (MgZn) are one if not the best attenuators but magnesium alloys are very hard to find, as if they were banned from the market.

 

CANADA

PROVINCE DE QUEBEC

DISTRICT DE LAVAL

Numéro du greffe : 540

 

No: 540-17-005409-122

No: 540-01-048499-118

No: LVL-110221-041

 

Superior COURT OF JUSTICE

(CIVIL COURT)

__________________________________________

 

DANNY HUNT;

Demander

 

v.

 

Attorney General of QUEBEC;

-and-

--

-and-

--

Defenders

__________________________________________

 

NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c.

 

Destination : Attorney General of Québec

Palais de justice de Montréal

1, rue Notre-Dame Est, bureau 8.00

Montréal (Québec)H2Y 1B6

And.

Deputy Attorney General

Quebec Regional Office

Department of Justice Canada

Guy-Favreau Complex

East Tower, 9th Floor

200 René-Lévesque Boulevard West

Montréal, Québec

H2Z 1X4

And.

--

And.

--

And.

--

 

TAKE NOTICE that by procedure 94 and articles 24(1) and 52(1) the demander Danny Hunt has the intention of having declared inapplicable constitutionally or invalid in regards to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms (chapter C-12) dispositions in the criminal code. Non-criminal responsibility before trial 672.12 (1), 672.12 (1)(3) (a), 672.12 (1)(3)(b) , warrantless seizures of private computers, and 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b) uttering threats for published and shared research articles.

 

672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor.

(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if

(a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or

(b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.

264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;

(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

 

FURTHER MORE, TAKE NOTICE that the date of audience of this cause is set for 25 September 2012, at 9:00 am, or as soon as the court will permit, in front of one of the Honourable Superior Court Judges, Civil Court, District of Laval, at the Palais de Justice de Laval , in room 2.02.

 

The pretentions of Danny Hunt and his arguments are to the effect;

 

[1]THAT Danny Hunt is the creator and founder of the only English website on the issue of psychological harassment that includes workplace psychological harassment, criminal harassment, bullying, mobbing, discrimination, and sexual harassment;

 

[2]THAT Danny Hunt is a human rights defender and a world leader on these issues;

 

[3]THAT Danny Hunt published on CNN iReport a Mobbing Research article on February 13, 2011 that involves a list of people “hitting back” by committing terrible crimes linked to the loss of finances, employment, bankruptcy, and homelessness;

 

[4]THAT in this list Marc Lepine is a strange exception where a suicide note actually states that this link, depleted finances and homelessness, are not the cause of his terrible crime as if Marc Lepine knows the cause of other similar terrible crimes or as if someone else wrote the suicide note to hide the cause, mobbing, the elimination of a person’s means of subsistence and the depletion of finances, and the use of homelessness as a weapon;

 

[5]THAT on February 21, 2011 Danny Hunt published the same article on CNN iReport with the exception of a parody of Marc Lepine’s suicide note at the top of the Mobbing Research article;

 

[6]THAT on February 21, 2011 Danny Hunt was arrested and incarcerated by the -- Police after sharing the article in the Facebook CSPAN discussion area;

 

[7]THAT the -- Police entered and searched the dwelling home of Danny Hunt without a warrant, located his private computers, and seized the private computers for evidence without a warrant;

 

[8]THAT the criminal charge of uttering threats towards women 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b) on February 21, 2011 is fabricated from the parody in the Mobbing Research article published on February 21, 2011;

 

[9]THAT the -- Police made a demand that Danny Hunt remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation based on 1. No criminal record 2. A disability, mental illness 3. A previous incident of non-criminal responsibility in 2003;

 

[10]THAT following the -- Police demand the Crown made a demand on February 23, 2011 for an assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility, which would circumvent the right to a trial if successful;

 

[11]THAT the February 23, 2011 assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility if successful would circumvent the presentation of several charter violation issues at trial such as the freedom of expression, entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computers and information without a warrant, and make this seizure of private computers and information legal;

 

[12]THAT on February 23, 2011 Danny Hunt had to agree to conditions and an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial to be released;

 

[13]THAT Danny Hunt had discussed his innocence and did not want an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility;

 

[14]THAT a criminal harassment network led him to believe that he had caused the death of a teammate in the Club de Natation Laval when a minor, a girl, which he reported to the Surete du Quebec in 2003;

 

[15]THAT the girl was found alive but did not have a twin brother as Danny Hunt remembers and when he persisted with his claim and belief that this was the wrong person it resulted in allegations of criminal mischief, which Danny Hunt sees as a form of setup by this criminal harassment network;

 

[16]THAT Danny Hunt has endured different forms of attacks from this criminal harassment network that he documents on the Psychological Harassment Information Association website on different pages such as the Psychological Manipulation page;

 

[17]THAT the criminal proceedings period of time was combined with powerful radar assaults and radiation technology that focused on the shin bone linked to inflicting bone marrow damage and leukemia; the lungs area linked to inflaming the lungs, irritating the lungs, scaring the lungs, and damaging the lungs to inflict lung cancer; on the testicles to damage the testicles and destroy testosterone production; from neighboring homes, public places, and the Laval Court House, which Danny Hunt believes to be linked to this criminal harassment network;

 

[18]THAT both the long and costly proceedings that required Appeals and transcripts, and the powerful radar assaults, that required radar attenuation materials overwhelmed the finances of Danny Hunt and created a large debt.;

 

[19]THAT these assaults with a cancer causing weapon, the focus on inflicting deadly cancers, a homicide on a long term, combined with the criminal allegation towards a human rights defender and the freedom of expression are the subject of a human rights complaint with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights;

 

[20]THAT Danny Hunt deposited for March 9, 2011 a motion for the restitution of his private computers along with evidence, the article in question. By providing and submitting evidence there is no more justification to keep and search his computers for evidence;

 

[21]THAT the -- Police left for vacation and returned around March 23, 2011 and the Crown was no longer available until April 12, 2011;

 

[22]THAT the motion was granted for the restitution of the private computers, the Crown stated that no data analysis would be required, the computers were returned on April 12, 2011;

 

[23]THAT the Crown had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure of private computers without a warrant, a charter violation;

 

[24]THAT the -- Police went to Danny Hunt’s residence 3 or more times, said the issue was suspect vehicles, and discussed psychiatric intervention for the behavior of attempting to shield himself from the powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, which leads to incarceration and costly legal representation;

 

[25]THAT Danny Hunt was contesting the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial of February 23, 2011on June 13, 2011 when it was corrected or renewed;

 

[26]THAT the assessment order of February 23, 2011 did not contain the correct hospital information, it indicated Albert Prevost instead of CPLM, and was therefore made Out of Jurisdiction according to R v. Creighton, and was corrected or renewed to CPLM on June 13, 2011;

 

[27]THAT Danny Hunt attempted to contest the assessment order on May 24, 2011, June 13, 2011, and Appeal the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial at the Appeals Court and Superior Court from July 20, 2011 to October 21, 2011 for no evidence being provided for demand R v Muschke, R v Dobrotic, that the assessment order must be asked for at the end of trial R v Swain, and by specifying the wrong hospital the assessment order was made out of jurisdiction R v Creighton;

 

[28]That the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial instead of at the end of trial as indicated in the Canadian Supreme Court Judgment R v. Swain in criminal proceedings is unconstitutional;

 

[29]THAT an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility must be made at the end of trial as to not interfere with the defendant’s defense according to the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Swain;

 

[30]THAT according the Supreme Court of Canada Judge in R v. Swain <<I believe, moreover, that conferring on the prosecution a conditional right to raise the issue of insanity during the course of the trial infringes upon the equality rights of the mentally disabled under s. 15 of the Charter. It denies the mentally disabled, a group in our society which has been negatively stereotyped and historically disadvantaged, the control over their defences reposed in other accused persons and does so in a way which is discriminatory. In denying the mentally disabled personal autonomy in decisionmaking it reinforces the stereotype that they are incapable of rational thought and the ability to look after their own interests. In a word, it denies them equality with other accused persons under the guise, putting it at its best, of a benign paternalism. -- It seems to me that the principle advanced in support of the prosecution's right to introduce evidence of insanity can be effectively implemented by having the issue of the accused's insanity raised at the conclusion of the trial in cases where the defences put forward by the accused have been rejected and the essential elements of the offence have been established by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. At that point I think either party should be free to raise the issue of the accused's insanity. I realize, of course, that there is an element of circularity involved in this approach in that insanity has a direct bearing on proof of mens rea. However, I prefer this approach since it both respects the accused's right to waive the defence of insanity and ensures that any resultant prejudice he suffers in the finding of guilt flows from his own decision not to avail himself of the defense and not as a consequence of the prosecution's having raised the issue in the middle of the trial process.”>>;

 

[31]THAT the Crown on February 23, 2011 did not provide any evidence to support his demand for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial by way of affidavit or oral testimony;

 

[32]THAT according to the criminal code and the Supreme Court of British Columbia Honourable Justice Pitfield in R v. Muschke, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony must be presented by the Crown to make a demand for non-criminal responsibility 672.12(3)(b);<<[31] .. recital of what were referred toby the Crown as facts was insufficient for purposes of ss. 672.11 and 672.12, affidavit or viva voce evidence was required,-- [40] In the ordinary course, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony. -- [47] .. In the case ofR. v. Dobrotic, [1995] N.B.J. No. 222 (Q.L.), the New Brunswick Court of Appeal concluded that even with the consent of the accused to assessment, an order should not be made unless there was sufficient evidence before the judge to provide reasonable grounds to doubt the accused's criminal responsibility. -- [48] Even if they could have been relied upon to establish reasonable grounds for belief, the recitation of facts by counsel disclosed unusual and quite possibly unacceptable conduct on the part of the applicant but did not provide reasonable and probable grounds for believing that the accused was incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of his acts in the form of the alleged threats or of knowing that his acts were wrong. -- [51] .. the application was made by the prosecutor pursuant to s. 672.12(3)(b) of the Code.Had fitness been an issue, there was nothing before the judge, whether by statements from counsel or otherwise, which would have justified the formulation of a belief based on reasonable grounds that the applicant, on account of mental disorder, was unable to understand the nature or object of the proceedings in which he was involved, understand the possible consequences of the proceedings, or communicate with counsel.One or more of these factors are necessary in order to formulate an opinion that one is unfit to stand trial as the phrase is defined in s. 2 of the Code. -- [52] It follows that because the initial order was unlawful, the extension was equally invalid. ..-- 672.12 (3)(b);(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if; (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.>>;

 

[33]THAT the Crown declared the assessment order expired at the Court of Appeals on October 14, 2011, an Appeal concerning the Crown making the demand before trial R v. Swain and without providing any evidence R v. Muschke, R v. Dobrotic;

 

[34]THATthe Appeal R v. Creighton of October 21, 2011 that was combined with a motion for Abuse of Process “ceased to exist” according to Superior Court Judge -- , resulting in the Abuse of Process motion being made Out of Jurisdiction at the Superior Court without the Appeal R v. Creighton;

 

[35]THATthe Crown stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial on October 21, 2011;

 

[36]THATthe Crown on November 9, 2011 stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial but required the testimony of a psychiatrist as indicated in R v. Muschke “application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony” <<Me -- : Bien, la problematigue c’est que je dois… -- … je dois communiquer avec son psychiatre parce que monsieur etait… il avait eu une… il y avait eu une ordonnance, la… -- … pour que monsieur soit… se fasse evaluer. -- Et le delai de soixante (60) jours etait termine pour cette ordonnance-la et l’evaluation est pas terminee. -- Et monsieur conteste cette ordonnance-la, donc je sais que je devrai assigner la psychiatre pour qu’elle vienne temoigner sur l’etat de monsieur afin de demontrer au Tribunal qu’il y a des motifs, la, pour soupeser cette demande d’ordonnance la. – Sauf que j’ai pas encore communique avec le psychiatre parce que c’est pas necessairement facile. – Et j’esperais, la, que le dix-huit (18) novembre j’aurais les dates de disponibilite de la psychiatre pour qu’on puisse fixer une audition.>>;

 

[37]THAT on November 9, 2011 the Lower Court Judge instituted proceedings and ordered a trial over the objections of the demander for April 13, 2012;

 

[38]That non-criminal responsibility before trial if successful circumvents the right to a trial and charter violation issue presentation at trial;

 

[39]That because non-criminal responsibility before trial circumvents the right to a trial, charter violation issues, and can make an unreasonable search and seizure of private information legal it can be abused for these reasons and motives;

 

[40]THAT for these reasons that the Honourable Superior Court Judge declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial to be unconstitutional;

 

[41]THATthe Crown stated that no data copies of the seized computers exist and therefore no Order to destroy any copies is required or can be issued, no object for the order exists, on December 21, 2011;

 

[42]THAT the -- Police may have data copies of the computers and private information without the Crown’s knowledge;

 

[43]THAT according to the defendants understanding of the legal consequences; if the Crown is mistaken and the Police do have copies the defendant would have to sue the Crown for damages in Civil Court; If an order was issued any existing copies resulting from the seizure by the police would be illegal, which is a considerable difference;

 

[44]THAT a possible scenario example to circumvent an order to destroy any existing copies is by returning the computers after a warrantless seizure, claiming the -- Police have no copies and to the Crowns knowledge there are no copies, and therefor there is no object for the demand for destruction; in addition to this, it is possible that another Police organization such as the Surete du Quebec or RCMP obtained copies through a sealed investigation during the vacation period ;

 

[45]THAT the Crown stated that he had returned the computers and no copies existed on January 12, 2012 at the Superior Court but had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure without a warrant, a charter violation;

 

[46]THAT because of the Crown’s claim that there are no copies, there is no object to issue an order for the destruction of computer copies as is allowed in a seizure with a warrant or objects that are not in the category of data information;

 

[47]THAT on June 4, 2012 the Honourable Judge dismissed 6 charter violation issues that were raised; the first was freedom of expression s. 2(b);

 

[48]THAT on June 4, 2012 another Charter violation issue was Discrimination s. 15 and Prejudice;

 

[49]THAT on June 4, 2012 another Charter violation issue was the search of a dwelling home without a warrant s. 8;

 

[50]THAT on June 4, 2012 another Charter violation issue was the seizure of computers without a warrant that the Crown had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure s. 8;

 

[51]THAT ON June 4, 2012 another Charter violation was the right to be presumed innocent 11(d), tried within a reasonable time s. 11(b), and the security of the person s. 7;

 

[52]Such further and other grounds as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

 

CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS

 

[53]Whether assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial 672.12 (1), 672.12 (1)(3) (a), 672.12 (1)(3)(b) that can circumvent the right to a trial, the presentation of charter violation issues, and can make unlawful seizures of private computers legal and abused for these reasons constitutional, <<A guilty verdict without a trial but not criminally responsible>><<The right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal 11(d)>>, or violate s. 7, 8, 9, 11 (b), 11(d), 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

 

[54]Whether the seizure of private computers without a warrant that involves private information and data such as passwords, contact lists, banking information, and personal information that are simply returned later with the claim that no copies were made, which removes the ability to issue an order to destroy any existing copies making any existing copies from the seizure illegal, <<no object to issue the order>><<unreasonable search and seizure s. 8 and the right to security of the person s. 7>>, constitutional or violate s. 7, 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

 

[55]Whether the publication of a research article that is identified as a research article that causes a person to receive a threat 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b),<<in any manner causes any person to receive a threat>>, resulting in incarceration and criminal allegations violates the freedom of expression s. 2(b);

 

IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT RELIES UPON THE FOLLOWING:

 

[56] The -- Police demand for incarceration and psychological evaluation;

[57] The assessment order of February 23, 2011 and June 13, 2011;

[58] The transcript of February 23, 2011, June 13, 2011, October 21, 2011, November 9, 2011, December 21, 2012, January 12, 2012, April 13, 2012, June 4, 2012;

[59] Judgments R v Swain, R v Langlois, R v Wells, R v Oakes, R v Muschke, R v Dobrotic, R v Creighton, R v Keegrstra, R v Irwin Toy, R v Silveira, R v Collins, R v Ruby, R v Cobb, ;

[60] The thick booklet with charter violation issues;

[61] Human Rights Defender Presentation booklet 1st and 2nd;

[62] Human Rights Defender CNN iReport Articles, -- Police Report, Other Documents;

[63] Human Rights Defender Motions June 13, 2011 and October 21, 2011;

[58] Human Rights Defender Other Appeals and Motions;

[59] Human Rights Complaint;

[59] Affidavit and Factum; and

[60] Such further and other material as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

 

THE ORDER SOUGHT IS:

 

[61] A declaration that non-criminal responsibility before trial can circumvent the right to a trial, charter violation issues presented at trial, unreasonable search and seizure, the right to privacy and that because of this it can be abused for these reasons and motives; to declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial instead of at the end of trial as indicated in the Canadian Supreme Court Judgment R v. Swain to be unconstitutional; that the seizure of computers without a warrant is unconstitutional; that dismissing a demand for an order for the destruction of any existing data copies from private computers seized without a warrant is unconstitutional; that criminal allegations towards a human rights defender and a published Mobbing Research article is unconstitutional; and to declare the use of assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial and warrantless search and seizure of private computers to be unconstitutional in regards to the Constitutional Act, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

 

FOR THESE MOTIVES, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:

DECLARE that assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that can circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation issues presented at trial to be unconstitutional, violates section 7, 9, 11(b), 11(d), and section 15;

DECLARE that the warrantless seizure of private computers is unconstitutional, violates section 8;

DECLARE that fabricating criminal allegations of uttering threats in a published research article to be unconstitutional, violates section 2(b);

GRANT .. ;

GRANT the demander who is a human rights defender and a victim of false allegations that involve the freedom of expression, which is essential for a free democracy and the pursuit of the truth without fear of persecution, and the search and seizure of private computers an exemplary amount;

THE WHOLE .. .

PLEASE ACT ACCORDINGLY

 

 

The February 21, 2011 CNN iReport Article in Question (video)

Mobbing Research : Marc Lepine and Rage shooting and Rampages [facebook]
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-559620

Note that the video shows posting on Facebook Walls but the Mobbing Research article was also posted in the Discussion areas and the printout the Crown gave me was of the CSPAN discussion post.

 

Freedom of Expression and Criminal Allegations Charter Violation Issue 2(b) June 4, 2012 (unavailable/censored)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-839143

Seizure of Private Computers Charter Violation Issue Judgment Error June 4, 2012 (unavailable/censored)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-839142

Judgement on Charter Issue Section 2(b), 7, 8, 11(b), 11(d), 15(1)

Judgement of Charter Issues of June 4th, The Facts According to the Judge
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-806479

Judgement of Charter Issues of June 4th Continued (part 2)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-806478

 

 

 

CANADA

PROVINCE DE QUEBEC

DISTRICT DE LAVAL

Numéro du greffe : 540

 

No: 540-17-005409-122

No: 540-01-048499-118

No: LVL-110221-041

 

Superior COURT OF JUSTICE

(CIVIL COURT)

__________________________________________

 

DANNY HUNT;

Demander

 

v.

--

Defenders

__________________________________________

 

MOTION TO RESPOND TO DENOUCIATION NOTICES, TO ADDRESS CHARTER ISSUE JUDGMENT ERROR, TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE, TO RESCHEDULE PRELIMINARY MEASURES TO GIVE TIME FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC TO ADDRESS CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS ACCORDING ARTICLE 95 C.p.c., SECTIONS 24(1) AND 52(1)

 

Destination :

--

And.

--

TAKE NOTICE that this Motion is to Respond to Denounciation Notices, to address a Charter Issue judgment error through articles 24(1) and 52(1), reschedule the preliminary measures to give time for Attorney General of Quebec time to respond on September 25, 2012, to obtain the transcript of April 24, 2012, order the -- Police members involved in the allegations of February 21, 2011 and proceedings on April 13, 2012, and June 4,2012 to identify themselves to a Superior Court Judge, present the contents of this motion and dismiss the Denounciations.

FURTHER MORE, TAKE NOTICE that the date of audience of this cause is set for 11 September 2012, at 9:00 am, or as soon as the court will permit, in front of one of the Honourable Superior Court Judges, Civil Court, District of Laval, at the Palais de Justice de Laval , in room 2.02.

The pretentions of Danny Hunt and his arguments are to the effect;

[1]Danny Hunt is the creator and founder of the only English website on the issue of psychological harassment, Psychological Harassment Information Association, that includes workplace psychological harassment, criminal harassment, bullying, mobbing, discrimination, and sexual harassment;

[2]Danny Hunt published on CNN iReport a Mobbing Research article on February 13, 2011 that involves a list of people “hitting back” by committing terrible crimes linked to the loss of finances, employment, bankruptcy, and homelessness;

[3]In this list Marc Lepine is a strange exception where a suicide note actually states that this link, depleted finances and homelessness, are not the cause of his terrible crime as if Marc Lepine knows the cause of other similar terrible crimes or as if someone else wrote the suicide note to hide the cause, mobbing, the elimination of a person’s means of subsistence and the depletion of finances, and the use of homelessness as a weapon;

[4]On February 21, 2011 Danny Hunt published the same Mobbing Research article on CNN iReport with the exception of a parody of Marc Lepine’s suicide note at the top of the Mobbing Research article;

[5]On February 21, 2011 Danny Hunt was arrested and incarcerated by the -- Police after sharing the Mobbing Research article in the Facebook CSPAN discussion area;

[6]The -- Police entered and searched the dwelling home of Danny Hunt without a warrant, located his private computers, and seized the private computers for evidence without a warrant;

[7]The criminal charge of uttering threats towards women 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b) on February 21, 2011 is fabricated from the parody in the Mobbing Research article published on February 21, 2011;

[8]NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c. of August 27, 2012; Freedom of Expression;

<< Whether the publication of a research article, Mobbing Research article, that is identified as a research article, Mobbing Research, that causes a person to receive a threat 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b),<<in any manner causes any person to receive a threat>>, resulting in incarceration and criminal allegations violates the freedom of expression s. 2(b);>>

[9]The -- Police made a demand that Danny Hunt remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation based on 1. No criminal record 2. A disability, mental illness 3. A previous incident of non-criminal responsibility in 2003;

[10]Following the -- Police demand the Crown made a demand on February 23, 2011 for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial without providing evidence by way of affidavit or testimony;

[11]The February 23, 2011 assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility if successful would circumvent Danny Hunt’s right to a fair trial and the presentation of several charter violation issues at trial such as the freedom of expression, entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computers and information without a warrant, and make this seizure of private computers and information legal;

[12]Danny Hunt has a disability, mental illness, a vulnerability, and claims he was assaulted with powerful radar and radiation technology that focused on the shin bone linked to damaging the shin bone marrow and leukemia; the lungs linked irritating the lungs, inflaming the lungs, damaging the lungs, and scarring the lungs linked to lung cancer; and the testicles linked to damaging the testicles, destroying testosterone production, fertility, increased risk of birth defects and children with autism, and degrading themes during the long and delayed criminal proceedings, which increase the chance the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial would be successful;

[13]Danny Hunt had discussed his innocence and did not want an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility;

[14]Danny Hunt deposited for March 9, 2011 a motion for the restitution of his private computers along with evidence, the February 21, 2011 CNN iReport Mobbing Research article in question; the logic is that by providing evidence there is no justification to keep and search the computers; The -- Police left for vacation and returned around March 23, 2011 and the Crown was no longer available until April 12, 2011;

[15]The motion was granted on April 12, 2011 for the restitution of the private computers, the Crown stated that no data analysis would be required, the computers were returned on April 12, 2011; the Crown had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure of private computers without a warrant, a Charter Violation;

[16]The Charter Issues to this point according to the demander involved the freedom of expression, entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computer without a warrant, the demand for non-criminal responsibility before trial without supporting evidence by way of affidavits and testimony, and as of March 9, 2011 – April 12, 2011 had returned the private computers seized without a warrant, claimed not to need them, and had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure without a warrant;

[17]The Crown stated he needed the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial to be completed and the charges were not withdrawn;

<<Among the many powers of a prosecutor are the following: -- , the power to prosecute, -- , the power to withdraw charges,>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

<<The required element of malice is for all intents, the equivalent of "improper purpose".>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

[18]According the Supreme Court of Canada Judge in R v. Swain assessment order demands before trial infringe upon the equal rights of the mentally disabled under section 15 of the Charter, denies the defense the control over their own defense, can be effectively implemented at the conclusion of trial, and that this ensures that any resulting prejudice and finding of guilt is a result of the defense;

<<I believe, moreover, that conferring on the prosecution a conditional right to raise the issue of insanity during the course of the trial infringes upon the equality rights of the mentally disabled under s. 15 of the Charter. It denies the mentally disabled, a group in our society which has been negatively stereotyped and historically disadvantaged, the control over their defences reposed in other accused persons and does so in a way which is discriminatory. In denying the mentally disabled personal autonomy in decisionmaking it reinforces the stereotype that they are incapable of rational thought and the ability to look after their own interests. In a word, it denies them equality with other accused persons under the guise, putting it at its best, of a benign paternalism. -- It seems to me that the principle advanced in support of the prosecution's right to introduce evidence of insanity can be effectively implemented by having the issue of the accused's insanity raised at the conclusion of the trial in cases where the defences put forward by the accused have been rejected and the essential elements of the offence have been established by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. At that point I think either party should be free to raise the issue of the accused's insanity. I realize, of course, that there is an element of circularity involved in this approach in that insanity has a direct bearing on proof of mens rea. However, I prefer this approach since it both respects the accused's right to waive the defence of insanity and ensures that any resultant prejudice he suffers in the finding of guilt flows from his own decision not to avail himself of the defense and not as a consequence of the prosecution's having raised the issue in the middle of the trial process.”>>;

[19]According to the criminal code and the Supreme Court of British Columbia Honourable Justice Pitfield in R v. Muschke, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony must be presented by the Crown to make a demand for non-criminal responsibility 672.12(3)(b);

 

<<[31] .. recital of what were referred toby the Crown as facts was insufficient for purposes of ss. 672.11 and 672.12, affidavit or viva voce evidence was required,-- [40] In the ordinary course, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony. -- [47] .. In the case ofR. v. Dobrotic, [1995] N.B.J. No. 222 (Q.L.), the New Brunswick Court of Appeal concluded that even with the consent of the accused to assessment, an order should not be made unless there was sufficient evidence before the judge to provide reasonable grounds to doubt the accused's criminal responsibility. -- [48] Even if they could have been relied upon to establish reasonable grounds for belief, the recitation of facts by counsel disclosed unusual and quite possibly unacceptable conduct on the part of the applicant but did not provide reasonable and probable grounds for believing that the accused was incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of his acts in the form of the alleged threats or of knowing that his acts were wrong. -- [51] .. the application was made by the prosecutor pursuant to s. 672.12(3)(b) of the Code.Had fitness been an issue, there was nothing before the judge, whether by statements from counsel or otherwise, which would have justified the formulation of a belief based on reasonable grounds that the applicant, on account of mental disorder, was unable to understand the nature or object of the proceedings in which he was involved, understand the possible consequences of the proceedings, or communicate with counsel.One or more of these factors are necessary in order to formulate an opinion that one is unfit to stand trial as the phrase is defined in s. 2 of the Code. -- [52] It follows that because the initial order was unlawful, the extension was equally invalid. ..-- 672.12 (3)(b);(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if; (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.>>;

[20]Danny Hunt was contesting the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial of February 23, 2011, Motion to Contest Psychological Evaluation For Danny Hunt, on June 13, 2011 when it was renewed and corrected with the right hospital for the assessment order. The assessment order of February 23, 2011 did not contain the correct hospital information, it indicated Albert Prevost instead of CPLM, and was therefore made Out of Jurisdiction according to R v. Creighton; it was corrected or renewed to CPLM on June 13, 2011;

[21]Assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility must be made at the end of trial as to not interfere with the defendant’s defense and inflict a prejudice, the right to be presumed innocent, according to the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Swain, Appeals Court R v Wells, R v Langlois;

[22]NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c. of August 27, 2012; The Right to be Presumed Innocent until Proven Guilty in a Fair Trial section 11(d);

<< Whether assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial 672.12 (1), 672.12 (1)(3) (a), 672.12 (1)(3)(b) that can circumvent the right to a trial, the presentation of charter violation issues, and can make unlawful seizures of private computers legal and abused for these reasons constitutional, <<A guilty verdict without a trial but not criminally responsible>><<The right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal 11(d)>>, or violate s. 7, 8, 9, 11 (b), 11(d), 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;>>

[23]The defenders in the NOTICE OF DENOUNCIATION refer to Nelles v. Ontario 1989 SCC, and claim that the motion to institute proceedings does not contain factual evidence in regards the c) see 3. and d) see 4. Requirement sections: -- that the tort c) the absence of reasonable and probable cause; and d) malice, or a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.

<<2.The Tort of Malicious Prosecution

There are four necessary elements which must be proved for a plaintiff to succeed in an action for malicious prosecution:

a)the proceedings must have been initiated by the defendant;

b)the proceedings must have terminated in favour of the plaintiff;

c)the absence of reasonable and probable cause;

d)malice, or a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

<<Among the many powers of a prosecutor are the following: -- , the power to prosecute, -- , the power to withdraw charges,>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

<<The required element of malice is for all intents, the equivalent of "improper purpose".>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

[24]c) the absence of reasonable and probable cause; involves fabricating criminal allegations from a published Mobbing Research article on February 21, 2011 and the Freedom of Expression, a Charter Violation Issue and a part of the NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c.; the Crown asked for the trial date to be April 13, 2012 on November 9, 2011;

<< <<Among the many powers of a prosecutor are the following: -- , the power to prosecute, -- , the power to withdraw charges,>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

<<On November 9, 2011 the Crown asked for the trial date to be April 13, 2012;>>

<<Me -- : -- Et je vais vous suggerer le treize (13) avril deux mille douze (2012) en salle 1.10.>> page 14 of Nov 9, 2012 transcript >>

[25]d) malice, or a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect; involves The Right to be Presumed Innocent until Proven Guilty by a Fair Trial 11(d), the Crown’s demand for assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that do not conform to the criminal code procedure specifications and requirements, the high risk of success mentioned in [12] a disability, mental illness, a vulnerability, claims of being assaulted with cancer causing powerful radar and radiation technology during the criminal proceedings, the success of the assessment order before trial would circumvent the right to a trial and the presentation of charter violation issues presented at trial, and a Charter Violation Issue that is part of the NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c. of August 27, 2012;

<<non-criminal responsibility before trial involves The Right to be Presumed Innocent until Proven Guilty by a Fair Trial 11(d),>>

<<Further, it should be noted that in many, if not all cases of malicious prosecution by an Attorney General or Crown Attorney, there will have been an infringement of an accused's rights as guaranteed by ss. 7 and 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

<<The required element of malice is for all intents, the equivalent of "improper purpose".>> Nelles v. Ontario, [1989]

[26]Danny Hunt attempted to contest the assessment order on May 24, 2011, June 13, 2011, and Appeal the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial at the Appeals Court and Superior Court from July 20, 2011 to October 14, 2011 for no supporting evidence being provided for demand by way of affidavit or by testimony, R v Muschke, R v Dobrotic; that the demand for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility must be made at the end of trial according to R v Swain SCC, R v Wells, R v Langlois; on Oct 21, 2011 that by specifying the wrong hospital the assessment order was made out of jurisdiction R v Creighton, which included an Abuse of Process Motion;

[27]The Crown declared the assessment order expired at the Court of Appeals on October 14, 2011, an Appeal concerning the Crown making the demand before trial R v. Swain and without providing any evidence by way of affidavit or testimony as indicated in R v. Muschke, R v. Dobrotic;

[28]The Appeal R v. Creighton of October 21, 2011 that was combined with a motion for Abuse of Process “ceased to exist” according to Superior Court Judge -- , resulting in the Abuse of Process motion being made Out of Jurisdiction at the Superior Court without the Appeal R v. Creighton;

[29]The Crown stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial on October 21, 2011;

[30]The Crown on November 9, 2011 stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial but required the testimony of a psychiatrist as indicated in R v. Muschke and R v Dobrotic “application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony”, which he did not do on February 23, 2011 and on June13, 2011;

<<Me -- : Bien, la problematigue c’est que je dois… -- … je dois communiquer avec son psychiatre parce que monsieur etait… il avait eu une… il y avait eu une ordonnance, la… -- … pour que monsieur soit… se fasse evaluer. -- Et le delai de soixante (60) jours etait termine pour cette ordonnance-la et l’evaluation est pas terminee. -- Et monsieur conteste cette ordonnance-la, donc je sais que je devrai assigner la psychiatre pour qu’elle vienne temoigner sur l’etat de monsieur afin de demontrer au Tribunal qu’il y a des motifs, la, pour soupeser cette demande d’ordonnance la. – Sauf que j’ai pas encore communique avec le psychiatre parce que c’est pas necessairement facile. – Et j’esperais, la, que le dix-huit (18) novembre j’aurais les dates de disponibilite de la psychiatre pour qu’on puisse fixer une audition.>>;

[31]On November 9, 2011 the Lower Court Judge ordered a trial over the objections of the demander and the Crown asked for the trial date to be April 13, 2012;

<<Me -- : -- Et je vais vous suggerer le treize (13) avril deux mille douze (2012) en salle 1.10.>> page 14 of Nov 9, 2012 transcript

[32]On December 21, 2011 Danny Hunt presented a professionally written motion to destroy any existing copies of the seized computers. The Crown stated that the computers were returned, that no data copies of the seized computers exist, and therefore no order to destroy any copies can be issued, no object for the order exists;

[33]On January 12, 2012 at the Superior Court the Crown stated again that the computers were returned, that no copies were made,that there is no object to issue an order for the destruction of any existing computer copies; the Crown had not refuted his burden of proof for the seizure of computers without a warrant, a charter violation;

[34]The defendants understanding of the legal consequences; if the Crown is mistaken and the Police do have copies the defendant would have to sue the Crown for damages in Civil Court; If an order was issued any existing copies resulting from the seizure by the police would be illegal, which is a considerable difference;

[35]To the Crowns knowledge there are no copies, and therefor there is no object for the demand for destruction of any existing copies to be destroyed, which would make any resulting copies from the seizure illegal; is it possible in different scenarios such as another Police organization to obtained copies through a sealed investigation during the -- Police vacation period;

[36]NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c. of August 27, 2012; Unreasonable Search and Seizure section 8, the Right to Security of the Person;

<< Whether the seizure of private computers without a warrant that involves private information and data such as passwords, contact lists, banking information, and personal information that are simply returned later with the claim that no copies were made, which removes the ability to issue an order to destroy any existing copies making any existing copies from the seizure illegal, <<no object to issue the order>><<unreasonable search and seizure s. 8 and the right to security of the person s. 7>>, constitutional or violate s. 7, 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;>>

[37]On June 4, 2012 one Charter violation issue raised was the seizure of computers without a warrant that the Crown had not refuted his burden of proof for, unreasonable search and seizure under section 8 of the Charter; the Judge made an error in his Judgment when he states the computers were said to belong to the demanders father; it is clearly stated in the -- Police report that they were seizing the computers of Danny Hunt;

<<14h50 Pere du PRE arrive sur les lieux -- , .. , -- 15h40 l’agt 991 saisie le materiel informatiques du PRE -- , .. ,>> Rapport D’Enquete Complementaire page 3 of 5

[38]The Police members involved on February 21, 2011 and April 6, 2011 Notice for Fire Arms Restrictions did not seem to be the same Police members on April 13, 2012, and the Police members of April 13, 2012 did not seem to be the same Police members on June 4, 2012; During the proceedings the demander Danny Hunt did not question this fact for the reasons already mentioned, a disability, mental illness, a vulnerability but now that he has been acquitted does not know the implications or consequences of this observation;

[39]The DENOUCIATION NOTICE of one of the defenders claims the civil proceedings are prescribed and wish the content of the proceedings to be rejected completely or in parts;

[40]The defenders both stated on April 24, 2012 that under law the civil proceedings could not proceed until there was an acquittal, the acquittal was on June 4, 2012;

[41]Such further and other grounds as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC

NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.p.c.

SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2012

[42]Whether assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial 672.12 (1), 672.12 (1)(3) (a), 672.12 (1)(3)(b) that can circumvent the right to a trial, the presentation of charter violation issues, and can make unlawful seizures of private computers legal and abused for these reasons constitutional, <<A guilty verdict without a trial but not criminally responsible>><<The right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal 11(d)>>, or violate s. 7, 8, 9, 11 (b), 11(d), 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

The Canadian criminal code:

672.12 (1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or, subject to subsections (2) and (3), on application of the prosecutor.

(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if

(a) the accused puts his or her mental capacity for criminal intent into issue; or

(b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.

264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;

(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights charters specify that everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a fair trial section 11(d), non-criminal responsibility before trial circumvents this.

Non-criminally responsible before trial is like being found guilty of the criminal allegations without a trial but not criminally responsible due to mental illness. This means that if the Police enter and search your home without a warrant, seize your computers without a warrant, and the allegations are false and violate the freedom of expression, this is now all justified. No charter violation issues presented at trial and no trial, you've been found guilty before trial through non-criminal responsibility and the seizure of computers without a warrant is now legal too, which means that computer copies can also be used for more criminal allegations.

[43]Whether the seizure of private computers without a warrant that involves private information and data such as passwords, contact lists, banking information, and personal information that are simply returned later with the claim that no copies were made, which removes the ability to issue an order to destroy any existing copies making any existing copies from the seizure illegal, <<no object to issue the order>><<unreasonable search and seizure s. 8 and the right to security of the person s. 7>>, constitutional or violate s. 7, 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

[44]Whether the publication of a research article that is identified as a research article that causes a person to receive a threat 264.1 (1)(a)(2)(b),<<in any manner causes any person to receive a threat>>, resulting in incarceration and criminal allegations violates the freedom of expression s. 2(b);

EVIDENCE SUBMITTAL:

[45]Charter Issues 2(b), 7, 8, 11(b), 11(d), 15 booklet;

[46]Human Rights Defender Booklet:

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL FEB 23, 2011 – NOV 9, 2011 APPEALS AND DELAYS

SHORT DOCUMENTS PRESENTATION AUGUST 14, 2012

[47]Human Rights Defender Booklet:

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL

UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE

WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND CHARTER INFRINGMENT

REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY

SHORT DOCUMENTS PRESENTATION (2nd)

[48]Human Rights Defender Booklet:

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

PSYCHOLOGICAL HARASSMENT INFORMATION ASSOCIATION

MOBBING RESEARCH CNN IREPORT ARTICLE OF FEB 21, 2011

-- POLICE REPORT

SEIZURE OF PRIVATE COMPUTERS WITHOUT A WARRANT

-- POLICE DEMAND FOR INCARCERATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION

ASSESSMENT ORDERS FOR NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FEBRUARY 23, 2011 AND JUNE 13, 2011

[49]Human Rights Defender Booklet:

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

PSYCHOLOGICAL HARASSMENT INFORMATION ASSOCIATION

MOTION TO CONTEST PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION MAY 24, 2011 - JUNE 13, 2011

APPEAL, R V. MUSCHKE, R V. SWAIN, OF OCTOBER 14, 2011 AT APPEALS COURT

APPEAL, R V. CREIGHTON, OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 AT SUPERIOR COURT

ABUSE OF PROCESS MOTION OF OCTOBER 21, 2011 AT SUPERIOR COURT

[50]Human Rights Complaint Bootket:

To: OHCHR freedom of expression mandate, human rights defenders mandate, Petitions Team 1 - 4

Which includes:

Transcripts of February 23, 2011, May 24, 2011, October 21, 2011, November 9, 2011, January 12, 2012, April 13, 2012, Police Report Documents, the Assessment Orders of February 23, 2011 and June 13, 2011 for non-criminal responsibility before trial, the February 21, 2011 CNN iReport Mobbing Research article, the June 4, 2012 JUDGMENT FOR CHARTER ISSUES SECTION 2(B), 7, 8, 11(B), 11(D), 15(1),

[51]Exhibits 1-17 Booklet;

[52]Affidavit; and

[53] Such further and other material as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

FOR THESE MOTIVES, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:

ORDER the -- Police members involved in these proceedings to identify themselves with identification before a Superior Court Judge;

ORDER the -- Police members involved in these proceedings to confirm their participation in the criminal proceedings of April 13, 2012 and June 4, 2012;

ORDER the preliminary measures rescheduled to five weeks to give time to the Attorney General of Quebec to respond to the NOTICE OF INTENTION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 95 C.c.p. scheduled for presentation on September 25, 2012, a public interest;

ORDER the preliminary measures rescheduled to five weeks to give time to the Commission des Droits de la Personne time to repond as to if the complaint will be submitted to and addressed by the Tribunal of Human Rights, a public interst;

ORDER the preliminary measures rescheduled to five weeks to give time for the demander to obtain the transcript of April 24, 2012;

DECLARE that the criminal allegations fabricated from a published February21, 2011Mobbing Research article on CNN iReport is a clear case and violation of the freedom of expression;

DECLARE that assessment order demands for non-criminal responsibility must be made at the end of trial as indicated in R v Swain SCC, R v Wells, R v Langlois;

DECLARE that assessment order demands must be made with supporting evidence by way of affidavit or testimony as indicated in R v Muschke and R v Dobrotic;

DECLARE that the abuse of non-criminal responsibility before trial can be used for the following:

<< The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights charters specify that everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a fair trial section 11(d), non-criminal responsibility before trial circumvents this.

Non-criminally responsible before trial is like being found guilty of the criminal allegations without a trial but not criminally responsible due to mental illness. This means that if the Police enter and search your home without a warrant, seize your computers without a warrant, and the allegations are false and violate the freedom of expression, this is now all justified. No charter violation issues presented at trial and no trial, you've been found guilty before trial through non-criminal responsibility and the seizure of computers without a warrant is now legal too, which means that computer copies can also be used for more criminal allegations.>>

DECLARE that there is enough supporting evidence for the proceedings to continue;

DISSMISS the Denounciations of the defenders;

GRANT the submittal of the evidence specified in this Motion and Exhibits 1-27;

GRANT the orders;

GRANT the declarations;

THE WHOLE with costs.

PLEASE ACT ACCORDINGLY

 

 

BLOG

Journal Entry Sept 3, 2012

Recent radar attenuation purchases, 2' x 4' metal plates, white enamel paint, travertine stone. The radar assaults from both sides of the home and back at 558 Felix Laval Quebec have increased following the posting about non-criminal responsibility before trial, which circumvents the right to a trial. The assaults hit the bone and are probably linked to bone cancer along with the focus on the shins linked to bone marrow damage and leukemia.

 

Journal Entry Sept 3, 2012 Valid Allegations?

On April 12, 2011 when the Crown returned my computers and said no data analysis was needed he said now all he needed was the non-criminal responsibility to be completed. I did not want this assessment for non-criminal responsibility because I knew I was completely innocent and began attempts to Appeal it. The interesting part, after the lower court judge dismissed all the charter issues that were raised, which include the freedom of expression, searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computers without a warrant, and the Crown not justifying the seizure of private computers without a warrant at trial the Police members stated that they still believed that the allegations were true on June 4, 2012.

On a long term I'll probably get sick, which is different from simply disappearing in homelessness. The point is that I'm disappointed by the human rights organizations lack of response.

 

Journal Entry Sept 4, 2012 Pattern and Fax Calls Re-Routing, Communications Interception?

During the criminal proceedings from Feb 21, 2011 to Jun 4, 2012 I was even more sleep deprived through HSS Hypersonic Sound or LRAD focused ultrasound type of technology before court appearances and assaulted with cancer causing powerful radar even more during the morning of court appearances when you have to prepare, eat, shower, and move around the house a lot instead of being behind protective shielding.

When I would send communication fax calls to human rights organizations outside of Canada my calls would hangup, the CSID would change to a generic CSID of G3, which leads me to believe they were re-routed or intercepted. I believe another pattern is the generic CSID G3 first, hanging up the line, and then coping the receivers CSID. In some cases, long distance calls, most of the fax would be received and then hangup before completion. I recently communicated with Pro-Bono Quebec to see if they can assist with the article 95 and Charter of Rights and Freedoms and they had a generic G3 ID.

 

Journal Entry Sept 4, 2012 Powerful Radar Assaults a Long Term Poison, Hidden Homicides

The powerful radar assaults aimed at the shin bone to inflict bone marrow damage, the lungs to inflame, irritate, damage, and scar the lungs, that hit the bone with possible links to bone cancer, and the testicles linked to damaging the testicles and testosterone production is line a poison linked to serious illness and deadly cancers on a long term, hidden homicides.

 

Journal Entry Sept 5, 2012 Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Circumventing a Trial

All the British regimes may have the same "hole" to circumvent a trial through non-criminal responsibility before trial. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and human rights charters specify that everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a fair trial section 11(d), non-criminal responsibility before trial circumvents this.

Non-criminally responsible before trial is like being found guilty of the criminal allegations without a trial but not criminally responsible due to mental illness. This means that if the Police enter and search your home without a warrant, seize your computers without a warrant, and the allegations are false and violate the freedom of expression, this is now all justified. No charter violation issues presented at trial and no trial, you've been found guilty before trial through non-criminal responsibility and the seizure of computers without a warrant is now legal too, which means that computer copies can also be used for more criminal allegations.

This "hole" may be linked to the use of technology such as powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, public places, and court house too during long and delayed criminal proceedings to encourage the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial.

 

Journal Entry Sept 5, 2012 Human Rights Organizations and Politics

I have been trying to file complaints with the Justice Minister, Commission des Droits de la Personne, High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Amnesty International, .. , for many months with no response. I get the impression that they know the "game" of these regimes that claim to be law abiding and human rights supporting. Given time and delays the targeted citizens lose their means of subsistence, which is linked to homelessness. Those who are assaulted with powerful radar assaults run away, recaptured, and incarcerated during the proceedings and found guilty through non-criminal responsibility before trial or at trial.

 

Journal Entry Sept 6, 2012 Notice of Intention According to Article 95 C.p.c.

Two different notices were given on August 23 and 24, and this one on August 27 to the Attorney General of Quebec, Duty Justice Minister of Canada, Criminal Pursuits Director of the new Laval District, .. ,

 

Journal Entry Sept 6, 2012 Police Imposters in Court?

It seems to me that the Police members involved on Feb 21, 2011 were different people in their appearance in court on April 13, 2012 and different people from April 13, 2012 on Jun 4, 2012. Why and how is this possible, testifying and going to trial, I do not know.

 

Journal Entry Sept 6, 2012 Notice to Rejection Motion to Institute Proceedings

I have received Notices to Reject the Motion to Institute Proceedings from the two parties involved. One claims that there is no evidence to support the motion and the other claims that it is prescribed (time/delay) by city laws, and to reject it completely or in part.

Theory: The claim that it is prescribed and to be rejected in part may be link to the strange phenomenon of imposters at a later time, April 13, 2012 and June 4, 2012, that would be included and where the period of time that involves the real Police members on Feb 21, 2011 would be dropped or rejected.

 

Journal Entry Sept 8, 2012 Police Members Imposters on April 13 and June 4, 2012?

The second motion is to respond to the defenders motions to reject the civil lawsuit and proceedings.

In the motion it mentions that the Police members involved were not the same people, they were imposters, and now that I have been acquitted I would like to know why. The Judge before trial also dismissed several charter violation issues that were raised, in the second motion I focus more on the freedom of expression and an error that involves the seizure without warrant of private computers.

 

Journal Entry Sept 8, 2012 Repression Through Serious Illness and Cancer

I purchased bags of white marble to attenuate powerful radar assaults.

This is a part that people do not see, repression, mobbing, involves the use of radar and radiation technology to inflict serious illness and cancer during this period of time when people are already overwhelmed financially with false allegations and criminal proceedings, and during the a civil lawsuit proceeding to recover the financial loss.

It is a combination of expensive legal fees and services, transcripts to Appeal wrongful orders, , etc. combined with the need to purchase expensive radar attenuating materials metal plating, lead, marble (dolomite), dolomitic limestone, travertine, liquid bottles (focused ultrasound shielding), etc,.

 

Journal Entry Sept 8, 2012 Freedom of Expression s. 2(b) and Criminal Allegations s. 264

According the Charter Issue Judgment of June 4, 2012 the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Freedom of Expression 2(b) does not protect citizens from criminal allegations s. 264 fabricated from published articles that are identified as research articles, Mobbing Research, and the Freedom of Expression 2(b) Charter Issue is dismissed. This is why I seek to address this criminal law 264 that seems to violate the Charter through article 95 C.p.c.

 

Journal Entry Sept 9, 2012 Supreme Court of Canada, Cyberbullying and Freedom of Expression

I watched part of the Supreme Court of Canada this morning about Cyberbullying and Freedom of Expression on CPAC.

This case involves the creator and founder of the only English website that involves psychological harassment, Psychological Harassment Information Association, that includes cyberbullying and mobbing, a Mobbing Research article, and freedom of expression.

An issue that I believe the Supreme Court Judges are aware of that involves legislation is that good intentions at the Supreme Court Level regarding censorship can result in miss applications and abuse at the lower court levels. (freedom of expression and censorship).

In my case, I am isolated and attacked through organized crime. The court proceedings include wrongful orders and Charter Issue judgments errors. My only tool in the pursuit of the truth and justice to break this isolation is through communication and publication, freedom of expression 2(b).

 

Journal Entry Sept 9, 2012 Crown Immune to Prosecution and Police Imposters

One issue is that there were many motions and Appeals before the Crown requested the date of April 13, 2012 for the trial on Nov 9. 2011 that involved the freedom of expression and the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial that if successful would circumvent the right to a trial section 11(d).

Another issue that I do not fully understand, the Police members on April 13, 2012 and June 4, 2012 were imposters, they were not the same people, which is linked to the vulnerability mentioned in the Motion. A possible theory is that the Crown is immune to prosecution and the Police members are not, resulting in imposters.

 

Journal Entry Sept 9, 2012 Supreme Court of Canada vs Private Sector Cyberbullying Reporting System

I believe that the combination of school, government, and cyberspace private sector is the solution to cyberbullying and not censoreship legislation linked to the Charter freedom of expression 2(b). A Bullying or Cyberbullying Reporting System that is combined with the Cyberspace Communities existing efforts to prevent cyberbullying and ban offenders. (see the Bullying or Cyberbullying Reporting System page)

 

Journal Entry Sept 9, 2012 Crown Immunity and Police Imposters, Strategy?

On Nov 9, 2012 the Crown requested the date April 13, 2012 for the trial. The civil lawsuit notice was before Feb 21, 2012. On April 13, 2012 a different Crown Prosecutor was involved and from what I observed the Police members were now imposters. On June 4, 2012 the Police member imposters were different from the imposters of April 13, 2012.

The original Crown of Feb 21, 2011 to Nov 9, 2011 and Jan 12, 2012 involved in the civil lawsuits claims an immunity with difficult requirements. Theory, if the requirements fail this would leave only the Police members who would then claim they were not involved or present on April 13, 2012 and June 4, 2012.

 

 

 

 

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Links to Smear Campaigns - CNN iReport (article link)

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-808083

The defendant was accused of uttering threats towards women in a Mobbing Research article on Feb 21, 2011, released on conditions on Feb 23, 2011, and acquitted on Jun 4, 2012. The Police made a demand that he remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation based on these factors 1. no criminal record 2. a disability, mental illness 3. in 2003 reported believing having caused the death of a girl when a minor, non-criminal responsible. In 2003 a criminal harassment network's participants led him to the belief that he reported, resulting in criminal charges by the Surete du Quebec. He was released with a Crown Prosecutor assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial. If successful the defendant's Police record would now include:
3. in 2003 reported believing having caused the death of girl when a minor, non-criminal responsible
4. in 2011 uttered threats towards women on facebook, non-criminal responsible (update Aug 1)

Some details:

NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL

On Feb 23, 2011 the defendant had to accept the non-criminal responsibility before trial or remain incarcerated. When he began to question this assessment order the judge asked him if he accepted the condition for release or not, which meant that if he didn't he would remain incarcerated.

On Jun 13, 2011 the defendant was contesting the non-criminal responsibility assessment order, he was told that he was not complying with the conditions for release and threatened with incarceration again. The non-criminal responsibility assessment order was corrected with the correct hospital or renewed, which is linked to the Oct 21, 2011 R v Creighton Appeal.

There were different Appeals for the assessment order, one involved R v Muschke, the need for evidence by the Crown to make this demand, R v Swain, the demand must be made at the end of trial, and the Crown making this demand over the objections of the accused on Oct 14, 2011 at the Court of Appeals; And one to set aside the assessment order because it contained the wrong hospital information and therefor made out of jurisdiction R v Creighton on Oct 21, 2011 at the Superior Court.

The Crown declared the assessment order expired on Oct 14, 2011 at the Court of Appeals, the defendant added a motion for Abuse of Process to the Appeal R v Creighton at the Superior Court for Oct 21, 2011. On Oct 21, 2011 the Appeal R v Creighton "ceased to exist" at the Superior Court, which results in the motion for Abuse of Process being Out of Jurisdiction without the Appeal. The Crown stated again that the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility was expired, which resulted in the Superior Court judge saying "it, the Appeal, "ceased to exist" because it is expired". The Superior Court judge never received the Appeal possibly because the Court House staff feared she would put a stop to the proceedings for Abuse of Process.

On Oct 21, 2011 at the Superior Court the Crown Prosecutor claimed that he wanted to renew the expired assessment order. On Nov 9, 2011 the Crown Prosecutor claimed he wanted to renew the assessment order again, which the defendant pointed out that he could not do. The Judge ordered a trial over the objections of the defendant that the Crown Prosecutor is supposed ask for and did not ask for. Trial set to Apr 13, 2012, several Charter Issues presented on Apr 13, 2012, Charter Issues Judgments given on Jun 4, 2012, which was followed by the trial. The defendant was acquitted on Jun 4, 2012.

Note: the Abuse of Process motion of Oct 21, 2011 also indicated that the defendant was subjected to unusual cruel treatment, radiation technology and powerful radar assaults linked to deadly cancers such as lung cancer and leukemia during these long criminal proceedings.

Section 12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

HUOT?

The name of the defendant was misspelled on the criminal mischief allegations of 2003-2004 by the Surete du Quebec to Mr. Danny HUOT (see http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-815326). In the 2011 criminal proceedings the criminal court clerk's name is Ms. HUOT, she confirmed that three motions, which includes the Appeal R v Creighton to set aside the assessment order was received and sent to the Superior Court Judge for Oct 21, 2011. On Oct 21, 2011 the Appeal was missing. (see English translation 3:15, "this contains three motions, right?" "yes, that's right" http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-696923 and 4:05, "you've sent these to the judge" "all the files, the judge likes to have all the files ahead of time" http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-696789)

COMPUTER COPIES AND NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL

In March following the release on conditions of Feb 23, 2011, the defendant sent notice for a motion of restitution of the seized computers to be presented on Mar 9, 2011. On Feb 21, 2011 the Police entered the dwelling home of the defendant without a warrant and seized his computers without a warrant. When the defendant attempted to deposit the motion with evidence, the published article said to utter threats towards women, the clerk refused to take the motion and evidence claiming the defendant could not submit evidence against himself. The defendant stated that he was representing himself and had a right to submit what he wished, in this case evidence along with a restitution of property motion. With evidence provided by the defendant the Police do not need to keep and search the computers for evidence.

On Mar 9, 2011 the Police left for vacation until about Mar 23, 2011 and the Crown Prosecutor could not attend, the motion had to be rescheduled for Apr 12, 2011 where the motion for restitution was granted and computers returned. The Crown Prosecutor claimed no analysis of data would be needed.

In December the defendant presented a professionally written motion for the destruction of any existing copies in any form from the seizure of the computers. The Crown Prosecutor stated that there were no copies and the judge claimed that she could not order the destruction of copies that do not exist. The defendant Appealed this decision at the Superior Court on Jan 12, 2012, the professionally written motion is clear, an order to destroy any existing copies, the defendant does not need to prove the existence of these aka "you cannot prove the Police have copies". The Appeal was dismissed at the Superior Court; the Crown Prosecutor stated again that there were no copies.

The Police and Crown Prosecutor still had not justified the seizure of the computers without a warrant, a charter violation, and the Crown Prosecutor stated that he did not need them and did not have copies.

From the understanding of the defendant, the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial would have made valid the false criminal allegations and the seizure of the private computers without a warrant legal, which could have made him vulnerable to other criminal allegations. What he also believes to understand is that if the Crown Prosecutor was mistaken concerning the Police having copies resulting in other criminal allegations, he would have to file a civil lawsuit against the Crown Prosecutor for damages from prison, incarceration. An order by the court to destroy any existing copies would make the possession of any copies resulting from the seizure of the computers illegal, a considerable difference.

CHARTER ISSUES

There were several Charter Issues presented on Apr 13, 2012. Freedom of Expression, Supreme Court Judgment R v Keegstra includes uttering threats as part of the freedom of express. The Mobbing Research article was published on CNN iReport on Feb 21, 2011 before the arrest and shared on Facebook, the C-SPAN discussion area. The defendant had a theory as to why the Supreme Court of Canada Judges included uttering threats in this judgment. If criminal allegations were to be used to give a journalist "problems" for an article that the Police disapproved of, this would be the allegation used. This Charter Issue was dismissed. The Police claimed that under the circumstances they did not have time to request a warrant to enter and search the home without a warrant, even though they went to a previous address first and communicated with their station several times, which means to the defendant that they could have requested one. This Charter Issue was dismissed. The Police seized the defendant's computers without a warrant and this was never justified in court by the Crown Prosecutor. Somehow on Jun 4, 2012 when the judge gave his judgments for these six Charter Issues he states that the defendant's father said the computers belonged to him, and not the defendant, along with permission to take the computers. This Charter Issue was dismissed. ,,..,

SETTING STATUTES IN COURT

No statutes were set for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial or the Charter Issues, a trial was held and the defendant acquitted.

FINANCIAL COST, OVERWHELMED

The defendant found himself facing three major costs that overwhelmed his finances. 1) The cost for rent, 2) the cost for costly legal criminal proceedings ($300 to $400 per hour), and 3) costly shielding and attenuation materials (iron sheets, lead, aluminum, ferric and carbon/graphite slate tiles) from powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes. The cost for rent was eliminated when he took refuge at his parents’ home but created a problem, he was not allowed to shield himself inside their home, so his van was turned into a faraday cage where he stayed and slept during sixteen months including winter, which was reinforced as the months went by with the shielding materials.

CIVIL LAWSUIT AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM

After a long and expensive criminal allegation proceedings once acquitted the defendant has to file a civil lawsuit in the same jurisdiction, judicial system, and court house to recover the costs and damages from these false allegations, while still being assaulted with radiation technology and powerful radar.

RAGE SHOOTING FACTORS AND MARC LEPINE

The Mobbing Research article concerns people "hitting back" for different reasons and committing terrible crimes, Marc Lepine being one of them. It involves the possibility that the mob may have written Marc Lepine's suicide note to hide the cause, abuse and the use of homelessness as a weapon. It is a strange fact that the defendant believes he has been subjected to the same type of abuse, false allegations, a large financial loss that may not be recoverable, stress and sleep deprivation, damaged personal relationships, other related hardships such as spending several months in a van, and assaulted with deadly cancer causing technology during these long criminal and civil lawsuit proceedings.

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

There are several human rights violation linked to these proceedings according to the defendant, 1. Circumventing the right to a trial and serious charter violation through the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial. 2. The use of radiation technology and powerful radar to assault citizens in their own homes linked to attempts to inflict deadly cancers such as lung cancer and leukemia. Making the ability to function during the criminal proceedings impossible or harder, similar to the use of high levels of sleep deprivation to make it impossible or harder for a person to function. Repressing citizens through the use of sound or ultrasound technology, high levels of sleep deprivation, radiation technology, powerful radar, and serious illness, cancer. Suspected list of countries along Canada, Great Britain, and Australia.

TECHNOLOGY AND CRIMINAL HARASSMENT

In 2003-2004 reported believing having caused the death of girl when a minor, what a criminal harassment network led him to believe. Criminal allegations of criminal mischief by the Surete du Quebec, non-criminal responsible.

In 2007 the start of high levels of sleep deprivation through sound technology from neighboring homes, HSS Hypersonic Sound or LRAD type of technology, which was combined with the criminal harassment network participants who used threats to induce stress, cortisol, and adrenaline, which leads to potassium depletion, acid-base imbalance, and calcium depletion.

In 2010 the start of radiation technology and powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes linked to deadly cancer such as lung cancer and leukemia, which are combined with the criminal allegations of 2011, uttering threats towards women. Threats of Police intervention and threats of intervention from criminal harassment participants, which are linked to incarceration, protection measures, and discouraging this protection measures behavior or action.

In 2011 criminal allegations of uttering threats towards women in a facebook CSPAN discussion post, a shared published Mobbing Research article, not guilty.

(2007-2011) A criminal harassment routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived through sound technology (HSS), criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor, and attempts at repetitive humiliation.

(2011-2012) The threat of intervention is linked to behavior, protection measures against the powerful radar assaults, and personal hygiene that begins to suffer due to attempts to avoid these. -- So the public criminal harassment routine of threats to induce cortisol and adrenaline, trying to standing directly behind the victim at the cash register, and interpret the voice fluctuations as fear is changed to threats of intervention, participants trying to smell the victim, saying "he smells bad", .. and every criminal harassment participant is an undercover psychiatrist who wants to intervene and incarcerate the defendant, the victim of criminal harassment. -- The criminal allegations are combined with radiation technology and powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, public places, and court house too. Criminal harassment participants who use words such as "turn over" and interpret criminal harassment, stress, and sleep deprivation as "wearing a person down" now attempt to give the victim of criminal harassment deadly cancers such lung cancer and leukemia through repetitive radiation technology and powerful radar assaults.

POLICE INTERVENTION

The Police attempted or discussed intervention three or more times, calls concerning "suspicious vehicles" at the defendants home when he took refuge in his van from the radiation technology assaults and linked to the defendant's behavior, shielding and attenuation measures, the defendant attempting to protect himself and trying to avoid these assaults from neighboring homes. Police intervention would lead to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and the non-criminal responsibility assessment order. This is before the assessment order was said to be expired by the Crown Prosecutor at the Appeals Court on Oct 14, 2011,

NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL SUMMARY

Non-criminal responsibility before trial helps escape charter violations and false allegations or sanctions them, makes them valid, and can make the seizure of private computers without a warrant valid too, the accused did commit the crime but is not criminally responsible due to mental illness. It is before the Charter Issue presentations, charter violations such as entering a home without a warrant or freedom of expression and therefore escapes or circumvents the charter violations like the trial, the accused does not get a trial.

Radiation technology and powerful radar assaults combined with the criminal proceedings help obtain non-criminal responsibility before trial, the psychological evaluation with claims of being assaulted with "microwaves", and the idea is that if you do not take non-criminal responsibility before trial, which makes the proceedings shorter and less costly, if you fight this assessment order, you expose yourself to long and delayed criminal proceedings while being assaulted by these cancer causing technologies. The criminal proceedings are then followed by long and delayed civil lawsuits to recover the costs of these expensive criminal proceedings, in the same judicial system or jurisdiction, and under the same conditions. -- Repressing targeted citizens through serious illness, cancer.

With the exposure of this type of abuse perhaps it will lead to changes and safe guards. There is another effect; participating defense lawyers escape notice given the fact that there is no trial. With the elimination of this abuse to circumvent the right to a trial the performance of defense lawyers is visible and subject to complaints. -- The non-criminal responsibility assessment order before trial puts the defendant on the defensive when faced with radiation technology and powerful radar assaults, threats of intervention that leads to incarceration and the assessment order, which helps prevent exposing the use of these during the criminal proceedings.

UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Laval Police 2011 - (uttering threats towards women)

Transcript Feb 23, 2011 and May 24, 2011

On Feb 23, 2011 the defense lawyer presented to the defendant told him he had no choice but to remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation following the Laval Police demand. Even after having explained that the allegations were false and fabricated from a Mobbing Research article published on CNN iReport, and that he was the creator and founder of Psychological Harassment Information Association. The defendant dismissed the services of this defense lawyer to represent himself.

The defense lawyer later returned claiming he was under the service of the defendant's mother, Cecile Hunt, and that he would be released on conditions, the defendant accepted. In court the conditions were read, he understood them, and another condition was added for a psychological evaluation for non-criminal responsibility. The defendant was not advised of this condition and he was confused by it, having explained his case, innocence, and intentions to the defense lawyer but had to accept this condition to be released.

The defendant believes that the Laval Police demand for evaluation, the defense lawyer who advised him that he had no choice but to remain incarcerated for this evaluation, and the following Crown Prosecutor demand for non-criminal responsibility before trial were part of some kind of setup to sanction the false allegations, to circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms violations, the search of a dwelling home without a warrant, the seizure of computers without a warrant, and to make the seizure of private information, the computers, legal.

On May 24 - May 31 the defendant believes that the Lower Court Judges and Crown Prosecutor attempted to deceive him as to who made the demand for non-criminal responsibility before trial, a demand by the Crown Persecutor before trial is a violation of the criminal code. They seemed to want to indicate that Honorable Judge Lauzon on Feb 23, 2011 was the one who had made the demand and issued the assessment order.

On Jun 13, 2011 Judge Lauzon stated that it was clear that the Crown Prosecutor had made the demand even though the Crown Prosecutor later claimed that the demand was a mutual one. On Jun 13, 2011 the defendant was contesting the assessment order, threatened with incarceration for not complying with the conditions for release, and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial was recreated with the proper hospital information, which is linked to the Appeal of Oct 21, 2011 R v Creighton that "ceased to exist".

Surete du Quebec 2003 - (criminal mischief)

In 2003 I reported what a criminal harassment network led me to believe, that I had caused the death of Celine Hardy, the twin sister of Stephan Hardy, a team mate on the Laval Swimming Club, during a swimming meet somewhere in Quebec, at around 1984-1985, when I was about 16-17 years old.

This criminal harassment network wanted me to believe that I was being framed for murder, "who told you", and wanted me to run away and be a "psychological" fugitive for a crime that I didn't commit. Instead I reported it to the Surete du Quebec. When Celine Hardy was found alive and her twin brother Stephan Hardy didn't exist or ceased to exist, it led to criminal allegations of criminal mischief. I found myself having to prove that I had caused her death to be found innocent of criminal mischief, a form of criminal harassment network setup.

The criminal allegations of 2003-2004 led to non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness, which was later used in 2011 to make a demand that I remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation by the Laval Police, along with 1. no criminal record, 2. a disability, mental illness, and *3. 2003 non-criminal responsible of criminal mischief.

THE DEFENDANTS PSYCHOLOGICAL VIEW

I was sure to lose the Appeal at the Appeals Court on Oct 14 due to a technicality and I believed I would win the Appeal at the Superior Court on Oct 21, setting a statute. The Crown Prosecutor stated the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility expired at the Appeals Court where I was sure to lose, possibly knowing that I was sure to win on Oct 21 and thought this would eliminate this Appeal too. After the Oct 14 Appeals Court I added an Abuse of Process motion to the Superior Court Appeal of Oct 21 and the Appeal “ceased to exist” making this motion Out of Jurisdiction etc.,,. On Oct 14 when the Crown Prosecutor stated the assessment order expired that they were trying to force on me through threats of incarceration and court house obstructions leading to long delays, which are linked to increasing the risk of incarceration to complete the assessment order, is the day the non-criminal responsibility before trial plan came crashing down. After this day all the Crown Prosecutor did is keep repeating that he wanted to renew the assessment order, which he could not do, and a judge ordered a trial that he did not ask for.

STRATEGY PATTERNS AND ILLUSTRATIONS

I do not know of any other strategy to circumvent charter violations and the right to a fair trial.

1. Non-Criminal Responsibility before Trial.
2. Participating Defense Lawyers and Lower Court Judges.
3. Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults.
4. Police Intervention for taking Protection Measures, Shielding, Attenuation, Metal, Sea Water, etc, -- which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial.

Pattern Example

1. radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;
2. criminal allegations (uttering threats allegation from participants);
3. insinuations that the defendant is dangerous; (demands that the defendant remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation)
4. communications interception and surveillance (justification used, uttering threats s.183);
5. court house participating defense lawyers;
6. non-criminal responsibility before trial; no charter violations presentation at trial and no trial, ignorance used "plead non-criminal responsible before trial, it is the same as not guilty", shorter assault period and lower criminal proceeding costs.
7. police intervention for behavior linked to radiation technology assaults, which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and assessment order;
8. preventing civil lawsuits to recover the loss from false allegations through the continued radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;

 

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Danny Hunt OHCHR Complaint
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-812398

 

Happy Birthday Danny Hunt, July 25, 1968 - (news flash)

Danny claims he was the victim of workplace psychological harassment, a criminal harassment network setup in 2003, false allegations again in 2011, two different types of assassination, one through the influence of the mind (227. criminal code repealed 1999), and this ongoing attempt through repetitive powerful radar/ground penetrating radar assaults linked to leukemia, lung cancer, etc. Quebec Canada, a British Regime. (see Mobbing: Danny Hunt)

 

"Robinson Crusoe" A Canadian Murder Through Cancer Practice - (news flash)

The Canadian Criminal Judicial System, Lower Court Judges, Police, and "Secret Police" are linked to assaulting targeted citizens with radiation technology and powerful radar, which are linked to deadly cancers, lung cancer and leukemia, over long and delayed judicial proceedings. Some lawyers seem to know this practice, aware of it, and call this a "Robinson Crusoe". Why, I don't really understand, something about long proceedings, lawsuits, and cancer. (SHORT ASSASSINATION STRATEGY SUMMARY)

Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults

The Canadian Police, "Secret Police", and mob are linked to a criminal harassment network that uses sound technology like HSS Hypersonic Sound and the LRAD system in public places and from neighboring homes, to sleep deprive targeted victims "if you can't sleep you cannot function". Radiation technology and powerful radar assaults are used in a similar way, in public places, the court house, and from neighboring homes, which makes it impossible to function safely, especially during long and delayed criminal proceedings or the following lawsuits to recover the financial loss from false or malicious allegations.

Short Assassination Strategy Summary

Powerful radar is used to assault citizens in their own homes and in public places in the shin area over a long period of time, long criminal proceedings or civil lawsuits for example, in attempts to damage the bone marrow, which is linked to leukemia. Another area targeted are the lungs, radiation technology is aimed at the lungs to irritate them, to inflame them and to scare them, which can lead to deadly lung cancer. Criminal harassment participants use words like "you have to turn over". Another area targeted, which is also linked to degrading themes, are the testicle, prostate, and colon area.

This method of assassination is different from using polonium radioactive material and leaves less evidence, the radioactive material.

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial

Assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial put defendants on the defensive and prevent claims of these radiation technology assaults. Any claims and protection measures are linked to threats of police intervention, which leads to incarceration at a prison psychiatric institute during the criminal proceedings and can be used to justify non-criminal responsibility, which sanctions the criminal allegations, any charter violations, and circumvents the right to a trial.

 

Human Rights Complaint and Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial Unconstitutional 24(1) and 52(1) - CNN iReport (article link)

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-826168

A human rights complaint from a human rights defender to the OHCHR Petition Team and Special Rapporteurs on the situation of human rights defenders and freedom of expression, and an Application to the Superior Court of Canada to declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial unconstitutional.

Psychological Harassment Information Association
http://www.psychologicalharassment.ca

Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, situation of human rights defenders, Petitions Team
c/o Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
Fax: 41 22 917 9006

6 August 2012

The Human Rights Complaint:

[1] The Petitioner is a human rights defender, the creator and founder of the only English website on psychological harassment, which involves workplace mobbing, bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination;

[2] The Petitioner wrote and published a Mobbing Research article on CNN iReport, and shared it on the Facebook CSPAN discussion area;

[3] Following this publication on February 21, 2011 the Petitioner was arrested and incarcerated. The criminal allegation was “uttering threats towards women” on Facebook;

[4] The article involves mobbing, the use of homelessness as weapon, and people “hitting back” by committing terrible crimes. It involves the possibility that someone else wrote a suicide note to hide the cause of a terrible crime by using a stereotype, an Arab father, which is linked to discrimination. At the time of Marc Lepine’s terrible crime several years ago the media focused on his Arab father while others focused on homelessness;

[5] The criminal proceedings against the Petitioner involves a stereotype and discrimination, mental illness, the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial assessment orders that could make the false allegations valid, circumvent the right to a trial, and circumvent the presentation of charter violation issues at trial such as the freedom of expression, entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computers and information without a warrant, and making this seizure legal;

[6] A previous article was written and published on February 13, 2011 with most of the same information, a list of terrible crimes that have different links to financial loss and homelessness, people “hitting back” by committing terrible crimes. The Marc Lepine massacre crime stands out because it is the only one that the perpetrator wrote a suicide note stating in it that this was not the cause of his terrible crime;

[7] Several charter violations were presented at trial on June 4, 2012 and were all dismissed, which includes the freedom of expression;

[8] The Petitioner was acquitted at trial on June 4, 2012 after long and delayed criminal proceedings that lasted about 16 months, were costly, and created a large financial debt.;

[9] The dismissal of all the charter violation issues presented at trial by the Lower Court Judge may be linked to the civil lawsuit that followed the acquittal to recover the financial loss and damages;

[10] The Petitioner claims that throughout these criminal proceedings he was assaulted by radiation technology and powerful radar in his own home from neighboring homes, in public places, and in the court house too; and that these continue during the civil lawsuit period of time along with mounting pressure to discontinue the civil lawsuit;

[11] The powerful radar type of weapon assaults focused on the shins linked to the shin bone marrow, damaging the bone marrow, and inflicting leukemia; on the lungs area linked to inflaming the lungs, damaging the lungs, scaring the lungs, and inflicting lung cancer; on the testicles linked to damaging the testicles, reducing the production of testosterone, and destroying a man’s fertility;

[12] In this last statement the Petitioner and Human Rights Defender would like to express what he stated to the Lower Court Judge during the criminal proceedings "The defendant stated that those who document workplace psychological harassment and mobbing are targeted by those who use these and have an interest in repressing information and knowledge, these give victims credibility instead of ridicule.";

[13] To the Special Rapporteurs on the freedom of expression, the situation of human rights defenders, and the Petitions Team; the freedom of expression, the situation of human rights defenders, stereotypes and discrimination, the right to a trial, the right to privacy, and the right to security.

Sincerely,
Danny Hunt

__________________________

Danny Hunt
Human Rights Defender
Psychological Harassment Information Association
--
--
Canada --
Tel/fax:

 

Aurora Colo. Massacre, A Blog On The Different Issues - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-818686

Booby Trapped Apartment (Mg update Aug 4), Understanding The Issue, Behavior, Gifted Students, Technology and Cancer, Human Rights and Denial, Abusers Intent and Marie-France Hirigoyen psychiatrist, Circumventing Rights and Freedoms, Stereotypes and Hiding The Cause, Timing, Police Psychiatric Intervention Strategy Patterns, Repression, Human Rights Complaint Admissibility Criteria, Strokes and Heart Attacks, Michael Jackson R.I.P., University Dropout Theory

BOOBY TRAPPED APARTMENT

Aurora Colo. my thoughts on the issue.

When targeted by the mob and through threats, threats of being poisoned, invasion of privacy and trespassing, etc. I believe this can lead to the kind of behavior exhibited by the perpetrator of this crime. Attempts to secure food in locked containers for example and possible violent deterrents like booby traps.

It is similar to the bizarre behavior of victims targeted with powerful radar from neighboring homes, they attempt to avoid these or shield themselves from these with metal etc. -- (update July 29) see the Microwave Radar Technology Research page section Faraday Cage Upgrade, Feb 6, 2012, Granite and Lead Panels videos to see what I mean by strange water containers and wires aka sea water faraday cage to attenuate powerful radar, linked to cancer, and focused ultrasound, linked to sleep deprivation, technologies currently being used by the mob. "The sea water or sea salt water faraday cage is probably the cheapest powerful radar attenuation method that I can think of and also shields from focused ultra sound technology or weapon type.".

Sea Water has a high radar attenuation rating. Sea Water Salt contains Magnesium, Mg2+ 3.7%, an Earth Metal, which makes the water conduct electricity. Earths magnetic field poles may be shifting because of the Mg in the oceans. The idea is that Mg plays a high role in attenuation along with the water. Free Sea Water can be added to free containers as a cheap attenuation solution for anyone targeted from neighboring homes, .. , radiation technology, powerful radar, focused ultrasound aka HSS or LRAD systems technologies, serious illness, lung cancer, leukemia, human rights violations. (Sea Salt, Epsom Salt, Mg). The composition of Sea Water Salt is Cl− 55%, Na+ 30.6%, SO2−4 7.7%, Mg2+ 3.7%, Ca2+ 1.2%, K+ 1.1%. The composition of Magnesium Sulfate (Epsom Salt) MgSO47H2O.

WE DON'T NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE TO PUSH BACK

I disagree, this approach tries to solve a problem without knowing what the problem is. Many of these terrible crimes are linked to bullying and mobbing, repetitive humiliation, eliminating a person's means of subsistence to use homelessness as a weapon, people who believe they are victims of wrong doing and want to "hit back", people who believe that society has failed them and want to "hit back at society", the Rage Shooting Factors in order to prevent them.

I get the impression there are often attempts to hide the cause or that the cause is not considered important, which is published years later like the Columbine massacre for example that was said to be caused by bullying and repetitive humiliation, and simply advocating gun control.

BEHAVIOR

Some clues linked to victims of technology assaults aka radiation technology, powerful radar, and focused ultrasound.

They will attempt to avoid these or shield themselves from these, which means they will try to sleep in the park, an alley, metro, under a bridge, a hotel, etc, even when they have an apartment or home available to them, which is linked to homelessness.

They will try to shield themselves from these, which means radar shielding materials, metal, water, water containers, sea water, dielectrics, and the current thought is that if they conduct or grounded they can absorb more of the energy, a faraday cage, which means grounded with wires or aluminum paper. Grounded directly in the ground or in an electrical socket. Water containers work best for focused ultrasound and free. -- The focused ultrasound aka HSS Hypersonic Sound and LRAD type of technology can be linked to sleep deprivation, which is linked to the behavior of attempting to sleep some where else but can also be linked to music, a type of "sleeping machine", and even loud techno music.

GIFTED STUDENTS

The perpetrators of the Columbine massacre were said to be gifted students who were victims of bullying and repetitive humiliation, which led to them "hitting back" through the use of guns and a massacre. The Oklahoma bombing that brought down a building using a bomb made with fertilizer was rumored to be "hitting back" at the FBI for the Waco compound burning that killed women and children. What is the potential of a neuroscience PH.D candidate, "hitting back" by creating a neurotoxin that kills everyone in his town? This is why I believe that understanding the cause, the Rage Shooting Factors, is important.

I believe in the U.S. Founding Fathers wisdom that a well armed population is its best defense and deterrent to dictatorships, abuse by authorities, these fear a population that can rise up and remove them, and I believe that a defenseless population leads or encourages more abuse.

RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, POWERFUL RADAR, AND FOCUSED ULTRASOUND

The mob and organized crime are using technology to target citizens and this is only a short summery of some of their use.

DAMAGE:
TESTICLES; this organized crime network tries to damage the testicles, which are linked to a man's health, testosterone production, muscle loss, degrading themes, "turning men into women", "the police want your balls", "you have to turn over".
THROAT AND LYMPH-NODES; radiation technology is aimed at the throat and lymph-node area, which burns and inflames the throat linked to throat cancer, and burns the throat lymph-nodes, damaging them.
LUNGS; the radiation technology and powerful radar are aimed at the lungs area, which inflames and scares them, which are linked to deadly lung cancer.
SHINS; powerful radar is aimed at the shin area, the shin bone, which is linked to damaging the bone marrow and leukemia.
BLOOD; powerful radar is linked to shifting blood counts and leukemia.
SLEEP DEPRIVATION; sleep deprivation is linked to or used for premature aging, drastically increases the risk of cancer, over sixty percent increase, and stress is linked to most illnesses, over eighty percent.
GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; from neighboring homes.
HUMAN RIGHTS; we hear of different human rights violations and more visible violence by the "secret police" of other regimes like Egypt and Syria, this technology and type of violence linked to serious illness, leukemia and cancer, are linked to the British Regimes such as Canada, Great Britain, and Australia. They ridicule victims and deny their claims.

MARIE-FRANCE HIRIGOYEN PSYCHIATRIST

According to Marie-France Hirigoyen the intent of many emotional abusers is to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity, and often emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger aka "hitting back", only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves, which could be linked to or the cause of rage shooting and rampages.

- Often, emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger, only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves.
- This, according to Hirigoyen, is the intent of many abusers: to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity.

- psychiatrist Marie-France Hirigoyen, author of Le harcèlement moral

CIRCUMVENTING RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Seventeen Strategies to Circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-733909

THE FIFTH STRATEGY -- THE HOMELESSNESS WEAPON

Citizens are presented with the believe that they have rights and civil liberties, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but they are circumvented through the use of homelessness, the homelessness weapon. -- The Police, Criminal Judicial System, and Mob are linked to eliminating a citizens means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations or during long delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to make a conviction or smear campaign easier, mobbing.

THE FIFTEENTH STRATEGY -- RAGE SHOOTINGS

This one is very controversial, it involves the right to bear arms and the idea that a well armed population is its best defense against dictatorship. Here is an example of how this right can be circumvented to lead to different forms of dictatorships through organized crime.

Organized crime uses workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment to use homelessness as a weapon and to circumvent the rights of citizens, which is linked to rage shootings and an interest in abusing citizens to cause rage shootings, which leads to advocating gun control and an unarmed or defenseless population. -- Dictatorships have news and "freedom of the press" too, this is not the deterrent and protection from dictatorships, a well armed population that can rise up and overthrow any dictatorship or abusive authorities is. Dictators and abusive authorities know and fear this, which would be linked to the incentive of wanting a defenseless population.

STEREOTYPE, HIDING THE CAUSE

Did Someone Else Write Marc Lepine's Suicide Note and Use a Stereotype, An Arab Father? - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-817405

"The Marc Lepine crime at the Montreal Polytech was a terrible one that involved many victims similar to the mass shooting of Cho a Virginia Tech. In Cho's case similar to the Columbine massacre the cause may have been bullying or repetitive humiliation. With Marc Lepine, the mob targets and eliminates the means of subsistence of those targeted to use homelessness as a weapon, to circumvent the rights and freedoms that we have. If this is the case and a suicide note was written to hide the cause, it would be to advocate gun control and circumvent another right that the population has, the right to bear arms."

The stereotype issue, did Mark Lepine commit this terrible crime to "hit back at society" and a suicide note written to hide the cause, mobbing, the mob using homelessness as a weapon, by using a stereotype based on an Arab father.

Mobbing Research : Marc Lepine and Rage shooting and Rampages [facebook]
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-559620

"Dear Police,
I write this suicide note so that you won't have too, I just want everyone to know that If I commit suicide today or go on a rampage it's not because my means of subsistence have been eliminated and drained by the mob who try to pass themselves off as our society, .... it's because I hate women now .." - A Parody of Suicide Note

"What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause."

"Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons." - Mark Lepine Suicide Note

Following the publication of this article the writer was arrested and charged with uttering threats towards women, which was combined with powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes and public places linked to deadly cancers, leukemia and lung cancer, that made the ability to function during the criminal allegation proceedings period almost impossible, created a large financial debt., and continue during attempts to recover this loss through a lawsuit.

Hitting Back:
- A man blows up the Oklahoma FBI building, said to be hitting back for the Waco Texas incident;
- A man fly's a plane into a government building, said to be hitting back for unfair treatment by IRS;
- A man shoots 4 RCMP members, linked to bankruptcy and repossession;
- A homeless person snowplows a member of the Police force, linked to homelessness;
- A man shoots a member of government, ..
- A man shoots 9 people at his workplace after being fired;
- A man shoots several women at a Montreal University; claims in a suicide letter that it is not because he has no more finances;
- The Columbine Massacre, said to be victims of bullying and repetitive humiliation;

TIMING

Strangely, the above article was published shortly before the Aurora Colo. massacre, which led the writer to write the following ""The Aurora Colo. massacre happened shortly after the publication of this article. I was the victim of intense powerful radar assaults last night, communicated this to human rights organizations, and discovered another terrible massacre had occurred similar to the one in this article. I do not know if this intense assault was some kind of retaliation to this massacre or if this massacre its self is some kind of retaliation or deterrent to this article." *Update, suspect was a PH.D candidate and in the process of withdrawing from University*"
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-817405 (unavailable/censored)

POLICE PSYCHIATRIC INTERVENTION STRATEGY PATTERNS AND ILLUSTRATIONS

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial, Links to Smear Campaigns - CNN iReport
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-808083

I do not know of any other strategy to circumvent charter violations and the right to a fair trial.

1. Non-Criminal Responsibility before Trial.
2. Participating Defense Lawyers and Lower Court Judges.
3. Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults.
4. Police Intervention for taking Protection Measures, Shielding, Attenuation, Metal, Sea Water, etc, -- which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial.

Pattern Example

1. radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;
2. criminal allegations (uttering threats allegation from participants);
3. insinuations that the defendant is dangerous; (demands that the defendant remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation)
4. communications interception and surveillance (justification used, uttering threats s.183);
5. court house participating defense lawyers;
6. non-criminal responsibility before trial; no charter violations presentation at trial and no trial, ignorance used "plead non-criminal responsible before trial, it is the same as not guilty", shorter assault period and lower criminal proceeding costs.
7. police intervention for behavior linked to radiation technology assaults, which leads to incarceration during the criminal proceedings and assessment order;
8. preventing civil lawsuits to recover the loss from false allegations through the continued radiation technology and powerful radar assaults;

REPRESSION

Repression involves eliminating and exhausting the resources of targeted citizen, assaults with radiation technology and powerful radar linked to deadly cancers, attempts to prevent addressing human rights violations, delays, organized crime etc. These may be linked to "hitting back at society" and violence.

"I wrote a Mobbing Research article on Feb 21, 2011, and published it on CNN iReport. I was arrested with allegations that I "uttered threats towards women" when I shared it on facebook even though freedom of expression is supposed to protect me from this. This is part of what is involved in this article "The Marc Lepine crime at the Montreal Polytech was a terrible one that involved many victims similar to the mass shooting of Cho a Virginia Tech. In Cho's case similar to the Columbine massacre the cause may have been bullying or repetitive humiliation. With Marc Lepine, the mob targets and eliminates the means of subsistence of those targeted to use homelessness as a weapon, to circumvent the rights and freedoms that we have. If this is the case and a suicide note was written to hide the cause, it would be to advocate gun control and circumvent another right that the population has, the right to bear arms.". It involves the possibility that a stereotype was used to hide the cause of this terrible crime, an Arab father, which was followed by attempts to use another stereotype following the arrest, mental illness, by using demands that I remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation and non-criminal responsibility before trial. This would make the allegations valid and circumvents the right to a trial and charter violations presentation such as freedom of expression, entering a home without a warrant, seizing private computers without a warrant, and making this seizure legal. I do not have a license for guns and do not own guns but throughout these criminal proceedings that lasted more than a year I was threatened and attacked through organized crime. Organized crime is now using radiation technology and powerful radar assaults to attack citizens in their own homes to make functioning during this period of time impossible, and use HSS Hypersonic Sound or LRAD type of technology to sleep deprive the defendants, reducing a person's ability to function or preventing a person from functioning, especially before important court appearances."

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT ADMISSIBILITY CRITERIA - OHCHR +

"The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted," -- Ironically, the Police, "Secret Police", the mob that protects and "cleans" the Police are aware of this, use delays, attempt to eliminate the means of subsistence of targeted citizens, and exhaust their resources to use homelessness as a weapon to prevent complaints and the exposure of wrong doing.

In some regimes like the Canadian British regime the mob is also using radiation technology and powerful radar assaults in public places, the court house, and from neighboring homes to target citizens in their own homes to make it impossible for them to function. Another technology used in combination to mobbing, criminal harassment, to make it hard or impossible to function is the use of HSS Hypersonic Sound or LRAD type of technology from neighboring homes for high levels of sleep deprivation.

aka

During attempts to exhaust all domestic resources citizens are targeted through organized crime to exhaust their resources, and even inflict serious illness linked to high levels of sleep deprivation, radiation technology and powerful radar assaults, deadly lung cancer and leukemia etc.

Long Term Homicide Strategy

The long term repressive homicide strategy by these is to repetitively assault targeted citizens with powerful radar in their own homes, public places, and court house too in the shin bone area in attempts to damage the bone marrow and inflict leukemia, and to repetitively assault the lungs area in attempts to inflame, damage, and scare the lungs to inflict lung cancer.

STROKES AND HEART ATTACKS

If you thought that being repetitively assaulted with powerful radar technology in the shin bone bone marrow area in attempts to inflict leukemia and the lung area in attempts to inflict lung cancer was bad, the mob and "secret police" in some regimes are also using focused ultrasound technologies to inflict strokes and heart attacks. It is a weapon that leaves no evidence of wrong doing except suspicion. They may also be targeting related children to "hit back" at high ranking members of society in the government and police forces, and not simply older adults, children that die suddenly from a stroke. The use of cancer and leukemia to murder targeted citizen, government critics, civil rights advocates, and human rights defenders for example on a longer term without attracting attention, "natural causes", similar to strokes and heart attacks through focused ultrasound, may also be linked to an interest in repressing cures for cancer and leukemia.

MICHAEL JACKSON

Michael Jackson was probably the victim of blackmail and a smear campaign, apparently some of the people involved have admitted that this was the case. False allegations of pedophilia can be referred to as the pedophilia weapon, a weapon that induces fear because of the instant hate false allegations create towards those targeted by these, and a label that sticks even when acquitted. It is a type of mob weapon used for blackmail, in smear campaigns, to induce fear, and even to bring down popular and powerful stars like Michael Jackson. The possible motives may have been that Michael was a powerful environmentalist, the Earth song, which even depicts drought like the one currently inflicting the United States that may have worried the oil industry or simply the mob wanting to control a popular and powerful star.

The issue and point that I want to illustrate linked to the mentioned technologies is that it is possible that following this smear campaign Michael may have been the victim of these technologies, HSS Hypersonic Sound and LRAD type of technologies used for high levels of sleep deprivation, which led to his overdose on powerful drugs.

R.I.P. Michael

UNIVERSITY DROPOUT THEORY

One of the reasons the mob is using focused ultrasound is to sleep deprive the targeted citizen, which reduces their ability to function or eliminates their ability to function, which leads to poor performance, lower grades, dropping out of school, the lose of employment, and homelessness. This theory would be linked to the resulting poor performance, lower grades, and dropping out of University.

The other technology currently being used by the mob, radiation technology and powerful radar from neighboring homes has a similar goal, to make it impossible for defendants to function during criminal proceedings, shielding measures lead to police intervention and incarceration during the proceedings. -- Victims are told by the mobbing participants that they have to "run" "run away or get cancer", which leads to incarceration when they are finally recaptured, looking guilty instead of innocent, and pressure to accept non-criminal responsibility before trial, which circumvents the right to a trial and charter violations, etc.. The other goals are darker, to push targeted citizens to homelessness and to inflict deadly cancers, leukemia, lung cancer, etc, and what some in the legal profession refer to as a "Robinson Crusoe" where the victims of these die of cancer during long and delayed judicial proceedings.

 

CANADA
PROVINCE DE --
DISTRICT DE --
Numéro du greffe : --

No. DE DOSSIER: --
No. DE DOSSIER: --
No. D'EVENEMENT: --

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(CIVIL COURT)
______________________________________
DANNY HUNT;

APPELLANT - PETITIONER - DEMANDER

v.

--;

RESPONDENT - DEFENDER
______________________________________

APPLICATION TO DECLARE THE USE OF ASSESSMENT ORDERS FOR NON-CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BEFORE TRIAL TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACCORDING TO ARTICLES 24(1) AND 52(1) OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL ACT, THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

TO ONE OF THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, CIVIL COURT, IN THE DISTRICT OF --, THE APPLICANT PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING:
INTRODUCTION

[1] An Application for an order allowing the application, granting the application, a declaration that non-criminal responsibility before trial can circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation presentation, and that because of this it can be abused for these reasons and motives, to declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial instead of at the end of trial as indicated in the Canadian Supreme Court Judgment R v. Swain in any case to be unconstitutional, and grant the Application to declare the use of assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial to be unconstitutional under articles 24(1) and 52(1) of the Constitutional Act, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

THE GROUNDS FOR THIS APPLICATION ARE:

[2] THAT an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility must be made at the end of trial as to not interfere with the defendant’s defense according to the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Swain;

[3] THAT according the Supreme Court of Canada Judge in R v. Swain <<I believe, moreover, that conferring on the prosecution a conditional right to raise the issue of insanity during the course of the trial infringes upon the equality rights of the mentally disabled under s. 15 of the Charter. It denies the mentally disabled, a group in our society which has been negatively stereotyped and historically disadvantaged, the control over their defences reposed in other accused persons and does so in a way which is discriminatory. In denying the mentally disabled personal autonomy in decision‑making it reinforces the stereotype that they are incapable of rational thought and the ability to look after their own interests. In a word, it denies them equality with other accused persons under the guise, putting it at its best, of a benign paternalism. -- It seems to me that the principle advanced in support of the prosecution's right to introduce evidence of insanity can be effectively implemented by having the issue of the accused's insanity raised at the conclusion of the trial in cases where the defences put forward by the accused have been rejected and the essential elements of the offence have been established by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt. At that point I think either party should be free to raise the issue of the accused's insanity. I realize, of course, that there is an element of circularity involved in this approach in that insanity has a direct bearing on proof of mens rea. However, I prefer this approach since it both respects the accused's right to waive the defence of insanity and ensures that any resultant prejudice he suffers in the finding of guilt flows from his own decision not to avail himself of the defence and not as a consequence of the prosecution's having raised the issue in the middle of the trial process.”>>;

[4] THAT the -- Police made a demand on February 23, 2011that the defendant remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation;

[5] THAT following the -- Police demand the Crown made a demand on February 23, 2011 for an assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility, which would circumvent the right to a trial if successful;

[6] THAT the February 23, 2011 assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility if successful would circumvent the presentation of several charter violation issues at trial such as the freedom of expression, entering and searching a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing private computers and information without a warrant, and make this seizure of private computers and information legal;

[7] THAT the Crown on February 23, 2011 did not provide any evidence to support his demand for the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial by way of affidavit or oral testimony;

[8] THAT according to the criminal code and the Supreme Court of British Columbia Honourable Justice Pitfield in R v. Muschke, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony must be presented by the Crown to make a demand for non-criminal responsibility 672.12(3)(b); <<[31] .. recital of what were referred to by the Crown as facts was insufficient for purposes of ss. 672.11 and 672.12, affidavit or viva voce evidence was required,-- [40] In the ordinary course, evidence on an application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony. -- [47] .. In the case of R. v. Dobrotic, [1995] N.B.J. No. 222 (Q.L.), the New Brunswick Court of Appeal concluded that even with the consent of the accused to assessment, an order should not be made unless there was sufficient evidence before the judge to provide reasonable grounds to doubt the accused's criminal responsibility. -- [48] Even if they could have been relied upon to establish reasonable grounds for belief, the recitation of facts by counsel disclosed unusual and quite possibly unacceptable conduct on the part of the applicant but did not provide reasonable and probable grounds for believing that the accused was incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of his acts in the form of the alleged threats or of knowing that his acts were wrong. -- [51] .. the application was made by the prosecutor pursuant to s. 672.12(3)(b) of the Code. Had fitness been an issue, there was nothing before the judge, whether by statements from counsel or otherwise, which would have justified the formulation of a belief based on reasonable grounds that the applicant, on account of mental disorder, was unable to understand the nature or object of the proceedings in which he was involved, understand the possible consequences of the proceedings, or communicate with counsel. One or more of these factors are necessary in order to formulate an opinion that one is unfit to stand trial as the phrase is defined in s. 2 of the Code. -- [52] It follows that because the initial order was unlawful, the extension was equally invalid. .. -- 672.12 (3)(b); (3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if; (b) the prosecutor satisfies the court that there are reasonable grounds to doubt that the accused is criminally responsible for the alleged offence, on account of mental disorder.>>;

[9] THAT the defendant/applicant was contesting the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial of February 23, 2011on June 13, 2011 when it was corrected or renewed;

[10] THAT the assessment order of February 23, 2011 did not contain the correct hospital information, it indicated Albert Prevost instead of CPLM, and was therefore made Out of Jurisdiction according to R v. Creighton, and was corrected or renewed to CPLM on June 13, 2011;

[11] THAT the Crown declared the assessment order expired at the Court of Appeals on October 14, 2011, an Appeal concerning the Crown making the demand before trial R v. Swain and without providing any evidence R v. Muschke, R v. Dobrotic;

[12] THAT the Appeal R v. Creighton of October 21, 2011 that was combined with a motion for Abuse of Process “ceased to exist” according to Superior Court Judge -- , resulting in the Abuse of Process motion being made Out of Jurisdiction at the Superior Court without the Appeal R v. Creighton;

[13] THAT the Crown stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial on October 21, 2011;

[14] THAT the Crown on November 9, 2011 stated that he wished to renew his demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial but required the testimony of a psychiatrist as indicated in R v. Muschke “application before a court is provided by way of affidavit and, occasionally, by oral testimony” <<Me -- : Bien, la problematigue c’est que je dois… -- … je dois communiquer avec son psychiatre parce que monsieur etait… il avait eu une… il y avait eu une ordonnance, la… -- … pour que monsieur soit… se fasse evaluer. -- Et le delai de soixante (60) jours etait termine pour cette ordonnance-la et l’evaluation est pas terminee. -- Et monsieur conteste cette ordonnance-la, donc je sais que je devrai assigner la psychiatre pour qu’elle vienne temoigner sur l’etat de monsieur afin de demontrer au Tribunal qu’il y a des motifs, la, pour soupeser cette demande d’ordonnance la. – Sauf que j’ai pas encore communique avec le psychiatre parce que c’est pas necessairement facile. – Et j’esperais, la, que le dix-huit (18) novembre j’aurais les dates de disponibilite de la psychiatre pour qu’on puisse fixer une audition.>>;

[15] THAT on November 9, 2011 the Lower Court Judge instituted proceedings and ordered a trial over the objections of the defendant/applicant for April 13, 2012;

[16] THAT non-criminal responsibility before trial can circumventing the right to a trial and charter violation issues presented at trial;

[17] THAT the abuse and the incentive to abuse the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial can be linked to these reasons and motives;

[18] THAT for these reasons that the Honourable Superior Court Judge declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial in any case to be unconstitutional;

[19] Such further and other grounds as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT RELIES UPON THE FOLLOWING:

[20] The -- Police demand for incarceration and psychological evaluation;
[21] The assessment order of February 23, 2011 and June 13, 2011;
[22] The transcript of February 23, 2011, June 13, 2011, October 21, 2011, November 21, 2011;
[23] Judgments R v Swain, R v Muschke, R v Creighton;
[24] The thick booklet with charter violation issues;
[25] Human Rights Complaint booklet;
[26] Affidavit and Factum; and
[27] Such further and other material as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.

THE ORDER SOUGHT IS:

[28] An Order allowing the application, granting the application, a declaration that non-criminal responsibility before trial can circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation presentation, and that because of this it can be abused for these reasons and motives, to declare the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial instead of at the end of trial as indicated in the Canadian Supreme Court Judgment R v. Swain in any case to be unconstitutional, and grant the Application to declare the use of assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial to be unconstitutional under articles 24(1) and 52(1) of the Constitutional Act, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

FOR THESE MOTIVES, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT:
RECEIVE the APPLICATION;
DECLARE that assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation issues presented at trial to be unconstitutional;
GRANT the Application and Declaration;
RENDER judgment in accordance to the demands of justice;
THE WHOLE without costs.
AND I SIGNED IN -- -- CANADA
The 7 August 2012
---------------------------------------------------------
Danny Hunt
Applicant - Petitioner - Demander

 

The Canadian Equivalent to Bangladesh Acid Violence, Premature Aging and Inflicting Serious Illness - CNN iReport (article link)

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-830078

An article that discusses the destruction of a women's and a man's beauty, fertility, health, an asset, in Bangladesh and Canada. In Bangladesh acid violence is used to disfigure women to destroy the asset. In Canada technology is used for repression to inflict premature aging and cancer to destroy the asset.

In Bangladesh women and the beauty of a women is an asset and the destruction of that beauty destroys the asset. "The patriarchal mindset is the reason for acid violence, especially the beauty aspect. If I take this beauty away from a girl, then no one will marry her. So if this girl is not mine, she will not be anyone else's. For land dispute, also, they want to destroy the asset of the family and therefore they destroy the beauty of the girl." "Ownership, property, possession" of women is linked to discrimination.

In Canada the Police and Secret Police are linked to a criminal harassment network, criminal harassment participants in public places. These use threats and provocation to induce cortisol and adrenaline, stress, combined with high levels of sleep deprivation through focused ultrasound technology, HSS Hypersonic Sound and LRAD systems, for several years. The adrenaline and sleep deprivation are a form of medical weapon and used to deplete macro-minerals, calcium. The high levels of sleep deprivation increase the risk of cancer and are linked to premature aging. When a person cannot sleep they cannot function and eventually lose their means of subsistence.

During Police criminal allegations, the long and delayed judicial proceedings, this criminal harassment network uses powerful radar assault type of weapons to assault the targeted citizen in their own homes, public places, and in the court house too. This is combined with non-criminal responsibility before trial that circumvents the right to a trial and charter violation issues presented at trial, which is linked to discrimination.

"The Petitioner claims that throughout these criminal proceedings he was assaulted by radiation technology and powerful radar in his own home from neighboring homes, in public places, and in the court house too; and that these continue during the civil lawsuit period of time along with mounting pressure to discontinue the civil lawsuit; -- The powerful radar type of weapon assaults focused on the shins linked to the shin bone marrow, damaging the bone marrow, and inflicting leukemia; on the lungs area linked to inflaming the lungs, damaging the lungs, scaring the lungs, and inflicting lung cancer; on the testicles linked to damaging the testicles, reducing the production of testosterone, and destroying a man’s fertility; -- In this last statement the Petitioner and Human Rights Defender would like to express what he stated to the Lower Court Judge during the criminal proceedings "The defendant stated that those who document workplace psychological harassment and mobbing are targeted by those who use these and have an interest in repressing information and knowledge, these give victims credibility instead of ridicule.";" (see the court and human rights complaint on the Danny Hunt (mobbing) page)

Mobbing:

The use of radiation technology and powerful radar to assault citizens with a cancer causing weapon, lung cancer and leukemia for example, in their own homes, public places, and court houses too, to discourage a proper defense when faced with false allegations, and the lawsuits that follow these. The use of these technologies are linked to repression, organized crime, homelessness, smear campaigns, inflicting a large financial loss or bankrupting citizens through false allegations, the use of non-criminal responsibility before trial to circumvent the right to a trial and charter violation issues, and inflicting deadly forms of cancer on a longer term, which are homicides through cancer.

Focused ultrasound, the award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound technology and LRAD type of systems that use focused ultrasound to create sound at great distances are another technology reported being used by the mob to target citizens in their own homes during criminal judicial proceedings, to highly sleep deprive targeted citizens, especially before important court appearances. High levels of sleep deprivation drastically increases the risk of cancers. The focused ultrasound technology is linked to other uses such as inflicting dizziness and physical damage, brain lesions, heart attacks and strokes, hidden homicides. The point for this post, the water in the containers with the sea salt or shredded leaves also shields and protects the targeted citizen from focused ultrasound technologies.

Magnesium (Mg) and the Industry

The powerful radar assaults are used to overwhelm the finances of the citizen who is already faced with the high cost of legal representation and legal fees such as transcripts to appeal "unlawful" lower court orders, which increase the cost of the proceedings and their length. These citizens are mislead as to what can protect them from these assaults, powerful radar, and information on the issue is not available. One example as to how Mobbing participants mislead victims is by telling them to "buy copper" "it conducts". If you are assaulted in public places and in court it isn't easy to walk around with a suit of armor, iron, or lead, which is toxic. It is actually Magnesium, a light metal.

 

MEDICAL WEAPONS

Human Rights, Four Medical Weapons Used By The Canadian Mob - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-730373

An article about four medical weapons, Acid-Base Imbalance, PTSD, HSS Hypersonic Sound, Radar.

First Medical Weapon

Acid-Base Imbalance a Medical Weapon Linked to Diet, Stress, and Sleep Deprivation - CNN iReport (article link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-681985
http://www.psychologicalharassment.us/news/mobbing-in-modern-society/1170-acid-base-imbalance-a-medical-weapon-linked-to-diet-stress-and-sleep-deprivation-cnn-ireport-article-link

In 2008 I was highly sleep deprived through sound technology and highly stressed through criminal harassment, provocation linked to adrenaline and the loss of potassium, depletion of calcium, which is linked to the buffer system and acid-base imbalance.

Several doctors including a cardiologist told me that high levels of stress and sleep deprivation had no effect on the body and heart.

High levels of sleep deprivation, stress, and acid-base imbalance was the medical and physical weapons the mob was using to cause physical damage, premature aging, calcium depletion, and links to serious illness.

The Standard American Diet, S.A.D., a diet high in sugar, refined, and processed foods makes people more vulnerable to this weapon.

Second Medical Weapon

Criminal Harassment Network Linked to PTSD - CNN iReport (article link)

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER (PTSD)

An article about a criminal harassment network intentionally inflicting PTSD "making a person yellow".

Summary

[[7] A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived, criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor and attempts at repetitive humiliation;]

Eliminating a person's means of subsistence can consist of workplace psychological harassment followed by criminal harassment to reduce a victims credibility, the homelessness weapon.

The criminal harassment can consist of provocation and threats, "you are going to starve" "you'll eat garbage" "you are a leech" to induce stress, adrenaline, and fear.

Provocation and threats lead to cortisol and adrenaline, difficulty breathing or stress related breathing, someone that has participated in threats and provocation standing behind you and out of view can induce fear and insecurity leading to voice fluctuations.

These voice fluctuations are interpreted as fear by criminal harassment participants, an attack to the victims honor and repetitive humiliation.

Bullying and repetitive humiliation are linked to mass and rage shootings, and rampages.

PTSD

The routine example is also linked to PTSD or what the criminal harassment network participants called "making a person yellow" "we are going to make you yellow".

High levels of stress, sleep deprivation, cortisol, being on guard for voice fluctuations that can be linked to insecurity, fear, or interpreted as these by participants that leads to humiliation, the fear of humiliation, fear, over a long period of time.

PTSD in soldiers is linked to high levels of stress, sleep deprivation, being on guard over long periods of time, combat, fear, and events with a high level of fear.

Third Medical Weapon (sleep deprivation)

HSS Hypersonic Sound - Wikipedia (article link)

Elwood "Woody" Norris, founder and Chairman of American Technology Corporation (ATC), announced he had successfully created a device which achieved ultrasound transmission of sound in 1996.[5] ATC named and trademarked their device as "HyperSonic Sound" (HSS). In February 1998, HSS was named the Best of What's New for 1997 by readers of Popular Science [6]. In December 2002, Popular Science named HyperSonic Sound the best invention of 2002.[citation needed] Norris received the 2005 Lemelson-MIT Prize for his invention of a "hypersonic sound".[7] ATC (now named LRAD Corporation) spun off the technology to Parametric Sound Corporation in September 2010 to focus on their Long Range Acoustic Device products (LRAD), according to their quarterly reports, press releases and executive statements.[8][9]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound

The HSS technology uses ultrasound distribution, so the audio can be broadcast in narrow beam similar to laser. HSS allows highly focused sound beam, therefor significantly minimizing the noise level in closed or opened area.

directional-sound.com/en/products/hyper-sonic-sound

Possible organized crime applications: sleep deprivation, criminal harassment, threats and intimidation, ideation and psychological manipulation, suicides.

Fourth Medical Weapon (cancer)

Epidemiologic evidence relevant to radar (microwave) effects

"Four types of effects were originally reported in multiple studies: increased spontaneous abortion, shifts in red and white blood cell counts, increased somatic mutation rates in lymphocytes, and increased childhood, testicular, and other cancers."

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1469943/

[7] Abstract

Public and occupational exposures to microwave (RF) are of two main types. The first type of exposures are those connected with military and industrial uses and, to some extent broadcast exposures. It is this type that most of the data cited in this study draw upon. The second type, cellular telephones and their associated broadcast requirements, have raised concerns about current exposures because of their increasingly widespread use. Four types of effects were originally reported in multiple studies: increased spontaneous abortion, shifts in red and white blood cell counts, increased somatic mutation rates in lymphocytes, and increased childhood, testicular, and other cancers. In addition, there is evidence of generalized increased disability rates from a variety of causes in one study and symptoms of sensitivity reactions and lenticular opacity in at least one other. These findings suggest that RF exposures are potentially carcinogenic and have other health effects. Therefore, prudent avoidance of unneeded exposures is recommended as a precautionary measure. Epidemiologic studies of occupational groups such as military users and air traffic controllers should have high priority because their exposures can be reasonably well characterized and the effects reported are suitable for epidemiologic monitoring. Additional community studies are needed.

 

OTHER WORKS IN PROGRESS

Dear International Community, Human Rights Violations
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-711891

[7] A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived, criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor and attempts at repetitive humiliation;

Dear OHCHR

I would like to make you and human right defenders aware of my mobbing experience --.

[1] In 2003-2004 I reported the belief that I had caused the death of a team mate, -- , when a minor to the -- after being led to this conclusion by criminal harassment participants or mobbing participants;

[2] Their intention, mobbing participants, seemed to be a run away strategy linked to insinuations that I had committed murder and "who told you" linked to the psychological threat of being framed;

[3] I was charged with criminal mischief when she was found alive but her brother ceased to exist, resulting in my reporting of this error to the -- and the charge of criminal mischief in 2004;

[4] It seems to have been a mobbing and organized crime trap which would resulting in a criminal record, I found myself having to prove that I had caused the death of -- to be found innocent of criminal mischief;

[5] Starting in 2007 I began to experience high levels of sleep deprivation through what I believe to be sound technology, possibly the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound technology that is linked to using ultra sound to create sound at a great distances and specific locations;

[6] Combined with criminal harassment and mobbing linked to provocation and threats to induce adrenaline and high levels of stress, acid-base disorders, and premature aging;

[7] A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived, criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor and attempts at repetitive humiliation;

[8] In 2008 I filed complaints against several medical professionals including a cardiologist that told me high levels of stress and sleep deprivation had no effect on the body, muscles, and heart;

[9] In 2008-2009 I filed complaints with the -- against -- a former -- member who was present in the event when a minor;

[10] Following this complaint with the -- I filed a complaint with the -- Police dept. against -- the former -- member with the -- police dept. and requested a search for -- who according to the -- ceased to exist in 2004;

[11] In August-September 2010 I started being attacked through powerful radar microwaves at my apartment, used to push me out of my apartment during winter, and linked to another run away strategy "run away or get cancer" and the criminal allegations of February 21 fabricated from to a Mobbing Research article by the Laval Police dept.;

[12] I continue to be attacked through powerful radar and microwave technology during the period of time I attempt to defend myself (see motions below) resulting in making me vulnerable to threats of intervention for the behavior linked to attempts to protect myself from this technology or weapon linked to cancer, which is linked to being detained and vulnerable to bad legal representation or participants in mobbing to frame a targeted citizen;

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-659420

Mobbing Research: Run Away Strategy "run away or get cancer" - CNN iReport
(article link)

[1] The mob, organized crime, is using powerful radar and microwave technology linked to radiation sensitive cancer such as lung cancer combined with the criminal allegations, a run away strategy "run away or get cancer";

[2] Victims of this strategy who run away are framed through being detained and incarcerated resulting in being vulnerable to bad legal representation or participating lawyers at great expense.

http://www.psychologicalharassment.info/news/mobbing-in-modern-society/1141-mobbing-research-run-away-strategy-qrun-away-or-get-cancerq

 

Articles linked to Human Rights and Criminal Allegations combined with Radar Assaults "you have to run".

Human Rights, Canadian Mob Strategy, Cancer, Hidden Homicides Through Medical System
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-718907

Canadian Mob Strategy

Criminal allegations are combined with radar assaults in Canada along with insinuations the accused is dangerous.

1. criminal allegations
2. radar assaults
3. insinuations that accused is dangerous

Violent and Aggressive Behavior

The criminal allegations trap the accused while the accused is assaulted with powerful radar, any violent reactions or behavior by the accused resulting from the radar assaults help fit the allegations and frame the accused.

Radar Related Cancers

The powerful radar assaults that the accused is exposed to over several months during the proceedings and increased through wrongful orders and delays to increase the length of the criminal proceedings are linked to deadly cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, and bone cancer.

Run Away Strategy

The radar assaults combined with criminal allegations are linked to a run away strategy.

"you have to run" - criminal harassment participants.

Increased Expenses

The powerful radar assaults combined with criminal allegations are used to help overwhelm and deplete the finances of a targeted citizen or bankrupt them as they try to pay for both expensive legal representation, try to avoid the radar assaults, and expensive metal radar shielding materials;

If the accused attempts to run away, they become a fugitive, another mob strategy.

Assessment Orders Before Trial

Assessment orders made before trial are also linked to this strategy where an accused can be found non-criminally responsible of having committed a crime, when they have not committed a crime, linked to a smear campaign, before the accused even has a trial to go through the facts, "radar assaults, you must be delusional", which "fixes" any police wrong doing such as searching a home without warrant, seizing computers without a warrant, and communications interception based on false allegations.

The Threat of Intervention

With an assessment order made before trial the accused is vulnerable to intervention and being framed as mentioned above, through non-criminal responsibility of having committed a crime when they have not committed a crime, but also become vulnerable when detained to increased expenses for participating defense lawyers and a corrupt or participating criminal judicial system.

Participating Defense Lawyers and Corrupt Judicial System

Participating defense lawyers and a participating or corrupt criminal judicial system increase the delays and the legal costs through wrongful or unlawful Orders and judgements that need to be Appealed, expensive transcripts for the Appeals, legal representation, and other related costs.

Preventing Lawsuits

The upside of radar assaults combined with criminal allegations is that no one wants sue.

False allegations, Police legal wrong doing such as entering and search a home without warrant, seizing computers and private information without warrant, a corrupt judicial system that uses unlawful orders to increase delays and expenses, malicious prosecutions, the combination of radar assaults during these long proceedings and their intentional delays discourage legal recourse through lawsuits.

Cancer and Medical System

Any resulting cancer increases expenses and creates a vulnerability to the medical system that can be used for coercion and people that can be intimidated into participating by the Canadian mob.

Cancer and hidden homicides through the medical system.

 

Acid-Base Imbalance, Powerful Radar, Bone Cancer
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-724325

Journal Entry Dec 31, 2011; Powerful Radar and Bone Cancer

Acid-Base Imbalance

I've been the victim of a criminal harassment network for over ten years, they led me to believe that I had caused the death of -- , the sister of -- , reported it in 2003, and I was charged with criminal mischief by the -- Police.

In 2007 this criminal harassment network was combined with high levels of sleep deprivation through sound technology, high levels of sleep deprivation combined with criminal harassment participants who use threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline.

It is linked to an acid-base imbalance strategy or medical knowledge weapon that is linked to premature aging, heart disease, calcium depletion, and bone loss.

Powerful Radar and Criminal Allegations

In February 2011 I was the victim of a combination of powerful radar assaults and false criminal allegations.

Both the criminal allegations and radar assaults attack and drain your finances needed to defend yourself from these.

The powerful radar was aimed at the body but was also focused on the shine bones linked to leukemia and criminal harassment participants stating "we want you white", a side effect of leukemia.

At the lungs causing irritation and difficulty breathing linked to lung cancer.

And aimed at the bones, targeting the bones of the body, causing pain and inflammation that I believe is linked to bone cancer.

Acid-Base Imbalance, Powerful Radar, Bone Cancer

I see a link with the several years of high levels of sleep deprivation and criminal harassment to destroy my health.

The acid-base imbalance that depletes calcium and results in bone loss combined with the following powerful radar assaults over several months that targets the bones in attempts to inflict or induce bone cancer.

 

 

 

Current View on Reality of Danny Hunt

This is my current view on reality of what has happened over these years and recently with the allegations fabricated from a Mobbing Research .. article that claim I uttered threats towards women, I believe it to be a smear campaign and repression through cancer to hide a conspiracy against an innocent minor linked to a failed smear campaign and setup in 2003-2004 when Stephan Hardy ceased to exist according to the Surete du Quebec.

Following a form of assassination attempt through the influence of the mind I reported what I was led to believe by a criminal harassment network, that I had caused the death of Celine Hardy the twin sister of Stephan Hardy when a minor.

I remember this day when a minor, it is the first day I experience criminal harassment, Stephan Hardy standing behind me and saying "you are going to suffer" along with a Surete du Quebec officer on the side of the pool that attempted to induce stress and fear. I was not told what had happened and only led to the conclusion through criminal harassment participants that I had caused the death of his sister much later when an adult.

Before reporting this conclusion to the Surete du Quebec this criminal harassment network tried to induce fear that I was being framed and had to run away, and used those words too "who told you". I reported the belief instead of running away.

"who told you?" - Surete du Quebec detective

Stephan Hardy ceased to exist and Celine Hardy was found alive, and I was charged with criminal mischief, which meant that I had to prove that I had caused her death to be found innocent of criminal mischief. A form of setup and attempt to "screw" or frame an innocent minor at a later time.

I believe the more recent 2011 allegations of uttering threats towards women on facebook combined with powerful radar assaults, a form of smear campaign and repression through cancer, to be an attempt to hide this conspiracy against a minor.

Shortly before these allegations I had filed complaints with the local Laval Police and asked the Quebec Ministers how someone could cease to exist like Stephan Hardy in 2004, which was followed by the allegations and radar assaults etc.

 

An Interesting Blog of May 27th, 2012 (Discrimination and Intervention: Incarceration and Psychological Evaluation)

Since my conditional release on Feb 23, 2011 with an "unlawful" assessment order for non-criminal responsibility the Laval Police tried several times to intervene linked to the behavior of shielding or protection measures against powerful radar assaults, this ceased around the same time or shortly before the assessment order expired.

In the last several months it became clear that the proceedings have a good chance of being stopped due to several Charter violations on June 4th and the assaults become more obviously aimed at causing serious damage to my lungs, testicles and prostate area, shins linked to bone marrow and leukemia, bones, and more recently the head and brain.

Daily assaults aimed at the lungs, shins, and testicles. Waking to powerful radar streams aimed at the leg shin bones, the testicles, and head. Over the several months, more than a year, I have been use to having my feet and shins assaulted at night, a weakness in my protection measures. More recently I have been waking to powerful radar streams aimed at my head and brain, with resulting strange sensations.

I am also, like the assaults that have increased in intensity over the last several months before June 4th taking more shielding and attenuation measures for these radar assaults and streams. Dielectric carbon/graphite tiles or ferric tiles wrapped with aluminum foil that are rested on a faraday cage, along with lead sheet and iron sheets too.

3 neighbors on the left side of the van from the direction of some powerful radar streams came from have sold their house and moving.

Discrimination and Intervention: Incarceration and Psychological Evaluation

One of my neighbors on the right of the house, Betty, called me on the day of the arrest telling me the police where outside, which resulted in me looking outside, which resulted in them seeing me in the house, which can then result in justification to break into a house with force from what I understand.

As I went to go outside I answered another caller, I told this caller I did not have time for the call, given I was going outside, this caller then identified themselves as a police officer with instructions .. etc. the arrest of Feb 21, 2011.

I believe this neighbor, "concern for me", along with calls for "suspicious vehicles" were used in the several appearances of the Laval Police and their concern with wanting to intervene due to the behavior of protection measures from powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, which results in incarceration and a psychological evaluation, the same incarceration and psychological evaluation that was refused, denied, or that they did not get through their demand for incarceration and a psychological evaluation on Feb 23, 2011 following the arrest.


 

Criminal Harassment Network Routine Documentation, Radiation Technology in Public Places - (newsflash)

Documenting a criminal harassment network's routines and strategies, this newsflash post involves radiation technology, powerful radar assaults, and focused ultrasound. (PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION page)

Assault Routines in Public Places

I wrote a routine that I was exposed to from 2007 - 20--, that involves sleep deprivation and a criminal harassment network. "A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived through sound technology (HSS), criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor, and attempts at repetitive humiliation.", which also used homelessness to induce fear "you have no future, your future is in the garbage, you are eating garbage, kill yourself, hang yourself, the homeless are in the anus, you are in the anus". Following criminal allegations here are some elements of what I have been exposed during the long and delayed criminal proceedings: powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, radiation technology assaults in public places, and focused ultrasound to "hit" the brain.

Radiation Technology

In public places like the cash register area, which was also involved in the mentioned routine, the credit card machine location for entering your information is an area where you'll suddenly experience a "shot in the testicles", powerful radar and the testicles. Other radiation technology examples are: being exposed to lung irritating microwave radiation, and your shins and feet being hit with similar powerful radar assaults.

Public Areas

In public areas the assault come from the storage and stock room areas. They aim at the shins and feet, and the butt, colon, prostate, and testicular area. Also the lungs, lung irritation, and head area. The focus seems to have been my shins and lungs, linked to lung cancer and leukemia; more recently it seems to be more on my testicles too. Lung cancer, leukemia, prostate, and testicular cancer.

Testicles and Degrading Themes

A man's testicles are targeted in specific locations such as where a person would enter their nip for a credit card, I do not know what the equivalent would be for women, their breast or their facial beauty linked to the jaw and oral cancer.

Night Time

Similar to the day time radiation energy assaults, victims can expect to wake with powerful radar streams aimed at their testicular, prostate, and colon area, throat lymph-node area, shins, back, heart, and lung area, and head and brain area.

Testicular Sterility and Male Infertility Strategy

From the above, radiation technology and assaults aimed at the testicles damage the testicles, which can lead to infertility, attempts to protect them over a long period of time by wearing a metal jackstrape "cooks" them, which can also lead to infertility.

Focused Ultrasound

Focused ultrasound is used to "hit" the brain, I believe I once had the top of my head "cooked" from a rented van, in a similar way I believe the mob and criminal harassment network are wiring some taxis to "hit" a person's brain with ultrasound technology. So when targeted by this network that I have been documenting and not being sure if they sent you a "special" taxi, you have to keep your head out of focus or the usual head aiming spot, where your head would usually be or risk feeling a sharp pain or strange head/brain pain sensations.

Intervention and Coercion

The behavior[1] resulting from powerful radar assaults from participating neighbors is supposed to help with creating justification for police intervention, shielding and attenuation measures or personal hygiene[2] that begins to suffer as a result of trying to avoid these for example, which leads to incarceration and non-criminal responsibility assessments before trial, or coercion towards choosing non-criminal responsibility before trial or risk getting a deadly form of cancer for resisting, to escape false allegations and serious charter violations. Non-criminal responsibility before trial is used to circumvent the right to a fair trial.

Court House

To help with the choice of choosing non-criminal responsibility before trial, coercion, and in attempts to provoke anger and frustration to destabilize a person through abuse (see Marie-France Hirigoyen) to create justification to intervene "he looked deranged"[3] the defendant is assaulted in the court house its self. It is similar to the previously mentioned justifications linked to behavior[1] and personal hygiene[2].

Homicide Through Leukemia

For several months during the criminal proceedings neighbors powerful radar from neighboring homes have been assaulting my shins during the day and try to "cook" me at night linked to bone marrow damage and leukemia.

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial

An "unlawful" assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial was issued that would sanction the criminal allegations and several charter violations such as entering a home without a warrant, seizure of computers without a warrant, the freedom of expression, etc,, along with several police attempts to intervene linked to the behavior of shielding and attenuation materials, protection measures from the assaults, which would result in incarceration and this assessment order. This threat of intervention reduces attempts to protect yourself, the risk of being incarcerated, vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and high costs, disconnected from managing your personal affairs, isolated, and framed through this assessment order.

Human Rights, Modern Countries vs. Other Countries

Other countries use more visible violence on their citizens, which results in human rights violation complaints with visible evidence. Modern countries are using radiation technology, powerful radar assaults, on their citizens linked to deadly cancers. Visible violence in other countries vs. radiation technology in modern countries to control and repress their own citizens, human rights violations.

OHCHR - June 17th, 2012

I would like to know if it is possible to receive a fax letter to confirm that my complaint, a thick binder that I sent several weeks ago, and a more recent fax was received? The reason for the request is that I do not know if I am being fooled by the Canadian Police and Secret Police/Service, etc,, as to OHCHR truly receive this package and complaint.

Attack of a Human Rights Defender; The complaint involves an attack on a human rights defender, I am the creator and founder of the only english website on psychological harassment, Psychological Harassment Information Association, which includes several human rights issues such as workplace psychological harassment (homelessness weapon), discrimination, and sexual harassment. Criminal allegations were fabricated from a published article with the title Mobbing Research .., claiming that I uttered threats towards women.

Circumventing The Right to a Fair Trial; The Canadian Criminal Judicial System attempted to circumvent my right to a fair trial through an "unlawful" assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, which would sanction the allegations of "uttering threats towards women", and several Canadian Charter Rights and Freedom Violations such as entering my home without a warrant, seizing my computers without a warrant, the freedom of expression, an Appeal for this assessment order before trial that "ceased to exist" during the proceedings, ..,

Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults; During the criminal proceedings, about sixteen months (16), I have been assaulted by powerful radar linked to leukemia, lung cancer, and other cancers from neighboring homes. I link these assaults to criminal harassment participants saying that I have to run "run away or get cancer" and several police attempts to intervene for my attempts to protect myself from these assaults using shielding and attenuation materials, which would lead to incarceration during the judicial proceedings and the "unlawful" assessment order before trial.

I was acquitted (not guilty) on June 4th, 2012 at trial, following the dismissal of six Charter violations presented before trial, freedom of expression, entering a home without a warrant, seizing computers without a warrant, ..,. I am still assaulted by powerful radar during the Civil Lawsuit proceedings against the -- Police and Canadian Crown Prosecutors.

I will soon send the acquittal transcript to add to the complaint documents.

 

THE TWELFTH STRATEGY -- POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS

Thermal imaging (FLIR thermal imaging device, Privacy , R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC) and radioactive isotopes are used to circumvent the privacy of a home, in a similar way radiation technology or powerful radar assaults linked to deadly cancers, death, on a longer term than other deadly weapons are used to assault a citizen with a weapon in their own home to circumvent the right to security, the right to liberty linked to psychiatric intervention leading to incarceration, the right to a trial through non-criminal responsibility before trial, discourage access to the justice system and civil recourse aka lawsuits for malicious allegations, and on a long term the right to life.

The twelfth strategy is linked to the first strategy, the use of non-criminal responsibility to circumvent the right to a fair trial, and the seventh strategy, the use of intervention leading to incarceration to circumvent the right to liberty.

Radioactive isotopes in the brain of deceased people can be seen six feet underground from space, which can be linked to different targeting systems aimed at citizens using radiation and radar technology similar to programs aimed at missiles aka the Star-Wars program, and neighboring homes similar to thermal imaging.

Radar assaults from neighboring homes during criminal proceedings are linked to intervention leading to incarceration and non-criminal responsibility assessment orders before before trial during criminal proceedings, which circumvents the right to a trial, sanctions the criminal allegations, and charter violations such as entering a home without a warrant and seizing private property without a warrant.

Example

Following false allegations and charter violation such as entering a home without a warrant and seizing private computers, personal information, citizens are released with assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial. The resulting behavior from radar assaults such as claims of radar assaults, shielding and protection measures, personal hygiene and household that begins to suffer as they try to avoid these, anger and frustration, etc, are all used to justify police and psychiatric intervention leading to incarceration and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial. Non-criminal responsibility before trial sanctions the criminal allegations and charter violations, entering a home without a warrant, and seizing personal computers, personal information aka the right to privacy. A trial and presentation of charter violations that would stay the proceedings are not needed, the defendant is not guilty of having committed the crime due to mental illness.

 

Participating Defense Lawyers Scenario Example

The defense lawyer that I was provided told me I had no choice but to remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation, a demand by the Police, so I fired him. He later returned claiming he had spoken to my mother and that I would be released with conditions, I agreed. The conditions were read, and an assessment order was added after these conditions to my surprise for non-criminal responsibility, which I did not want and had made it clear that the allegations were false to this lawyer. Following this he was again fired, I believe it was a setup, a participating defense lawyer, and he attempted to help the Police and Crown prosecutor.

Participating Defense Lawyers: The information I wish to share with you, participating defense lawyers, is linked to this event.

1. Means of Subsistence: Throughout these criminal proceedings my means of subsistence, my disability income, have been threatened by criminal harassment participants who claim that because I was defending myself and representing myself, I was working.

2. Intervention: Throughout these criminal proceedings I have been threatened with intervention, a vulnerability which would lead to incarceration during these proceedings, to the "unlawful" assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, and a vulnerability to participating defense lawyers.

What I find disturbing is that the crown did not ask for the trial, which he is supposed to do, and even if it has been made obvious over several months that the allegations were false, the Police maintained that their allegations were valid at trial. I was acquitted.

 

Criminal Harassment Network

HOMELESSNESS MOBBING WEAPON: The criminal harassment network that I have been documenting is linked to the Police and Criminal Judicial System, they use homelessness and threats of homelessness extensively. They use intimidation and threats to eliminate a person's means of subsistence, which is linked to workplace psychological harassment to eliminate a person's means of subsistence combined with public criminal harassment that reduce the credibility of victims. Eliminating a person's means of subsistence and homelessness are used to circumvent the rights and freedoms that citizens are said to have and to make them vulnerable to crime,

SLEEP DEPRIVATION: This criminal harassment uses participants that use sound technology, possibly the HSS Hypersonic Sound technology or similar to the LRAD systems that focus sound at specific locations to sleep deprive victims and combine this with their criminal harassment over long periods of time, which is linked to serious illness, acid-base imbalance and calcium depletion aka macromineral depletion, and cancer.

CANCER: This criminal harassment network combines radiation technology and powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes and public places with criminal allegations where the victims of these are supposed to "run away or get cancer", which results in looking guilty and incarceration during the long criminal proceedings. Protection measures, shielding and attenuation measures, are linked to threats of intervention and justifying intervention leading to incarceration for psychological evaluations, and so do claims of being assaulted by radiation technology and powerful radar. On the long term the radiation technology and powerful radar assaults are linked to repressing citizens through serious illness and cancer, leukemia and lung cancer, death and homicides.

MEDICAL SYSTEM: Once victims are vulnerable through serous illness or cancer they also become vulnerable to coercion tactics and threats linked to stress, which is linked to the criminal harassment. The victims of serious illness and cancer, homicides, are hidden through the medical system.

THREATS: They use threats to obtain participants, threats to their own means of subsistence, and threats of doing the same to loved ones or family members.

SUMMARY: The mob eliminates a person's means of subsistence and uses homelessness pre-criminal allegations and during criminal allegation proceedings to make conviction easier, intimidation, to "clean" police wrong doing, and prevent the exposure of human rights violations. The mob is combining technology with criminal harassment and involved in repressing citizens through homelessness or serious illness, cancer, and death.

Human Rights Offenders and Homicides - (newsflash)

The Canadian Police, "Secret Police", and Criminal Judicial System are linked to using homelessness to prevent the exposure of crimes and human rights violations committed against citizens, and assaulting citizens in their own homes with radiation technology and powerful radar linked to deadly cancers, lung cancer and leukemia. Some human rights violating countries use other methods to kill their own citizens, this is Canada's method, which may also be that of related countries such as Great Britain and Australia. The United Nations cannot prove this type of homicide is committed and does not have the evidence to intervene or reprimand human rights offenders that use this method, radiation technology and cancer.

 

REMINDER, WORKS IN PROGRESS

Homicide Attempts and Motives, Current View on Reality of Danny Hunt

The homicide attempt through psychological manipulation, an attempt to manipulate me into suicide, a hanging attempt, is linked to the Surete du Quebec officer on the side of the pool when I was a minor and an attempt by the mob to "clean" them. Possible promises to make a minor suffer through homelessness when an adult directly from a Surete du Quebec officer.

This second attempt through radiation technology and radar assaults linked to leukemia and lung cancer includes this one, promises to make a minor suffer at a later time, and the fact that I am a human rights defender with the only English website about psychological harassment, which documents this mobs homicide methods, psychological manipulation linked to suicide and radiation technology linked to deadly cancers.

Workplace psychological harassment linked to using homelessness as a weapon and to "clean" the police, preventing exposure of crimes committed against citizens and human rights violations, circumventing the rights of citizens to make conviction easier, .., etc.

 

Seventeen Strategies to Circumvent the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-733909

THE FIRST STRATEGY
MENTAL ILLNESS, DISCRIMINATION, THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

The first strategy uses assessment orders before trial, disability and mental illness, and participating psychiatrists to circumvent the right to a fair trial.

The strategy is linked to smear campaigns and using assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility of committing a crime due to mental illness before trial when the accused has not committed a crime. It uses ignorance or the claim that being not guilty of committing a crime due to mental illness is the same as simply being not guilty. The accused does not go to trial or get a trial.

This strategy means that each year the Police can use false allegations, uttered threats for example, break down the accused's door and damage personal property, search his home without a warrant, seize computers without a warrant, and escape It all through an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness, circumventing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms regarding the need for search warrants, entering and searching a dwelling home, seizure of computers and private information, and the right to a fair trial.

THE SECOND STRATEGY
THE SEIZURE OF COMPUTERS, PRIVATE INFORMATION

The second strategy involves the seizure of computers without a warrant, returning the seized computers, and claiming the accused cannot prove the Police have made copies and therefore cannot ask for a court order that any existing copies from the seizure be destroyed.

This strategy means that without the court order for any existing copies to be destroyed the Police may have copies of private information from the seizure of computers and may use it at a later time resulting in circumventing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Difference:

1. A Prosecutor mistaken or having been misinformed about the existence of copies to benefit in the proceedings at a later time means the accused has to sue him for damages, and he may not be liable or subject to a complaint with the chief Crown Prosecutor.

2. If a Judge issues an order for the destruction of any existing copies and it is later discovered the Police and Prosecutor have copies, searched them, and attempt to use them, these are illegal acts.

THE THIRD STRATEGY
COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION, PRIVACY, SECURITY OF THE PERSON

False allegations of uttering threats along with insinuations that the accused is dangerous can be used to obtain communications interception and surveillance under section 183 of the criminal code.

Court delays, unlawful orders, prosecutors that do not want to drop the charges but do not want to ask for a trial either knowing the allegations are false extend the period of time that the accused is under communications interception and surveillance, and circumvents the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

THE FOURTH STRATEGY

INFORMATION/DENOUNCIATION

The Information/Denounciation is the criminal allegations that a Justice indicates without a signature, the Justice signature is a stamp on the front blue sheet of the Prosecutors file.

If the defendant is given the Prosecutors file without this important document at the beginning of the proceedings this document can actually be modified when provided later, the document is not signed.

THE FIFTH STRATEGY
THE HOMELESSNESS WEAPON

Citizens are presented with the believe that they have rights and civil liberties, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but they are circumvented through the use of homelessness, the homelessness weapon.

The Police, Criminal Judicial System, and Mob are linked to eliminating a citizens means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations or during long delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to make a conviction or smear campaign easier, mobbing.

THE SIXTH STRATEGY
JUDGE/ACCUSED ASKS FOR TRIAL

Following criminal allegations the Crown Prosecutor is supposed to ask for a trial, to prosecute, or drop the charges, not a Judge or the Accused.

There are reasons why in some cases the Crown Prosecutor would not want ask for a trial such as knowing the allegations are false or he does not have a strong case and would not want to be responsible for a trial or the expense linked to the failed prosecution.

Criminal allegations make a citizen vulnerable to organized crime and different patterns linked to the mob or mobbing, the accused eventually lose their means of subsistence, if they were not eliminated pre-criminal allegations, making prosecution easier and the possibility of being sued for malicious allegations or prosecutions unlikely, so delays in asking for trial are in the favor of Crown Prosecutors, linked to the Accused being under pressure from the mob or workplace psychological harassment and wishing to go to trial to prove their innocence as soon as possible. In the case where the Accused can withstand these pressures from the mob or organized crime and the Crown Prosecutor does not wish to ask for the trial, a Judge can be used to do it, to increase the delays and the links to them. This strategy circumvents the Charter by removing the responsibility for prosecution, malicious prosecutions, from the Crown Prosecutors and placing the responsibility on the Accused, or a Judge.

THE SEVENTH STRATEGY
INTERVENTION AND INCARCERATION

The seventh strategy uses intervention to circumvent the right to liberty, which leads to incarceration at a prison psychiatric institution similar to the first strategy that uses non-criminal responsibility assessment orders before trial to circumvent the right to a fair trial.

1. Motive non-criminal responsibility before trial.
2. Motive incarceration.
3. Motive repression through powerful radar assaults and serious illness, cancer.

The police, criminal judicial system, and mob are linked to combining criminal allegations with powerful radar assaults over long and delayed criminal proceedings.

1.a) non-criminal responsibility, before trial is mentioned in the first strategy to escape false allegations and charter violation before trial and to circumvent the right to a fair trial.
2.a) behavior, the behavior linked to victims of powerful radar assaults attempting to attenuate powerful radar through materials aka metal or shield themselves from these is used to justify intervention leading to incarceration at a prison psychiatric institution.
2.b) run away, victims of powerful radar assaults that run away are recaptured and incarcerated for violating their conditions for release and for running away.
2.c) personal hygiene, the personal hygiene of victims of powerful radar assaults begins to suffer as they try to avoid these or prevented from cleaning their homes or taking baths by these assaults.
2.d) seemed deranged, these assaults along with criminal harassment participant threats and provocation are used to anger or enrage victims, who then seem deranged or unstable, leading to justification for incarceration.
2.e) money, victims of radar assaults who suddenly begin to spend to stay at hotels to avoid assaults or for protections measures against these assaults, shielding and attenuation, a large expense added to the already large expense of judicial proceedings and legal representation can be used to justify intervention.
2.f) claims of radar assaults, the claim of being assaulted by powerful radar its self can be used to justify police intervention leading to a psychiatric institution and incarceration. Note, the psychiatric institution members do not do criminal investigations for weapons assaults, they treat illness.
3.a) threats of intervention leading to incarceration and the threat of being found guilty through non-criminal responsibility before trial is used to discourage the behavior of take protection measures against powerful radar assaults, shielding and attenuation of powerful radar, making victims more vulnerable to the effects of these, serious illness and cancer.
3.b) the powerful radar assaults over several months and years, over long and delayed criminal proceedings for example, leads to serious illness and cancer.

This strategy is linked to incarceration during long and delayed criminal proceedings, isolation, increasing the legal cost of the criminal proceedings, creating a vulnerability to participating defense lawyers, creating a vulnerability to others, obtaining private medical information, and creating a vulnerability to participating prison psychiatrists, the first strategy to circumvent the right to a fair trial through an assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility that would sanction false allegations and charter violations such as the seizure of private information without a warrant, computers.

THE EIGHTH STRATEGY
PARTICIPATING DEFENSE LAWYERS/PSYCHIATRISTS

Participating defense lawyers are used by the mob to help in the high cost of criminal proceedings and a successful conviction that is hard to Appeal given the "representation" by legal council, a defense lawyer. Any claim by the accused that this defense lawyer was used in a setup and participated in a smear campaign, framing the accused, results in a lawsuit against the accused and more expenses, another mob strategy.

Participating psychiatrists can help with assessment orders that are given before trial for non-criminal responsibility or in attempts to control the criminal proceedings through a participating defense lawyer.

THE NINTH STRATEGY
CRIMINAL HARASSMENT

Criminal harassment has been mentioned in other previous strategies, criminal harassment networks, the use of technology, the 2005 award winning sound technology that can be used for criminal harassment in a victims own home and high levels of sleep deprivation, powerful radar assaults in a victims own home linked to deadly forms of cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, while the accused is already overwhelmed financially by criminal allegations, insinuations that he is dangerous, and Police or Psychiatric intervention that would lead to incarceration during the criminal proceedings. Incarceration leading to other vulnerabilities, increased expense for legal council, and bad legal council or legal council that benefits in long criminal proceedings, participating psychiatrists, external members that the accused is now dependent on and vulnerable to to manage their affairs etc.

THE TENTH STRATEGY
CANCER

Similar to the way the mob and criminal harassment networks use workplace psychological harassment to eliminate a person's means of subsistence pre-criminal allegations, the mob and criminal harassment networks are now involved in attempts to destroy a person's health through high levels of sleep deprivation and criminal harassment pre-criminal allegations. During criminal allegations the accused is assaulted with powerful radar over long and delayed criminal proceedings in attempts to add more overwhelming expenses to the already overwhelming cost of legal council representation, to justify intervention and incarceration during the criminal proceedings, and to induce different types of cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, and a favorite for men, prostate and testicular cancer.

THE ELEVENTH STRATEGY
LAWSUITS

As previously mentioned in the fifth strategy the use of homelessness as a weapon in mobbing in modern society is linked to the Police, Criminal Judicial System, and the mob to make prosecution or conviction easier, and prevent lawsuits. The use of homelessness as weapon and poverty for repression and oppression is linked to the Charter and attempts to circumvent the Charter.

The strategy that involves the use of participating defense lawyers, that can result in defamation lawsuits if the accused claims a defense lawyer participated in malicious allegations and a smear campaign, is linked to defendants representing themselves due to this threat. Their inexperience can make them vulnerable to Crown Prosecutors and civil lawsuits.

THE TWELFTH STRATEGY
POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS

Thermal imaging (FLIR thermal imaging device, Privacy , R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC) and radioactive isotopes are used to circumvent the privacy of a home, in a similar way radiation technology or powerful radar assaults linked to deadly cancers, death, on a longer term than other deadly weapons are used to assault a citizen with a weapon in their own home to circumvent the right to security, the right to liberty linked to psychiatric intervention leading to incarceration, the right to a trial through non-criminal responsibility before trial, discourage access to the justice system and civil recourse aka lawsuits for malicious allegations, and on a long term the right to life.

The twelfth strategy is linked to the first strategy, the use of non-criminal responsibility to circumvent the right to a fair trial, and the seventh strategy, the use of intervention leading to incarceration to circumvent the right to liberty.

Radioactive isotopes in the brain of deceased people can be seen six feet underground from space, which can be linked to different targeting systems aimed at citizens using radiation and radar technology similar to programs aimed at missiles aka the Star-Wars program, and neighboring homes similar to thermal imaging.

Radar assaults from neighboring homes during criminal proceedings are linked to intervention leading to incarceration and non-criminal responsibility assessment orders before before trial during criminal proceedings, which circumvents the right to a trial, sanctions the criminal allegations, and charter violations such as entering a home without a warrant and seizing private property without a warrant.

Money, victims of radar assaults who suddenly begin to spend to stay at hotels to avoid these or for protections measures against these assaults, shielding and attenuation, adds a large expense to the already large expense of judicial proceedings and legal representation. It can help bankrupt a victim and help prevent civil lawsuits.

THE THIRTEENTH STRATEGY
RACIAL PROFILING

There has been a lot of talk about racial profiling but it has been rejected by most judicial system courts because of its link to discrimination.

Similar to a strategy to create false profiles by the mob to help in future prosecutions that was previously mentioned, racial profiles and other types of profiles can be fabricated and created simply to justify different actions linked to abuse or circumventing the rights and freedoms of citizens.

Imagine a racial profile that claims a specific ethnic is more likely to be involved in drug trafficking and a racial profile is used to justify a search without a warrant, circumventing the need for a warrant for a lawful search and seizure.

THE FOURTEENTH STRATEGY
YOUTH PROTECTION LAWS

Youth protection laws exist to protect the youths who commit crimes at an early age, the youths are convicted in youth courts and the files are sealed. Here is an example of how this law can be twisted to circumvent a youths rights linked to motive and intent, to make them suffer as adults.

Imagine an accidental homicide caused by one minor, another minor is used to state that he is going to suffer at a later time, used in criminal harassment, this youths file is sealed, sealing and hiding the motive and intent for when the other youth is an adult and attacked through organized. The mob uses workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment in attempts to use homelessness as a weapon, to make this adult suffer.

THE FIFTEENTH STRATEGY
RAGE SHOOTINGS

This one is very controversial, it involves the right to bear arms and the idea that a well armed population is its best defense against dictatorship. Here is an example of how this right can be circumvented to lead to different forms of dictatorships through organized crime.

Organized crime uses workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment to use homelessness as a weapon and to circumvent the rights of citizens, which is linked to rage shootings and an interest in abusing citizens to cause rage shootings, which leads to advocating gun control and an unarmed or defenseless population.

Dictatorships have news and "freedom of the press" too, this is not the deterrent and protection from dictatorships, a well armed population that can rise up and overthrow any dictatorship or abusive authorities is. Dictators and abusive authorities know and fear this, which would be linked to the incentive of wanting a defenseless population.

THE SIXTEENTH STRATEGY
HSS HYPERSONIC SOUND TECHNOLOGY/FOCUSED ULTRASOUND

HSS is an award winning technology that creates sound at specific locations and at great distances, it is used to sleep deprive a citizen over a long period of time and before important appearances. Sleep deprivation is linked to premature aging, leads to acid-base imbalance, and increases the risk of cancer. Focused ultrasound is also a technology that can be used to create lesions in the brain or heart, strokes and heart attacks. It is used for criminal harassment, threats, subjugation, and also used to provoke victims when they are under communication interception and surveillance by the police.

Another type of weapon similar to radiation technology and radar assaults used to inflict physical damage on citizens in their own home, which circumvents the right to security and on a long term the right to life.

"Elwood "Woody" Norris, founder and Chairman of American Technology Corporation (ATC), announced he had successfully created a device which achieved ultrasound transmission of sound in 1996.[5] ATC named and trademarked their device as "HyperSonic Sound" (HSS). In February 1998, HSS was named the Best of What's New for 1997 by readers of Popular Science.[6] In December 2002, Popular Science named HyperSonic Sound the best invention of 2002.[citation needed] Norris received the 2005 Lemelson-MIT Prize for his invention of a "hypersonic sound".[7] ATC (now named LRAD Corporation) spun off the technology to Parametric Sound Corporation in September 2010 to focus on their Long Range Acoustic Device products (LRAD), according to their quarterly reports, press releases and executive statements.[8][9]"

THE SEVENTEENTH STRATEGY
PSYCHIATRIC PROFILES

Criminal harassment networks, criminal harassment participants, mobbing participants, .. , use psychiatric profiles to induce fear in their victims linked to creating false profiles for easier convictions of future criminal allegations and mentioned in racial profiling strategy.

Racial profiling is linked to discrimination and used to justify circumventing rights and freedoms, false profiles are used to induce fear and in smear campaigns, the right to security and liberty.

The words by participants can be "profile", you are going to be "psycho-analyzed", we are going to "fill you up" aka fill up/create a profile.

Scenario example, it can involve insinuations that the victim is pedophile leading to discussions of the these insinuation and criminal harassment with psychiatrists. Medical files are confidential, so how is this psychiatric profile going to be used in future convictions or smear campaigns? Through criminal allegations along with police demands for a psychological evaluations. Once this profile is created, filled up, mobbing participants or organized crime participants can plant child pornography on a computer, through criminal allegations the police can seize the computers, and make a demand for evaluation, which obtains the profile for easier conviction and smear campaign. This example involves the pedophilia weapon where threats of allegations induce fear and stick even when found innocent, create a vulnerability to crime and blackmail, generates instant hatred towards the defendant, and used in smear campaigns.

ABUSE OF PROCESS, STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Violations of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in criminal allegations and court proceedings can be addressed in court before trial, which can result in a Stay of Proceedings.

THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects Canadians from "oppressive laws", a stay of proceedings is given for violations, laws are modified or repealed, and attempts to circumvent the Charter are linked to oppression.

U.S. AMENDMENTS AND BILL OF RIGHTS

In the U.S. these strategies would be like the Police and Prosecutors trying to circumvent the U.S. Amendments and Bill of Rights. "They guarantee a number of personal freedoms, limit the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and reserve some powers to the states and the public."

Why Write These Strategies?

Why write these strategies or possibilities, so that measures can be taken to make sure that they can not be used.

Awareness and prevention, protecting our Rights and Freedom, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, similar to the U.S. Amendments and Bill of Rights.

EXAMPLES

THE FIRST STRATEGY
MENTAL ILLNESS, DISCRIMINATION, THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL

Lower Court Judges and Circumventing a Fair Trial Through Non-Criminal Responsibility Scenario Example

Release Day Judge: released with "unlawful" non-criminal responsibility before trial "from what I understand the non-criminal responsibility before trial is to help you out" , insinuations that the defendant is guilty and can escape being "guilty" through non-criminal responsibility. -- Another Lower Court Judge Day: "charter violations are presented at trial but you won't need a trial if you are non-criminally responsible, if you are already proven non-guilty why have a trial?" -- So in this scenario example the lower court judges know that non-criminal responsibility before trial is being used to circumvent a fair trial, which results in sanctioned criminal allegations and charter violations such as: entering a dwelling home without a warrant, seizing computers without a warrant, analyzing the data on the computers from what is now a sanctioned or legal seizure for other new criminal allegations, .. ,

Intervention and Coercion (see SEVENTH STRATEGY)

The behavior resulting from powerful radar assaults from participating neighbors is supposed to help with creating justification for police intervention, shielding and attenuation measures or personal hygiene that begins to suffer as a result of trying to avoid these for example, which leads to incarceration and non-criminal responsibility assessments before trial, or coercion towards choosing non-criminal responsibility before trial or risk getting a deadly form of cancer for resisting, to escape false allegations and serious charter violations.

Example 1

Assessment Orders Before Trial and "Unlawful"

A judge issues an order after a demand by the prosecutor for an assessment, an evaluation for non-criminal responsibility before trial without any supporting evidence, which is unlawful according to judge Pittfield R v. Muschke, assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility are supposed to be made at the end of trial, interferes with an accused's defense and is discrimination if they are not, Supreme Court of Canada R v. Swain, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, requiring Appeals that are expensive and linked to delays, while attempts are made to force or complete this assessment order before it is Appealed, which circumvents the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Example 2

Threat of Being Framed To Accept Assessment Order

Behavior and corruption are used to intimidate and threaten the accused towards accepting a plea of non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness before trial. "they are going to frame you" "the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility is to help you".

THE SECOND STRATEGY
THE SEIZURE OF COMPUTERS, PRIVATE INFORMATION

Example 3

"you cannot prove the police have copies"

After seizing computers without a warrant, keeping the computers for several weeks, the computers are returned. An Application for Destruction of any existing copies in any form be destroyed is rejected. The prosecutor argument "the accused cannot prove the police have copies and to his knowledge there are no copies".

THE THIRD STRATEGY
COMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION, PRIVACY, SECURITY OF THE PERSON

Example 4

False Allegations, Communications Interception

After false allegations of uttering threats 264.1 (1)(a) to cause death or serious bodily harm, insinuations the accused is dangerous, communications interception can be requested under section 183, 184, of the criminal code.

Example 5

False Allegations, Communications Interception, Threats

The use of false allegations, uttering threats s. 264 (1)(a) for example, to obtain communication interception under section s. 183 for surveillance and internet usage to threaten or eliminate a person's welfare or disability income under false pretenses, the homelessness weapon, in attempts to escape false allegations similar to the assessment order before trial, while the accused attempts to defend themselves from these allegations.

THE SIXTH STRATEGY
JUDGE/ACCUSED ASKS FOR TRIAL

Example 6

Some examples linked to pressure from the mob or organized crime during criminal allegations that have been reported:

a) workplace psychological harassment with different threats to the accused's means of subsistence.

b) the use of sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, used for criminal harassment and threat's in the accused's own home or for high levels of sleep deprivation, high levels of sleep deprivation before court appearances.

c) powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes in the accused's own home linked to deadly cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, testicular cancer, and the increasing risk for these as the length in criminal proceedings increases.

Example 7

The use of sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, used for criminal harassment and threat's in the accused's own home or for high levels of sleep deprivation, high levels of sleep deprivation before court appearances. The criminal harassment, threats, and provocation are interpreted as being part of an investigation if the accused is also under communications interception or surveillance. The angry response to these threats and criminal harassment are interpreted as "the Police is listening, investigation".

THE SEVENTH STRATEGY
INTERVENTION AND INCARCERATION

Behavior Scenario Illustration Example, Motive Incarceration (8 a)) (2.a):

After being released under conditions and an "unlawful" assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, I was assaulted by powerful radar. The Police tried to intervene several times claiming the behavior linked to shielding and attenuation attempts, "microwaves?", was not normal, which would result in my incarceration at the prison psychiatric institute. -- I was later found "guilty" without a trial through "non-criminal responsibility", which sanctioned the false allegations, searching my home without a warrant, seizing personal computers and information without a warrant, communication interception and surveillance, ..

Run Away Scenario Illustration Example (2.b):

During the long and delayed criminal proceedings I was assaulted daily with powerful radar assaults along with criminal harassment participants that claimed "you have to run". Fearing that I'd get leukemia, lung cancer, or testicular cancer I ran away only to be recaptured and incarcerated for violating the conditions for my release and a psychological evaluation.

Personal Hygiene Scenario Illustration Examples (2.c):

1. When I try to prepare food or wash dishes in the kitchen, powerful radar streams come from the large window that faces a neighbors home side wall, the legs, testicles, and lungs. -- 2. When I go down stairs to wash the dishes, powerful radar comes from the other side, the other home, towards my back and colon area. -- 3. When I try to take a bath, again I'm assaulted with powerful radar. -- Personal hygiene is used as a justification to intervene during these long and delayed criminal proceedings, which results in incarceration at the prison psychiatric institution.

Seemed Unstable Scenario Illustration Example (2.d):

During the long and delayed criminal proceedings where I had to appeal "unlawful" orders requiring expensive transcripts and legal services, showing up in court early in the morning only to see all the other lawyers being streamlined before me and my case always being set back to the afternoon, subjected to obvious wrong doing such as motions and appeals that "ceased to exist" resulting in an automatic loss and wasted day combined with staff hypocrisy in what seemed to be attempts to anger me, .. , being isolated and alone I started talking to myself in disbelief and about what I thought was serious abuse, which resulted in the staff and guards calling for psychiatric intervention "he seemed deranged". -- Note that this is a general example of using abuse and frustration to destabilize a person (see Marie-France Hirigoyen) or use their resulting anger against them or for justification to request intervention, an example for 2.d) is still required.

Abuse, Discrimination, Intervention Scenario Illustration Example, Motive Incarceration and Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial

One of my neighbors called me on the day of the arrest telling me the police where outside, which resulted in me looking outside, which resulted in them seeing me in the house, which can then result in justification to break into a house with force from what I understand. -- On the day in court the Police made a demand that I remain incarcerated for a psychological evaluation, it was denied and I was released on conditions and with an "unlawful" assessment order before trial for non-criminal responsibility. -- I believe this neighbor's "concern for me" along with calls for "suspicious vehicles" were used in the several appearances of the Police and their "concern" or wanting to intervene due to the behavior of protection measures from powerful radar assaults from neighboring homes, which results in incarceration and a psychological evaluation, the same incarceration and psychological evaluation that was refused, denied, or that they did not get through their demand for incarceration and a psychological evaluation following the arrest

A disability is a vulnerability that can be exploited by the Police, Crown Prosecutors, mob, organized crime, criminal harassment participants and networks etc. The seventh strategy circumvents the Charter by exploiting a disability, a vulnerability, and discrimination.

This strategy is similar and linked to the first one that can consists of attempts to incarcerate citizens for psychological evaluation and during the long criminal proceedings, resulting in great legal representation costs, to bankrupt the accused, assessment orders that are unlawful without any supporting evidence for non-criminal responsibility due to mental illness before trial when released on conditions. The mobs use of powerful radar assaults that lead to increased expenses as victims of these try to avoid these assaults or purchase expensive shielding materials, metal or lead, threats of intervention linked to attempts to avoid these, running away, or shielding efforts, which lead to incarceration for evaluation, being incarcerated during the long criminal proceedings along with the high cost of legal representation, and the increased risk of being framed through participants, participating defense lawyers or psychiatrists, the claim that you are not guilty due to mental illness of having committed the crime, when the accused has not committed the crime but would sanction wrong doing such as false allegations and search/seizures without warrants, linked to the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial, which according to the Supreme Court of Canada is supposed to be made at the end of trial as to not interfere with the defense, and discrimination.

Example 8

a) Following a demand that the accused remain incarcerated for psychological evaluation that fails and a conditional release with a demand for an assessment order for non-criminal responsibility that succeeds, the accused is assaulted by powerful radar leading to strange behavior, deteriorating personal hygiene as they try to avoid these and attempts to shield themselves from these through the use of dense materials, the police try to intervene, which leads to incarceration during the proceedings and the "unlawful" assessment order before trial.

b) Private Information, if the police are after private information and involved in wrong doing, the search and seizure of private computers without a warrant, incarceration for psychological evaluation and intervention leading to incarceration combined with the unlawful assessment order before trial leads to obtaining more private information, private medical information.

c) Time, Orders that are unlawful can be Appealed, Appeals increase legal costs, and even more expensive when incarcerated combined with another important factor, pressure to complete the unlawful assessment order or risk incarceration, non-criminal responsibility that sanctions the allegations, wrong doing, and to obtain the private medical information before it can be Appealed.

d) Smear Campaign scenario or strategy:
- no criminal record;
- a disability, mental illness;
- in 2005 uttered threats towards grandmothers and old ladies; non-criminally responsible
- in 2006 uttered threats towards two girls on the sidewalk; non-criminally responsible
- in 2007 uttered threats towards little baby girls; non-criminally responsible
- in 2008 uttered threats towards .. women; non-criminally responsible

"It says you have no criminal record or history of violence, and you claim you didn't get trials for these allegations, this is not my problem today, you should have addressed this at those times. What I have in front of me Mr -- is something that leads me to believe that you are a threat to society and a very dangerous person .. I wish to incarcerate you for the next hundred years etc."

Example 9

Intervention and Vulnerability, during the release with an assessment order for non-criminally responsible the Police use the threat of intervention linked to the behavior, incarceration, high cost of legal representation, being vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists, being framed, and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility. Criminal harassment network participant use the threat of intervention linked to behavior, the protection measures from their powerful radar assaults, which are linked to deadly cancers, leukemia, lung cancer, etc.

Example 10

Disability, mental illness, is used as a justification to demand the accused remain incarcerated for evaluation, justification to demand surveillance etc.

The seventh strategy circumvents the Charter by exploiting a disability, a vulnerability, and discrimination.

THE EIGHTH STRATEGY
PARTICIPATING DEFENSE LAWYERS/PSYCHIATRISTS

Example 11

Following a demand by the Police that the accused remain incarcerated for an evaluation the participating defense lawyer tells the accused that he has no choice but to remain incarcerated where he would be vulnerable to participating defense lawyers, the high cost of legal council, and participating psychiatrists.

Example 12

In certain cases in the criminal code some demands can only be made by a defense lawyer but may be in the interest of the Police and Crown prosecutors. A participating defense lawyer can help in attempts to circumvent the criminal code restrictions.

Example 13

Participating psychiatrists are linked to private medical information that is given to the Crown prosecutor and Police, the possibility of fabricating psychological profiles to help the police and prosecutors in prosecutions, and assessments orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial that would sanction false allegations, incarceration, police wrong doing, search and seizures without warrants, and prevent lawsuits.

Smear campaigns often involve the use of the pedophilia weapon where the allegations immediately result in intense hatred and a label that sticks but can also involve other allegations such as "women hater".

Example 14

One strategy used by criminal harassment networks and participants is to use insinuation of pedophilia to put victims on the defensive and the threat of being labeled a pedophile to induce fear. One routine is to claim that they are going to "file up" a victim through a false "profile" and "psycho-analysis", the insinuations and discussions with a psychiatrist. For any victims of this type of criminal harassment strategy and threat, "going to fill you up, profile, psycho-analyzed", who wondered how this threat worked or how private medical information would be able to fall into the hands of prosecutors in the first place, the mechanism used, criminal allegations followed by a demand for assessment that transfers the private medical information to participating psychiatrists is the mechanism used in possible attempts to create false psychological profiles by criminal harassment participants, "profile" "going to fill you up" "psycho-analyzed" etc.

This strategy circumvents the Canadian Charter for a right to a Fair Trial, Security of the Person, Privacy, and Liberty.

THE NINTH STRATEGY
CRIMINAL HARASSMENT

Here are some examples of criminal harassment directly linked to the criminal proceedings:

Example 15

Criminal allegations can result from victims of criminal harassment participants or networks using threats to induce fear, resulting in victims uttering threats in return, resulting in criminal allegations of uttering threats, and uttering threats can be used for communications interception and surveillance. The accused is criminally harassed in his own home through sound technology, the 2005 award winning HSS Hypersonic Sound, and this criminal harassment, threats and provocation, the angry response to threats and provocation is interpreted as part of an investigation by the criminal harassment participants "the police are listening".

Example 16

The accused is highly sleep deprived before court appearances, at the court house criminal harassment participants attempt to induce as much stress and adrenaline as possible before the accused presents himself and his case before a court judge. Due to the high levels of stress and adrenaline the accused has more difficulty communicating and presenting his case.

The Criminal Harassment and these criminal harassment examples circumvent the Canadian Charter by interfering with a Fair Trial, the Security of the Person, and Liberty.

THE TENTH STRATEGY
CANCER

Example 17

Criminal harassment participants use the 2005 award winning sound technology, HSS Hypersonic Sound, for criminal harassment and high levels of sleep deprivation combined with criminal harassment at local public places, see the routine example.

A routine example is that I would go to a grocery store when highly sleep deprived through sound technology (HSS), criminal harassment participants would mix in with other shoppers and use different forms of threats and provocation to induce stress and adrenaline, try to stand directly behind me at the cash register, and interpret the adrenaline and voice fluctuations as fear, which is linked to fear and honor, and attempts at repetitive humiliation.

Example 18

This example involves a series of steps 1. powerful radar assaults begin 2. criminal allegations that trap the accused 3. insinuation that the accused is dangerous and needs to remain incarcerated 4. after release the behavior linked being assaulted by powerful radar is used to justify intervention in attempts to incarcerate the accused 5. if incarcerated the accused is vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists used by the mob 6. if the accused is not incarcerated the mob continues in it's attempts to induce high levels of damage and cancers 7. bitterness and anger at the police and mob 8. incarceration and cancer 9. death through cancer 10. hidden homicides through the medical system

A "cooking" process before incarceration, to make a person suffer through cancer, and to prevent release or exposure at a later time.

Example 19

Rage shootings, imagine this scenario, the mob begins assaulting a citizen with powerful radar, the police file criminal allegations that he uttered threats, that "he's dangerous", due to the powerful radar assaults and high levels of sleep deprivation his daily functions are interfered with and he loses his job, his means of subsistence, and after several months of high levels of sleep deprivation and repetitive powerful radar assaults he gets seriously sick .. rampages and rage shootings are interpreted as a "deranged person" without any more information to the public.

SECTION 12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.

The powerful radar assaults attempt to circumvent the Canadian Charter through attempts to overwhelm the finances of an accused who has a right to legal council, which are already overwhelming costs linked to a Fair Trial. Incarceration through the use of organized crime, strategy, intervention, false pretenses, the right to Liberty. The right not to be subjected to any Cruel and Unusual Treatment or Punishment, cancer and hidden homicides through the medical system.

Example 20

Disability, here is a strategy example that involves other previously mentioned examples to attack welfare recipients with a disability and people with a disability income. The police file criminal allegations or fabricate criminal allegations, the accused is overwhelmed by the cost of legal representation and threatened by participating defense lawyers, a smear campaign, his attempts to defend himself are said to be "work", "you are working", a threat to their disability income, their means of subsistence, and linked to a pattern that involves the police and mob, attacking and eliminating the means of subsistence of citizens to make conviction easier and to prevent lawsuits or exposure, the homelessness weapon.

Example 21

Premature aging, "accelerated decrepitude", is linked to inflicting damage to the body while using high levels of sleep deprivation. The body is damaged but does not heal or recover the way it should with regular sleep resulting in premature aging. The mob's "we want him ugly" is linked to the use of premature aging and smear campaigns. The mob is currently using sound technology for high levels of sleep deprivation combined with stressful and physically demanding work or criminal harassment for premature aging. This can be followed by the smear campaign examples given where false allegations are filed of uttering threats, insinuations the accused is dangerous, powerful radar assaults "you have to run", detained or intervention, leading to incarceration, participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists etc.

Note that powerful radar assaults over long and delayed criminal proceedings are also linked to inflicting physical damage, premature aging, and possible deadly cancers.

Example 22

Castration, "need to castrate that bull", the bull refers to someone that protects the "cows" by mobbing participants and the "cows" being citizens. The castration can involve attempts to induce fear, fear linked to honor, and attempts to "castrate" men through fear and humiliation. The castration can also be physical, where powerful radar streams are aimed at the testicles or at the colon, prostate, and testicles area at night during sleep or during the day, leading to testicular damage, infertility, and testicular cancer.

THE TWELFTH STRATEGY
POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS

Example

Following false allegations and charter violation such as entering a home without a warrant and seizing private computers, personal information, citizens are released with assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial. The resulting behavior from radar assaults such as claims of radar assaults, shielding and protection measures, personal hygiene and household that begins to suffer as they try to avoid these, anger and frustration, etc, are all used to justify police and psychiatric intervention leading to incarceration and the assessment order for non-criminal responsibility before trial. Non-criminal responsibility before trial sanctions the criminal allegations and charter violations, entering a home without a warrant, and seizing personal computers, personal information aka the right to privacy. A trial and presentation of charter violations that would stay the proceedings are not needed, the defendant is not guilty of having committed the crime due to mental illness.

Homelessness Example

"every time I step into the house I'm assaulted by powerful radar from neighboring homes" .. "you stay outside" aka homeless.

Smear Campaign Steps or Pattern Example

1. radar assaults
2. criminal allegations (uttering threats)
3. insinuations that accused is dangerous
4. communications interception and surveillance (uttering threats s.183)
5. non-criminal responsibility before trial; "plead non-criminal responsible before trial, it is the same as not guilty" "you have to turn" "you have to run" run away or get cancer, threats of intervention, incarceration,, circumventing the right to a fair trial,, cancer, homelessness.
6. preventing lawsuits

Repression Through Cancer Example

After several months of long and delayed criminal proceedings during which a citizen was assaulted with powerful radar from neighboring homes in attempts to make him aggressive or use a participating neighbor to claim he had uttered threats, the citizen developed a serious illness, cancer.

The Twelfth Strategy Illustration Example

After criminal allegations of uttering threats from criminal harassment participants, the police used this criminal charge to insinuate that I was dangerous and request communications interception and surveillance. Neighbors began to assault me with powerful radar, which resulted in me really uttering threats towards one of them, which is when the police came out of their stakeout, the surveillance, to file a second criminal allegation, which resulted in my incarceration for several months waiting for trial leading to a convictions on both counts of uttering threats.

Motive and Intent: powerful radar to assault a citizen in their own home to push them out of their home, the homelessness weapon; the behavior of victims of powerful radar assault is used to justify intervention, to take control or interfere with an accused's defense, which is linked to unlawful assessment orders before trial; pleading non-criminal responsible would shorten the length of time being assaulted by powerful radar and result in no trial, which would also sanction the false allegations and other Charter violations; money, which is often linked to murder and homicides, victims of malicious allegations and prosecutions may not sue or will not be able to complete their lawsuit due to serious illness, cancer and death; assassination.

Assassination, the death of political opponents, human rights defenders who document workplace psychological harassment and criminal harassment, the use of technology like powerful radar assaults, corporate CEOs of corporations the mob would like to control such as Apple and YouTube for example etc. Different powerful microwave assaults have different effects on the lungs, irritation and damage of the lungs, which is linked and hidden through lung cancer. Others, powerful radar and microwaves damage red blood cells and the bone linked to bone cancer and leukemia, the bone marrow. The police all know these ones, brain and testicular cancer. Powerful radar streams can be aimed at the colon, prostate, and testicular area and can also be aimed at the prostate area to irritate the prostate.

The use of powerful radar assaults has been mentioned several times. Its linked to premature aging and to deadly cancers such as leukemia, lung cancer, and bone cancer. A different form of assassination attempt on a longer term homicide through cancer instead of an immediate short term homicide. It's use is linked to ridicule and denial. To create a vulnerability through serious illness similar to using homeless to create a vulnerability. Serious illness and cancer once incarcerated to make a person suffer, the use of cancer to make a people suffer similar to using homelessness to make a person suffer. The mob's claim of cleaning the police through homelessness and cancer. It is used in smear campaign strategies that deal with incarceration for run aways' or through intervention to make the defendant vulnerable to expensive legal costs and participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists. Powerful radar assaults to discourage and prevent lawsuits that involve malicious allegations and prosecutions. Long and delayed criminal proceedings while the accused is assaulted with powerful radar. It is used to interfere with the daily functions of a defendant and their attempts to defend themselves. These are all linked to the Charter and attempts to circumvent the Charter.

Example 23

The uses sound technology to sleep deprive a citizen over several years as they struggle in their daily functions, work that involves physical activity or workplace psychological harassment to induce high levels of stress on the body, or criminal harassment, without proper recovery. The mob recruits, turns, or moves in participants in the neighborhood to prepare for the criminal allegations that will involve participants and the accused citizen of uttering threats combined with powerful radar assaults over long and delayed criminal proceedings, the radar assaults begin, the threats are uttered, the criminal allegations are filed, insinuations that the accused is dangerous or "deranged", long and delayed criminal proceedings, the accused loses his job, he runs away to avoid a deadly illness, cancer, or the police try to intervene due to the behavior resulting from powerful radar assaults, complaints from neighbors, suspicious vehicles, incarcerated for evaluation, vulnerable to participating defense lawyers and psychiatrists, assessment for non-criminal responsibility before trial .. etc. ..rage shootings, gun control, defenseless population, more abuse?

 

 

LRAD® (Long Range Acoustic Device™), HSS Hypersonic Sound Technology - YouTube (videos)

"What makes the LRAD product unique is its ability to transmit your message with exceptional voice intelligibility and tonal clarity in a highly directional beam, even with significant ambient noise. The directionality of the LRAD device reduces the risk of exposing nearby personnel or peripheral bystanders to harmful audio levels."

 

 

"What makes the LRAD product unique is its ability to transmit your message with exceptional voice intelligibility and tonal clarity in a highly directional beam, even with significant ambient noise. The directionality of the LRAD device reduces the risk of exposing nearby personnel or peripheral bystanders to harmful audio levels."

"Think about the ability to focus sound into a crowd of people on a football field and talk only to a selected few." -- Ultrasound, beyond the hearing level, used to create audible sound

HSS Hypersonic Sound Technology and sound technology like the LRAD system are being used by organized crime to target citizens in there own homes from neighboring homes.

It is used to sleep deprive targeted citizens, and combined with criminal harassment participant in public places who add adrenaline and stress to high levels of sleep deprivation. To destroy a person's health over a long period of time and to eliminate their means of subsistence, if you can't sleep you cannot function. High levels of sleep deprivation prevents healing and recovery, linked to premature aging, and increases the risk of cancer.

During criminal allegations proceedings it is used for criminal harassment, threats, intimidation, and high levels of sleep deprivation before important appearances in court. It is used for provocation combined with police surveillance and communication interception.

This type of technology used to target citizens in their own homes is combined with another technology used to target citizens in their own homes, radiation technology and powerful radar linked to deadly cancers such as lung cancer and leukemia.

HSS Hypersonic Sound

"Elwood "Woody" Norris, founder and Chairman of American Technology Corporation (ATC), announced he had successfully created a device which achieved ultrasound transmission of sound in 1996.[5] ATC named and trademarked their device as "HyperSonic Sound" (HSS). In February 1998, HSS was named the Best of What's New for 1997 by readers of Popular Science.[6] In December 2002, Popular Science named HyperSonic Sound the best invention of 2002.[citation needed] Norris received the 2005 Lemelson-MIT Prize for his invention of a "hypersonic sound".[7] ATC (now named LRAD Corporation) spun off the technology to Parametric Sound Corporation in September 2010 to focus on their Long Range Acoustic Device products (LRAD), according to their quarterly reports, press releases and executive statements.[8][9]"

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-814622

 

Effects and Use of Focused Ultrasound Weapon

Focused ultrasound can be used to to inflict physical damage, lesions aka brain lesions, and can affect the equilibrium causing disorientation and dizziness.


"Robinson Crusoe" A Canadian Murder Through Cancer Practice - (news flash)

The Canadian Criminal Judicial System, Lower Court Judges, Police, and "Secret Police" are linked to assaulting targeted citizens with radiation technology and powerful radar, which are linked to deadly cancers, lung cancer and leukemia, over long and delayed judicial proceedings. Some lawyers seem to know this practice, aware of it, and call this a "Robinson Crusoe". Why, I don't really understand, something about long proceedings, lawsuits, and cancer. (SHORT ASSASSINATION STRATEGY SUMMARY)

Radiation Technology and Powerful Radar Assaults

The Canadian Police, "Secret Police", and mob are linked to a criminal harassment network that uses sound technology like HSS Hypersonic Sound and the LRAD system in public places and from neighboring homes, to sleep deprive targeted victims "if you can't sleep you cannot function".

Radiation technology and powerful radar assaults are used in a similar way, in public places, the court house, and from neighboring homes, which makes it impossible to function safely, especially during long and delayed criminal proceedings or the following lawsuits to recover the financial loss from false or malicious allegations.

Short Assassination Strategy Summary

Powerful radar is used to assault citizens in their own homes and in public places in the shin area over a long period of time, long criminal proceedings or civil lawsuits for example, in attempts to damage the bone marrow, which is linked to leukemia. Another area targeted are the lungs, radiation technology is aimed at the lungs to irritate them, to inflame them and to scare them, which can lead to deadly lung cancer. Criminal harassment participants use words like "you have to turn over". Another area targeted, which is also linked to degrading themes, are the testicle, prostate, and colon area.

This method of assassination is different from using polonium radioactive material and leaves less evidence, the radioactive material.

Non-Criminal Responsibility Before Trial

Assessment orders for non-criminal responsibility before trial put defendants on the defensive and prevent claims of these radiation technology assaults. Any claims and protection measures are linked to threats of police intervention, which leads to incarceration at a prison psychiatric institute during the criminal proceedings and can be used to justify non-criminal responsibility, which sanctions the criminal allegations, any charter violations, and circumvents the right to a trial.

 

Journal Entry July 20th, 2012 2:50 am

I was assaulted a lot by powerful radar today, I think they are retaliating because of the recent Marc Lepine article "Did Someone Else Write Marc Lepine's Suicide Note and Use a Stereotype, An Arab Father? - CNN iReport".

I have a protective enclosure made of iron, lead, graphite/carbon tiles, and aluminum conductor but at around 2:30 am it felt as if someone passed by between our home and that of our neighbor at close proximity with a radar ground penetrating antenna aimed at my enclosure. The Police and Secret Police are linked to the use of these technologies to assault citizens in their own homes linked to deadly cancers, leukemia and lung cancer.

 

 

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT, POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS, REQUEST OF ASYLUM, CRIMINAL ALLEGATION OF UTTERING THREATS TOWARDS WOMEN IN A MOBBING RESEARCH ARTICLE

Complaints against the Police before the assaults began, complaints to the Quebec Human Rights Commission, the start of powerful radar assaults, requests for asylum from these assaults to foreign countries, and criminal allegations that Danny Hunt uttered threats towards women in a Mobbing Research article that was published on CNN iReport.

A complaint that started with the RCMP in regards to Dave Dumont a former RCMP member, referred to file a complaint to Laval Police debt., they refuse the complaint, other complaints to Ministers regarding Stephan Hardy ceasing to exist according to the Surete du Quebec. ..

 

My Journal - Complaint against Quebec Human Rights Commission: Restriction of Police Services
December 6, 2010
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-526202

Complaint against Quebec Human Rights Commission: Restriction of Police Services

I believe the Quebec Human Rights Commission in Canada actions are a violation of the human rights treaty.

The Quebec Human Rights Commission in Canada dismisses complaints linked to the restriction of Police services and protection, the restriction of Police services and protection being linked to criminal complaints that involve other law enforcement members.

The restriction of Police services and protection combined with the Quebec Human Rights Commission action of dismissing complaints related to this restriction can be linked to corruption.

1) Law enforcement organizations and members who refuse to accept criminal complaints that involve other law enforcement members.

a) Criminal complaint against Dave Dumont a former RCMP member in July 2009.

- The RCMP claim that they do not know Dave Dumont or he has ceased to exist leading to a criminal complaint at the local Laval Police.
- The criminal complaint against Dave Dumont a former RCMP member consists of a crime committed against me when I was a minor, conspiracy against a minor.
- Request that I speak to a social worker with links to psychiatry.

b) Criminal complaint against a person calling and impersonating an RCMP member.

- Some one called and identified himself to my father as an RCMP member from Edmonton.
- Used psychiatry as a threat insinuating that my “behavior was not normal” and asked “could he kill a person”.
- RCMP have no knowledge of who called and a complaint led to the conclusion that no RCMP members were responsible for this call.

- Complaint to the local Laval Police dept. for someone impersonating an RCMP member.
- Request that I speak to a social worker with links to psychiatry.

2) Complaint to the Quebec Police deontology for refusing criminal complaints without a valid reason and requesting that I speak to a social worker, restricting my access to Police services and protection.

- Restricting access to Police services and protection linked to human rights violation.
- Complaint dismissed by Police Quebec deontology.

3) Call to Quebec Human Rights Commission.

- No human rights violation according to Quebec human rights commission.
- Suggest contacting Laval Police dept. again, which can lead to charges of criminal mischief.

4) Observed experience in Police behavior and actions when other law enforcement members are involved in a criminal complaint.

a) Charges of criminal mischief.

- In 2004 I was charged with criminal mischief by the SQ due to the disappearance of Stephan Hardy and linked to the criminal complaint against Dave Dumont in 2009.
- Dave Dumont has also disappeared according to the RCMP.

b) The use of social workers and psychiatry.

- The criminal complaint against Dave Dumont in 2009.
- The criminal complaint against a person impersonating an RCMP member.

Conclusion:

Law enforcement organizations and members refuse criminal complaints that involve other law enforcement members and two procedures can be involved:

- Request to speak to social workers with links to psychiatry.
- Charges of criminal mischief.

The Quebec Human Rights Commission dismisses complaints of human rights violations linked to the restriction of Police services and protection, and suggest pursuing with contacts with these law enforcement organizations which can result in charges of criminal mischief.

- Restrictions or criminal mischief charges.
- Dismissal of human rights violations linked to restrictions.
- Continued restrictions or criminal mischief charges.

 

My Journal - Request for assistance from the Quebec Provincial Police, Surete du Quebec.
December 20, 2010
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-531061

This is a recent request that I have sent to the Quebec Surete du Quebec for assisstance.

Surete du Quebec

Request for assistance from the Quebec Provincial Police, Surete du Quebec.

I document workplace psychological harassment and criminal psychological harassment and I am currently under microwave attack, some type of microwave or radar.

The criminal network that I document has referred to this as "being under the radar" and linked it to different views on reality towards law enforcement.

This microwave attack is linked to a pattern and series of steps that I have documented linked to organized crime, assassination through cancer, and homelessness.

It is referred to as mobbing in modern society on my website.

Psychological Harassment Information Association
www.psychologicalharassment.org

This attack comes at a time when I am currently taking different actions with documents towards the minister of public safety.

The local Laval Police dept. does not accept other criminal complaints that I have filed with links to request for me to speak to a social worker or possible charges of criminal mischief if I persist, and this is linked to the actions I'm currently take with the Minister of public safety and my elected deputy of Parliament Guy Ouellette.

Request for assistance or information in dealing with this microwave technology attack and what I consider to be an assassination attempt linked to cancer and leukemia.

Sincerely,
Danny Hunt

1870 Robinson apt. 301
Laval QC H7T 1L6

514-560-4319

This is the ireport and video related to this issue:

Mobbing in Modern Society: My Apartment Following Microwave Attacks
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-530722

The need to recognize Workplace Psychological Harassment used to eliminate a person's means of subsistence. (step 1)

The need to recognize technology used by organized crime linked to criminal harassment:

- Sound technology used for criminal harassment and sleep deprivation.(step 3)

- Microwave technology used for intimidation and assassination through cancer, leukemia.(step 5)

 

Request of Asylum linked to Microwave (radar) Attacks and Assassination Attempts in Quebec Canada
December 23, 2010
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-532203

Dear Prime Minister Stephen Harper

This is to inform you that I will be requesting asylum in the U.K. or France.

I’m experiencing something similar to Randy Quaid and what I believe to be a pattern or series of steps linked to homelessness and cancer.

I have tried to address the issue with Ministers and my elected member of parliament but this has not proven successful. I am currently taking large doses of microwaves (radar) linked to homelessness out of fear and cancer. This has made attempts to continue to address the issues and the delays involved difficult and very hazardous to my health.

Sincerely,
Danny Hunt

Psychological Harassment Information Association
www.psychologicalharassment.org

Criminal Allegations of "Uttering Threats towards women" in a Mobbing Research article February 21, 2011

..

LONG ARTICLE WITH OHCHR REPLY

Danny Hunt my Human Rights Violations complaints to OHCHR - CNN iReport
April 25, 2011
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-596106

Danny Hunt: Canada for Violation of Human Rights Treaties; Discrimination, Responses - CNN iReports (video link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-595997

TB-petitions OHCHR <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. >
to Danny Hunt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. >
date Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:34 AM
subject Re: OHCHR Complaint against Canada for Violation of Human Rights Treaties: Discrimination and Rights of a Disabled Person
hide details Apr 18 (7 days ago)

Dear Mr. Hunt,

After careful consideration of the contents of your communication dated 17 April 2011, we sincerely regret having to inform you that the Petitions Unit of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is still not in a position to assist you in the matter you raise, for the following reasons:

Domestic judicial/administrative remedies in Canada do not appear to have been exhausted, and it has not been substantiated that the application of domestic remedies would be unreasonably prolonged or that the remedies would be otherwise unavailable or ineffective. Under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an individual is required to exhaust all available domestic remedies at the national level prior to submitting an individual communication to the Human Rights Committee. This requirement applies to each allegation of a violation of a right provided for in the Covenant, which should be raised and challenged before the domestic courts.

Furthermore, your communication does not provide sufficient details as to how your rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights have been violated.

Please accept our apologies for not replying in a more personal manner. You may understand that, while we appreciate your reasons for writing to us, the existing procedures require that it is ascertained whether certain preliminary criteria are satisfied before proceeding with the examination of a petition.

For information about the procedures for the examination of individual petitions on human rights violations, please consult our website: www.ohchr.org, direct link: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/petitions/index.htm. If you have difficulty accessing our website, please write to the UNHCHR, Information Office PW-RS-011, 1211 Geneva 10, and ask for Human Rights Fact Sheets Nos. 7, 12, 15 and 17.

Yours sincerely,

A staff member of the Petitions Unit

Danny Hunt: Canada for Violation of Human Rights Treaties; Discrimination, Responses - CNN iReports (video link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-595997

Danny Hunt <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. >
to TB-petitions OHCHR <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. >
date Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM
subject Re: OHCHR Complaint against Canada for Violation of Human Rights Treaties: Discrimination and Rights of a Disabled Person
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 1:25 AM (33 minutes ago)
Dear OHCHR,

"A) Domestic judicial/administrative remedies in Canada do not appear to have been exhausted,"

1. I've attempted to address this issues with Canadian Ministers and the Province of Quebec Ministers through letters and phone calls, none have responded;

2. 2010, December, 1, Ministre et Ministere de la Justice et Security Publique Complaint_cmp.pdf;

3. I've attempted to address the issue with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Quebec Human Rights Commission;

4. The mandate falls under the Quebec Human Rights Commission, as indicated they dismissed the issue and complaint and advised me to persist with the Laval Police;

5. From personal experience of 2004, when you persist it results in a charge of criminal mischief;

6. And I did get the strong impression the Laval Police wanted to proceed like the Surete du Quebec in 2004 by charging me with criminal mischief;

7. Attempts to address a complaint towards the Quebec Human Rights Commission falls under the responsibility of my elected member of Parliament Guy Oulette;

8. 2010, December, 6, Complaint Against the Quebec Human Rights Commission_cmp.pdf;

9. I have attempted to address the issue with my elected member of parliament Guy Oulette through email and through phone calls, he has not responded;

10. Addressing the issue and complaint with my elected member of parliament was the last step in attempts to address the issue before filing a complaint for violation of International treaties;

During this Waiting Period of Time

11. On February 21, 2011 I was arrested and charged with uttering threats towards women on facebook linked to a Mobbing Research article;

12. 2011, February, 21, Laval Prosecutors Proof Criminal Allegations.pdf_cmp.pdf;

13. Attempts were made to keep me incarcerated for several months through these false allegations and a vulnerability, my psychiatric care history and disability;

Information on Exhausting all Domestic Judicial/Administrative Remedies in Canada

14. I have exhausted all domestic judicial/administrative remedies in Canada according to the information that I have been provided by the Canadian Government;

15. The information provided by the Canadian government concerning the exhausted judicial/administrative remedies are on audio recordings and so are my dealings with the Quebec Human Rights Commission.

Furthermore

16. Furthermore, I would like to inform you that since September 2010 I am attacked through organzed crime and powerful radar technology;

17. The powerful radar technology is linked to radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia;

18. I believe the delays are linked to prolonged exposure to powerful radar in attempts to make me seriously ill, leukemia, and vulnerable to the medical community, a strategy;

19. I believe the delays are linked to these more recent false allegations, which are also linked to prolonged exposure to powerful radar and a possible criminal record if I had been unable to defend me self;

20. I believe that both serious illness or leukemia and a criminal record are used in attempts to trap me were I am currently attacked through organized crime, in Canada;

21. Similar to how homelessness in a modern country can trap a person being attacked by organized crime.

"B) Furthermore, your communication does not provide sufficient details as to how your rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights have been violated."

The right to non-discrimination and the rights of a disabled person;

A vulnerability, Danny Hunt's disability has been exploited several times by the Surete du Quebec and Laval Police, abusive discrimination towards a person with a disability;

A)

1. Danny Hunt was led to believe that he had caused the death of Celine Hardy by a criminal harassment network;

2. Law enforcement organizations deny the existence of a criminal harassment networks;

3. Danny Hunt was charged with criminal mischief in 2003 by the Surete du Quebec when he reported his belief;

4. The Surete du Quebec were informed before the criminal charge of his disability, a psychiatric care history;

5. The charge of criminal mischief in 2003 is linked to claiming that a criminal harassment network does not exist and abusive discrimination towards a person with a disability;

6. 2003, November, 26, and 2004, May, 13, SQ Criminal Mischief Accusations_cmp.pdf

B)

1. Two different complaints, one that is linked to the charges of 2003, that involved other law enforcement members were refused through Danny Hunt's disability by referring him to psycho-social, social workers with links to psychiatry;

2. 2009, July, 20, Danny Hunt Criminal Complaint Conspiracy Against Minor PDQ 5_cmp.pdf

3. 2009, December, 16, Criminal Complaint Impersonater RCMP Laval Police PDQ3_cmp.pdf

4. Which is linked to a form of restriction of Police services and protection, and abusive discrimination towards a person with a disability;

1. Danny Hunt is the founder and creator of Psychological Harassment Information Association www.psychologicalharassment.org that aims to prevent workplace psychological harassment and other related issues such as discrimination, sexual harassment, and workplace violence such as rage shootings;

2. In the past Danny Hunt had distributed information documents to the Laval Police and discussed the issue, so they knew who Danny Hunt was and were familiar with his website;

3. A Police procedure is used to send victims who claim to be victims of a criminal harassment network to psychiatry, confirmed by a Laval Police member in 2009;

C)

4. On February 21 2011 Danny Hunt was charged with "uttering threats towards women on facebook" through a Mobbing Research article, a CNN iReport;

5. In the prosecutors proof file that is given to him by the Laval Police, it is noted in several places that Danny Hunt has a psychiatric care history;

6. The Mobbing Research article in question is also in this file;

7. Which makes it obvious that the Laval Police had the whole research article in question and not just the paragraph, a parody to illustrate an idea, that was used to file criminal allegations;

8. The justification for requesting Danny Hunt remain incarcerated for 30 days in prison for a psychiatric evaluation are as follows;

- no criminal record, in 2003 Danny Hunt reported believing having caused the death of a girl, Danny Hunt has a psychiatric care history;

9. The determining factors for requesting that Danny Hunt remain incarcerated for another 30 days seem to be that he was led to believe by a criminal harassment network that the Laval Police denies exists, and his disability, a psychiatric care history;

10. Which is linked to abusive discrimination towards a person with a disability;

Furthermore, the abuse towards a person with a disability could have been increased by hostile prison psychiatric members who could attempt to give support to criminal allegations by claiming Danny Hunt was dangerous, which would result in him being incarcerated and unable to defend him self as he did until his trial for several months;

D)

1. Danny Hunt believes the radar attacks since September 2010 are an assassination attempt linked to crimes committed against him by the Surete du Quebec and RCMP as indicated in the criminal complaint that was refused by the Laval Police on July 20, 2009 and the Laval Police through participation;

2. And another possibly motive is the website that he created that documents workplace psychological harassment, mobbing, and criminal harassment networks that are said not to exist by these Police organization so that it can be erased and destroyed;

Attempts to create a vulnerability through sickness and cancer towards the medical community similar to the vulnerability of having a psychiatric disability that has been exploited in the past, abusive discrimination towards a person with a disability;

Serious Human Rights Violations, Assassination Method linked to Cancer

Danny Hunt would like to mention that following the events of 2003 and 2009 that involve the Surete du Quebec and the Laval Police he believes he was the victim of an assassination method that involves placing portable x-ray units under a person's apartment sleeping area wooden floor in the apartment below for a period of time, followed by blasting the victim to homelessness with powerful radar, which is linked to different cancers such as leukemia and lung cancer;

Followed by the criminal allegations of 2011 and attempts to incarcerate him for a long period of time while awaiting trial.

Sincerely,
Danny Hunt

Danny Hunt: Complaint against Canada for Violation of Human Rights Treaties; Discrimination, Rights - CNN iReports (video link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-593283

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Danny Hunt would like to submit a complaint against Canada for violation of human rights treaties;

Procedure under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;

The right to non-discrimination and the rights of a disabled person;

Special circumstances of urgency;

OHCHR Contact Information:

Petitions Team
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations Office at Geneva
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
ž
Fax + 41 22 9179022 (particularly for urgent matters)
@
E-mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Human Rights Council and Treaties Division
Complaint Procedure
OHCHR-UNOG
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Danny Hunt Contact Information:

Danny Hunt

age: 42
date of birth:
gender: male

Home Address:

1870 Robinson apt. 301
Laval Quebec Canada
H7T 1L6

Mailing Address:

845 Cure-Labelle, box 200
Laval Quebec Canada
H7V 2V2

phone: 514-560-4319

The Complaint:

The human rights treaty violation that Danny Hunt wishes to address concerns;

A police organization refusing to accept criminal complaints because they involve other law enforcement members and using a medical disability, a psychiatric care history, as justification for refusing criminal complaints, which is discrimination;

The Quebec Human Rights Commission has failed to address the issue in a proper manner and advises to persist with the Laval Police dept., which from his personal experience with the Surete du Quebec in 2004 results in charges of criminal mischief;

The Quebec Public Safety Minister has not responded to the issue or responded in a timely manner;

The Quebec Human Rights Commission’s failure to address the issue and the Ministers failure to respond results in a violation of human rights treaties by Canada;

Special Circumstances of Urgency:

Since September 2010 to this date of April 17, 2011 Danny Hunt has been targeted by powerful radar technology, which is linked to radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia;

The Public Safety Minister of Canada and Quebec, including law enforcement organizations have not responded or deny the claim and complaint that organized crime is using powerful radar technology linked to cancer and leukemia;

This is mentioned in a separate Human Rights Defender complaint;

"For the Human Rights Committee, situations of urgency requiring immediate action fall under rule 86 of its rules of procedure. In such cases, the Committee's Special Rapporteur on New Communications may issue a request to the State party for interim measures with a view to averting irreparable harm before your complaint is considered. The Committee views compliance with such a request as inherent in a State party's obligations under the Optional Protocol and any failure to comply as a breach thereof."

The Complaint Issues:

1. Refusing criminal complaints because they involve other law enforcement members and using a disability as justification, which is discrimination;

2. The Quebec Human Rights Commission has dismissed the complaint and issue and advises Danny Hunt to persist with the police, which through personal experience of 2004 can result in a charge of criminal mischief;

3. The Quebec Minister has not responded to attempts to address this issue of refusing criminal complaints that involve other law enforcement members and using a disability as a justification;

4. Since September 2010 Danny Hunt is attacked through powerful radar microwave technology linked to radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia, which is used to push him out of his apartment;

5. False allegations on February 21, 2011 that he “uttered threats on facebook towards women” linked to a Mobbing Research article;

6. Using a disability, a psychiatric care history after a false allegation in attempts to incarcerate a person, Danny Hunt, for a long period of time under psychiatric evaluation, which may also permit hostile prison psychiatric members to build a file to give support to false allegations or keep him incarcerated while awaiting trial;

Example, no psychiatric medical member has ever claimed that Danny Hunt was dangerous and a hostile psychiatrist member could suddenly claim that he is dangerous to keep him incarcerated while awaiting trial and to give support to false allegations;

7. A police procedure exists that sends all people who claim to be victims of a criminal harassment network to psychiatry, confirmed by a Laval Police member in 2009;

Chronology Short:

1.

2003, November, 26, and 2004, May, 13; Danny Hunt was led to the conclusion that he had caused the death of Celine Hardy, the twin sister of Stephan Hardy, by a criminal harassment network and reported this fact to the Surete du Quebec, Celine Hardy was found alive and Stephan Hardy ceased to exist, and he was charged with criminal mischief in-spite of the fact that the Surete du Quebec Homicide Detective Manon Descoteaux knew that he was under the care of a psychiatrist Dr. Rene Acade;

Danny Hunt found himself in a position of having to prove that he had caused the death of Celine Hardy, that she was in fact deceased, in order to be found not guilty of criminal mischief, which would result in a criminal record;

2.

2009, July, 20; Danny Hunt filed a criminal complaint with the Laval Police dept. PDQ 5 against Dave Dumont a former RCMP member for conspiring against him when he was a minor, at around 1985;

The complaint was refused and he was asked to speak to a social worker with psycho-social, with links to psychiatry, Martin Metivier;

Danny Hunt spoke to Martin Metivier and tells him about his website and the documentation that he provided to the Laval Police dept.;

Psychological Harassment Information Association www.psychologicalharassment.org

3.

2009, February, 9; Someone identifying himself as a member of the RCMP from Edmonton Alberta Canada called and spoke to Thomas Hunt, Danny Hunt’s father, and stated the following; “is he dangerous” “could he kill a person” “his behavior is not normal”;

2009, December, 16; Danny Hunt was told he could not submit a criminal complaint for someone calling his home and impersonating an RCMP officer until he spoke to Martin Metivier of Psyco-Social, a social worker with links to psychiatry by Sgt. Vanelli and two other members of the Laval Police dept., Agent Tardif and Valesquez or Avalez, at Laval Police PDQ 3;

Sgt. Vanelli stated to agent Tardif and Avalez “it’s because he is new”;

2010, January, 5; Danny Hunt filed a complaint with the Quebec Police Ethics Commissioner against the Laval Police Sgt. Vanelli or Fanelli for refusing to accept his criminal complaint because it involved other law enforcement members and for requesting that he speak to a social worker with links to psychiatry;

Quebec Police Ethics Complaint 10-0010;

2010; The Quebec Human Rights Commission’s fails to address this issue, dismisses the complaint linked to discrimination, and advises Danny Hunt to persist with the Laval Police;

Chronology Long:

2003, November, 26, and 2004, May, 13; Danny Hunt was charged with criminal mischief even if the Surete du Quebec knew that he had a medical disability or a psychiatric care history;

- Danny Hunt was led to believe that he caused the death of Celine Hardy by a criminal harassment network;

- An event that happened when he was a minor around 1985;

- Danny Hunt was charge with criminal mischief because he persisted with the Surete du Quebec in the belief that he had caused the death of Celine Hardy the twin sister of Stephan Hardy, and that Stephan Hardy existed; Stephan Hardy ceased to exist according to the Surete du Quebec, which is what resulted in the persistence and a charge of criminal mischief;

2009, July, 20; A complaint of conspiring against Danny Hunt when he was a minor by a former RCMP member Dave Dumont, who would know who the Surete du Quebec officer was in the event of 1985 was refused;

- First police complaint refused, asked to speak to a social worker with links to psychiatry, psycho-social;

- In 2009 a police member confirmed that all people who claimed to be victims of a criminal harassment network are sent to psychiatry;

2009, December, 16; A complaint against someone calling Danny Hunt’s home and impersonating an RCMP member was refused;

- Second police complaint refused, asked to speak to a social worker with links to psychiatry, psycho-social;

2010, September, --; Danny Hunt was attacked through powerful radar technology linked to radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia;

- Attacked through powerful radar technology during the period of time he tried to address these issue, resulting in delays, and ongoing to this date;

2010, December, 1; Complaint to Minister of Public Safety regarding complaints being refused by the Laval Police dept., Stephan Hardy ceasing to exist, powerful radar attacks, and other issues;

2010, December, 6; Complaint to his elected member of Parliament Guy Oulette regarding the Quebec Human Rights Commission’s dismissal of his complaint regarding the police refusing criminal complaints because it involves other police members, the restriction of police services and protection, and discrimination or the use of a disability to justify requesting he speak to a social workers with links to psychiatry; Laval psycho-social;

The Quebec Human Rights Commission dismissed the complaints of human rights violations linked to discrimination and advises Danny Hunt in pursuing and contacting this law enforcement organization;

From experience Danny Hunt has witnessed two reactions when criminal complaints involve other law enforcement members; 1. charges of criminal mischief, 2. demands that he speak with social workers with links to psychiatry;

2010, December, 26; Danny Hunt sent a complaint to the Regie du Logement and Protecteur du Citoyen in Quebec;

CNN iReports http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-533111

Same complaint that was sent to the Surete du Quebec below [];

2010, December, 31; I sent a complaint to the Surete du Quebec

CNN iReports http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-535299

[“Since the month of September I am targeted by powerful microwaves (radar) at my apartment at 1870 Robinson apt. 301 H7T 1L6 in Laval QC.

1) I do not have access to the protection and services of the Laval Police given the fact that they do not accept any criminal complaints from me.

2) Another problem is that I was informed by a member of the Laval Police dept. that they refer any complaints of this type of criminal harassment by using a procedure of sending clients to social workers, psycho-social, or psychiatry.

--

What recourse do I have to address this issue.”]

Important Note; Online complaints to the Surete du Quebec concerning radar attacks; The Surete du Quebec refer Danny Hunt back to the Laval Police dept., The Laval Police dept. have already refused other criminal complaints and keep referring Danny Hunt to psycho-social, psychiatry; The Quebec Human Rights Commission advises to persist with the Laval Police dept., which can result in charges of criminal mischief;

2011, February, 21; One after placing an add to rent his apartment on February 20, 2011, Danny Hunt was charged with allegations that he “uttered threats on facebook towards women” linked to a Mobbing Research article aimed at preventing rage shootings;

- Danny Hunt’s medical disability, a vulnerability, was used again in attempts to incarcerate him for 30 days under prison psychiatric evaluation;

- 30 days that can be extended if a hostile prison psychiatric member suddenly claims that he is dangerous and while awaiting trial, which is several months;

- Attacked through radar while he needed to write motions to defend himself from allegations with a stationary desktop computer, his new laptop and older desktop were seized without warrant;

- Delays in addressing the Human Rights issue at the International level as he intended to do several months ago and possible fatal impact on his health in the near future;

Notes:

A medical disability, a vulnerability, has been exploited or abused by the Laval Police dept.;

Which is linked to discrimination towards a person with a disability and the rights of a disabled person;

1. A medical disability is used to justify refusing criminal complaints, which is discrimination;

2. To refuse criminal complaints that involve other law enforcement members;

Dave Dumont a former RCMP member for conspiracy against a minor; Laval PDQ 5;

A person impersonating an RCMP officer who also attempted to use this vulnerability by asking his father "is he dangerous" "could he kill a person" "his behaviour is not normal" 10-0010; Laval PDQ 3;

3. In attempts to incarcerate Danny Hunt for a longer period of time through a Laval Police demand that he remain in prison under psychiatric evaluation, which would have made him vulnerable to hostile prison psychiatrists that would try to support false criminal allegations;

4. Attacked through powerful radar technologies starting September 2010 after his medical disability, a psychiatric care history, was already used to refuse criminal complaints and requests that he contact someone at psycho-social linked to psychiatry;

5. The Surete du Quebec do not respond to the issue of radar attacks and simply refer Danny Hunt back to the Laval Police dept.;

6. The Quebec Ministers do not respond to the issue of powerful radar being used to attack Danny Hunt.

7. The powerful radar attacks are linked to organized crime, subjugation, murder, law enforcement, and different views on reality “turn” and “turn over”; Radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia;

A pattern linked to radar technology, cancer, and homelessness;

Last Note:

Danny Hunt is the founder and creator of the world leading web site Psychological Harassment Information Association since 2003;

As already mentioned in a Human Rights Defender complaint of April 16, 2011;

Human Rights Defender Information:

Creator and founder of the world leading website on psychological harassment since 2003;

Note that the following are different hosting providers and servers;

Psychological Harassment Information Association

www.psychologicalharassment.org
www.psychologicalharassment.eu
www.psychologicalharassment.ca
www.psychologicalharassment.us
www.psychologicalharassment.com (html version)

Which involves workplace psychological harassment, workplace violence, bullying, mobbing, discrimination, sexual harassment, medical knowledge used to harm or torture people, and other related issues;

The website provides information, knowledge, and documentation to help victims of these, to help them under the issue, and provides the knowledge and tools for victims to defend themselves;

Workplace psychological harassment is also linked to violence and rage shootings, and homelessness or using homelessness as a weapon.

Sincerely,

Danny Hunt

Signed on April 17, 2011
Danny Hunt: Complaint by a Human Rights Defender in Canada [facebook discussions] - CNN iReports (video link)
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-592882

Danny Hunt: Complaint by a Human Rights Defender in Canada

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ,
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

date Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:39 PM
subject Complaint by a Human Rights Defender in Canada (2 files)

mailed-by gmail.com
hide details Apr 16 (1 day ago)

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

I would like to use a special procedures thematic to submit a complaint against Canada.

Note that I will be filling a complaint through other human rights complaint mechanism linked to a related issue of discrimination and violation of International treaties by Canada.

Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council

Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders

Special Procedures Details and Contacts:

- To submit an allegation of a violation against a human rights defender: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. +41(0) 22.917.90.06
- To contact the mandate holder for other purposes: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. +41(0) 22.917.90.06

Human Rights Defender Contact Information:

Danny Hunt

age: 42
date of birth:
gender: male

Home:

1870 Robinson apt. 301
Laval Quebec Canada
H7T 1L6

Mailing Address:

845 Cure-Labelle, box 200
Laval Quebec Canada
H7V 2V2

phone: 514-560-4319

Human Rights Defender Information:

Creator and founder of the world leading website on psychological harassment since 2003;

Psychological Harassment Information Association

www.psychologicalharassment.org
www.psychologicalharassment.eu
www.psychologicalharassment.ca
www.psychologicalharassment.us
www.psychologicalharassment.com (html version)

Which involves workplace psychological harassment, workplace violence, bullying, mobbing, discrimination, sexual harassment, medical knowledge used to harm or torture people, and other related issues;

The website provides information, knowledge, and documentation to help victims of these, to help them under the issue, and provide the knowledge and tools to defend themselves;

Workplace psychological harassment is also linked to violence and rage shootings, and homelessness or using homelessness as a weapon;

The Complaint by the Human Rights Defender:

1. Powerful Radar Attacks:

Starting September 2010 Danny Hunt is attacked through powerful radar technology, which is linked to;

- Radiation sensitive cancers and leukemia;
- Organized crime and intimidation;
- A form of assassination or murder;
- To push him out of his apartment, which is linked to homelessness and isolation;
- Increased expenses;
- Preventing research;
- These powerful radar technology attacks persist to this date of April 16, 2011;

2. Arrested and Incarcerated for a Mobbing Research article

On February 21, 2011 Danny hunt was arrested and charged with uttering threats towards women on facebook linked to a Mobbing Research article that aims to prevent rage shooting and rampages;

That follows the work of psychiatrist Marie-France Hirigoyne, a famous author on emotional abuse who in 2000 started a dabate in France which resulted in a law;

A paragraph from the article was used to file the criminal allegations by the Laval police dept.;

A paragraph that was used in the article by the author Danny Hunt to illustrate an idea, a parody, that Marc Lepine may not have written his suicide note, as indicated in the Research Note, and that he seemed to believe that rage shooting and suicides are linked to a person losing their means of subsistence, such as through workplace psychological harassment;

He is incarcerated for 2 days and attempts are made to keep him in prison for 30 more days under psychiatric evaluation, which would make him vulnerable to hostile prison psychiatrist;

Hostile prison psychiatric members who could try to create a file to support criminal allegations, to claim that he is dangerous, and keep him incarcerated over a longer period of time while awaiting trial, which is several months;

His new laptop and a desktop computer were seized without warrant, which resulted in him having access only to one computer to write legal motions to defend himself in court that was targeted by powerful radar technology;

After taking into account the article and video in question that Danny Hunt provided to support his first court motion, the Laval Police detective introduced a motion of firearms restrictions that were already included in his conditions for liberation, before the trial date, that if accepted could give a form of validation to false allegations or insinuatons that he is dangerous;

The Article:

Mobbing Research : Marc Lepine and Rage shooting and Rampages [facebook]
February 21, 2011
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-559620

Mobbing Research: Rage shooting and Rampages [hitting back, Marc Lepine

The voices are using female voices to try to dominate and subjugate me;

Dear Police,

I write this suicide note so that you won't have too, I just want everyone to know that If I commit suicide today or go on a rampage it's not because my means of subsistence have been eliminated and drained by the mob who try to pass themselves off as our society, .... it's because I hate women now ..

------

What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause.

---------------------------------------------

Mobbing Research: Rage shooting and Rampages [hitting back, Marc Lepine]

Hitting Back:

- A man blows up an FBI building.
- A man fly's a plane into a government building.
- A man shoots 4 RCMP members.
- A homeless man snowplows a member of the police force.
- A man shoots a member of government.
- A man shoots 9 people at his workplace.
- A man shoots several women at a university.
- The columbine massacre.

I believe that many of these events are linked to workplace psychological harassment, bullying, and criminal harassment or mobbing networks that try to bankrupt or push victims to homelessness, and use sound and microwave technology linked to criminal harassment, intimidation, and cancer.

The sound technology is linked to sleep deprivation, criminal harassment, psychological manipulation, ideation and creating false views on reality through the use of voices, which are linked to hitting back.

The possibility linked to the man who shot several women at a University may not be obvious unless you experience sound technology and psychological manipulation, which is very often linked to honor and humiliation, so imagine the voices of women used for criminal harassment and sleep deprivation or toture with a view on reality that these women are trying to subjugate, enslave, or dominate this person leading to this person hitting back. (Mark Lepine)

The resulting deaths are than used by these same criminal harassment or mobbing networks to advocate gun control, which makes our population more vulnerable to organized crime (them) and subjugation.

Visible and Warning Signs:

Possible visible signs linked to the use of technology are that victims try to escape these technologies by sleeping somewhere else, which is also linked to homelessness, and I believe Jared Loughner exhibited these signs or pattern.

Last Note:

I have been watching the news for several years and it has become more obvious to me the attempts to suppress these events possible links to bullying and workplace psychological harassment.

The events linked to criminal harassment or mobbing networks are not as obvious but also becoming more visible.

Suicide Letter by Mark Lepine:

"Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons."

What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause.

And eliminating a person's money and pushing a person to homelessness is one of the main objectives by criminal harassment or mobbing networks, the mob.

Research note, was this a typed or hand written letter?

---------------------------------------------

And I'm not refusing jobs because of workplace psychological harassment linked to degrading themes, humiliation, high levels of stress, and a macromineral depletion strategy with very negative effects on my health and psychological state.

The Previous Article without the Parody:

Mobbing Research: Rage shooting and Rampages [hitting back, marc lepine]
February 13, 2011
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-555164

Hitting Back:

- A man blows up an FBI building.
- A man fly's a plane into a government building.
- A man shoots 4 RCMP members.
- A homeless man snowplows a member of the police force.
- A man shoots a member of government.
- A man shoots 9 people at his workplace.
- A man shoots several women at a university.
- The columbine massacre.

I believe that many of these events are linked to workplace psychological harassment, bullying, and criminal harassment or mobbing networks that try to bankrupt or push victims to homelessness, and use sound and microwave technology linked to criminal harassment, intimidation, and cancer.

The sound technology is linked to sleep deprivation, criminal harassment, psychological manipulation, ideation and creating false views on reality through the use of voices, which are linked to hitting back.

The possibility linked to the man who shot several women at a University may not be obvious unless you experience sound technology and psychological manipulation, which is very often linked to honor and humiliation, so imagine the voices of women used for criminal harassment and sleep deprivation or toture with a view on reality that these women are trying to subjugate, enslave, or dominate this person leading to this person hitting back. (Mark Lepine)

The resulting deaths are than used by these same criminal harassment or mobbing networks to advocate gun control, which makes our population more vulnerable to organized crime (them) and subjugation.

Visible and Warning Signs:

Possible visible signs linked to the use of technology are that victims try to escape these technologies by sleeping somewhere else, which is also linked to homelessness, and I believe Jared Loughner exhibited these signs or pattern.

Last Note:

I have been watching the news for several years and it has become more obvious to me the attempts to suppress these events possible links to bullying and workplace psychological harassment.

The events linked to criminal harassment or mobbing networks are not as obvious but also becoming more visible.

Suicide Letter by Mark Lepine:

"Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons."

What I find strange about Mark Lepine's suicide letter is that he seems to believe that rage shootings or rampages and suicide are linked to having no more money or homelessness, which he wanted to make sure we did not believe was the cause.

And eliminating a person's money and pushing a person to homelessness is one of the main objectives by criminal harassment or mobbing networks, the mob.

Research note, was this a typed or hand written letter?

Article about psychiatrist Marie-France Hirigoyen:

Mobbing Research: Rage Shootings and Rampages
March 22, 2011
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-577689

The research aims to eliminate many issues linked to psychological harassment such as sexual harassment, discrimination, rage shootings and rampages, and follows the work or writings of Heinz Laymann PH.D, Margaret Thaler Singer PH.D, and Marie-France Hirigoyen.

According to Marie-France Hirigoyen the intent of many emotional abusers is to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity, and often emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger aka hitting back, only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves, which could be linked to or the cause of rage shooting and rampages.

- Often, emotional abuse builds over a long period of time until it becomes so unbearable that victims lash out in frustration and anger, only to appear unstable and aggressive themselves.

- This, according to Hirigoyen, is the intent of many abusers: to systematically "destabilize" and confuse their victims (with irrational, threatening behavior that preys on the victim's fears and self-doubts), to isolate and control them and ultimately to destroy their identity.

- psychiatrist Marie-France Hirigoyen, author of Le harcèlement moral

 

THE SEVENTH STRATEGY
INTERVENTION AND INCARCERATION

THE TWELFTH STRATEGY
POWERFUL RADAR ASSAULTS

Workplace Psychological Harassment And Mobbing Victims

In the work place it takes the form of knowing that they want to get rid of you and try to provoke or anger you to make you seem aggressive and unstable, deranged, etc, see Marie France Hirigoyens description for the intent of abusers.

Out of the workplace it is similar, you are dealing with neighboring participants or participants in public places that have the same intent or are simply participants. It is a bit different in some cases when crime is involved, police investigators will have a better understanding since in some cases they deal with suspects that they already know are guilty ,, hypocrisy,, you are faced with participants or neighbors who act as if nothing is wrong, the usual neighborly friendliness.

Example

Imagine knowing radiation technology, powerful radar, or ground penetrating radar is coming from a neighbor and when they see you it's the usual "hi, how are you doing" .. "ok, you?" ..

The game, "he's a nice guy, ground penetrating radar? he must be deranged and possibly dangerous"

Police game, since there already exists a conflict with the police, criminal allegations and proceedings that are false, the police is more than ready to agree with the participants, a mobbing strategy, which means that during criminal proceedings victims of false allegations become more vulnerable to organized crime for these reasons.

 

Run For The Cure, British Regimes Repressing Population and Human Rights Defenders Through Cancer? - (news flash)

SARCASM, Run For The Cure In London, British Regimes like Canada, Australia, and Britain may all be using radiation technology and powerful radar assaults linked to deadly cancers like lung cancer to repress the population, and human rights defenders. The strategy involves using criminal allegations to put the victims of these on the defensive through threats of intervention leading to incarceration during the criminal proceedings, using nearby homes and surveillance technology to assault the victims in the lung area, lung irritation, damage, and cancer, ridiculing victims, and claiming they are smokers. More ..

RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, POWERFUL RADAR, AND FOCUSED ULTRASOUND

The mob and organized crime are using technology to target citizens and this is only a short summery of some of their use.

DAMAGE:
TESTICLES; this organized crime network tries to damage the testicles, which are linked to a man's health, testosterone production, muscle loss, degrading themes, "turning men into women", "the police want your balls", "you have to turn over".
THROAT AND LYMPH-NODES; radiation technology is aimed at the throat and lymph-node area, which burns and inflames the throat linked to throat cancer, and burns the throat lymph-nodes, damaging them.
LUNGS; the radiation technology and powerful radar are aimed at the lungs area, which inflames and scares them, which are linked to deadly lung cancer.
SHINS; powerful radar is aimed at the shin area, the shin bone, which is linked to damaging the bone marrow and leukemia.
BLOOD; powerful radar is linked to shifting blood counts and leukemia.
SLEEP DEPRIVATION; sleep deprivation is linked to or used for premature aging, drastically increases the risk of cancer, over sixty percent increase, and stress is linked to most illnesses, over eighty percent.
GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; from neighboring homes.
HUMAN RIGHTS; we hear of different human rights violations and more visible violence by the "secret police" of other regimes like Egypt and Syria, this technology and type of violence linked to serious illness, leukemia and cancer, are linked to the British Regimes such as Canada, Great Britain, and Australia. They ridicule victims and deny their claims.

STRATEGY -- "RUN AWAY OR GET CANCER"

 

Stephan Hardy Strategy

When the criminal harassment network led me to conclude that I had caused the death of Stephan Hardy's twin sister, Celine Hardy, they also used the voice of Stephan Hardy or someone that sounds like him to "bring me down", depression, which was used in a form of assassination attempt through influence of the mind, suicide.

His voice, or someone that sounds like him, is still used to this day while I'm assaulted with radiation technology and powerful radar.